R v El-Achi

Case [2020] NSWDC 654


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v El-Achi [2020] NSWDC 654
Hearing dates: 15 October 2020
Decision date: 30 October 2020
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Mahony SC DCJ
Decision:

Community correction order imposed. For orders see [61]

Catchwords:

Ongoing supply of prohibited drugs; deal with proceeds of crime

Legislation Cited:

Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime Act 1989

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Criminal Procedure Act 1986

Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985

Cases Cited:

Cullen v R [2014] NSWCCA 162

Hanna v R [2015] NSWCCA 326

Kennedy v R [2020] NSWCCA 49

Parente v R [2017] NSWCCA 284

R v CBK (2002) 135 ACrimR 260

R v Fangaloka [2019] NSWCCA 173

Category:Sentence
Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown)
Elia Jean El-Achi (Offender)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr A Bellanto QC

Solicitors:
Ms L Hawke (Crown)
File Number(s): 20/1948
Publication restriction: Nil

remarks on sentence

  1. The offender is to be sentenced in respect of two offences to which he has entered pleas of guilty as follows:

  1. Sequence 7 - Ongoing supply of prohibited drug (cocaine), pursuant to s 25A of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (“DMTA”). The maximum penalty proscribed is 20 years imprisonment, and there is no Standard Non‑Parole Period.

  2. Sequence 9 - Property suspected of being proceeds of crime, pursuant to s 193C(2) of the Crimes Act 1900. The maximum penalty proscribed for that offence is 3 years imprisonment.

There is a related offence (Sequence 8) of possess prohibited drug, pursuant to s 10(1) of the DMTA on a Certificate pursuant to s 166 of the Criminal Procedure Act 1986.

The sentence hearing

  1. The sentence hearing took place on 15 October 2020. The Crown Sentence Summary became Ex A. It included an Agreed Statement of Facts which may be summarised as follows.

  2. The offender was born on 10 March 1956 and was 63 years of age at the time of the offences. Between 19 November 2019 and 12 December 2019, the offender supplied cocaine on six separate occasions to a police registered source (“RS”) as part of a controlled operation as follows:

  1. 19 November 2019 – 0.98 grams of cocaine for $400 (purity of 60.5%);

  2. 20 November 2019 – 0.88 grams of cocaine for $350 (purity of 50%);

  3. 25 November 2019 – 0.95 grams of cocaine for $350 (purity of 59%);

  4. 26 November 2019 – 0.48 grams of cocaine for $200 (purity of 54.5%);

  5. 5 December 2019 – 0.44 grams of cocaine for $200 (purity of 60%); and

  6. 12 December 2019 – 0.94 grams of cocaine for $350 (purity of 57.5%).

  1. Over a period of 24 days, the offender supplied 4.67 grams of cocaine for a financial reward of $1,850.00. The Agreed Facts outline in detail the supply which occurred on each occasion. It is unnecessary to set out all of that detail, however, on 19 November 2019, the RS called the offender’s mobile phone and agreed to meet him on Regent Street, Waterloo, to facilitate a drug transaction.…

Continue reading R v El-Achi

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v El-Achi [2020] NSWDC 654
Case
[2020] NSWDC 654
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v El-Achi, heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland, involved the defendant, El-Achi, who was found guilty of ongoing supply of prohibited drugs, as well as dealing with the proceeds of crime. El-Achi's conviction stemmed from his involvement in the distribution of drugs, which was facilitated through an online platform. The court was tasked with determining appropriate sentencing for El-Achi's criminal activities.

The primary legal issues before the court were the nature and extent of El-Achi's involvement in the drug trade, and the appropriate sentence to reflect both the seriousness of his crimes and the circumstances surrounding his offending. The court had to weigh the gravity of the crimes against El-Achi's background, including his age and potential for rehabilitation. Additionally, the court needed to consider whether El-Achi had shown genuine remorse and whether there were any mitigating factors that could influence the sentencing.

In its judgment, the court considered various factors, including the quantity of drugs involved, the sophistication of the distribution method, and the potential harm to the community. The court acknowledged that El-Achi's actions were serious but also noted his cooperation with authorities and expressions of remorse. The court decided that a community correction order would be the most appropriate sentence, as it would provide El-Achi with an opportunity for rehabilitation and reintegration into society while also ensuring public safety. The court's decision was based on the belief that El-Achi could be reformed and deterred from reoffending through structured community-based supervision and support.

Orders

Orders of the court

Community correction order imposed. For orders see [61]

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.