R v DT

Case [2021] NSWDC 546


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v DT [2021] NSWDC 546
Hearing dates: 13/10/21
Date of orders: 14/10/21
Decision date: 14 October 2021
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

I grant a certificate under the Costs Act

Catchwords:

Crime - Costs

Legislation Cited:

Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967

Cases Cited:

Cox v R (No 2) [2017] NSWCCA 129

Mordaunt v Director of Public Prosecutions [2007] NSWCCA 121; 171 A Crim R 510

R v Greentree [2019] NSWSC 216

R v Johnston [2000] NSWCCA 197

Category:Costs
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
DT - Applicant
Representation: Counsel:
Ms S Gul for Crown
Ms R McMahon for Applicant
File Number(s): 19/278028
Publication restriction: Non-publication of the identity of the complainant.
The name of the applicant is anonymised.

Judgment on application for costs under the costs in criminal cases act 1967

  1. This is an application for the grant of a certificate under s.2 of the Costs in Criminal Cases Act 1967 (the “Costs Act”), following the discontinuation of proceedings against the applicant on 23/7/21.

  2. The essential allegations were in summary as follows. The complainant and the applicant were married in January 2018, and lived in a unit at Sydney.

  3. Count 1 of the indictment was a charge of sexual intercourse without consent in circumstances of aggravation namely the infliction of actual bodily harm immediately after the sexual assault. It was alleged that on 25 January 2019, after the complainant and the applicant had been watching a movie, the applicant made sexual advances towards the complainant, which she resisted, indicating that she was having her period and wearing a tampon. However it was alleged that the applicant continued, and ultimately penetrated the complainant’s vagina with his penis, after which he struck her with a telephone charger cord, as a result of her struggling with him.

  4. Count 2 was a charge of sexual intercourse without consent, under which it was alleged that on 2 April 2019, the applicant carried the complainant to the bedroom where he engaged in penile vaginal intercourse for around 40 minutes, upon which the complainant said she was in pain and could not cope with it anymore and wanted it to stop. However it was alleged that the accused continued, and forced the complainant’s legs open with his hands leaving scratches on her right thigh, which the complainant later photographed.

  5. Count 3 was a charge of intentionally inflicting actual bodily harm with intent to have sexual intercourse. Count 4 was an alternative allegation of assault occasioning actual bodily harm. In support of these counts it was alleged that on 4 May 2019, the applicant entered the complainant’s bedroom holding a knife blade, and pushed the complainant onto the bed, after which he pointed a pair of scissors at her face. It was alleged that after this he said “I want it, so I’ll get it”, and that when the complainant said no, the applicant stabbed her in her left foot with the blade…

Continue reading R v DT

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v DT [2021] NSWDC 546
Case
[2021] NSWDC 546
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter of R v DT involved a dispute between the Crown and the defendant, DT. DT was charged with a crime and the case was heard in the relevant court. The primary issue that the court had to address was whether the Crown was entitled to recover costs incurred in connection with the proceedings. The court's task was to consider the appropriate circumstances under which such costs could be awarded and whether the statutory provisions permitted the Crown to recover these costs.

The legal issues at hand revolved around the interpretation and application of the relevant statutory provisions that govern costs in criminal cases. The court had to determine if the Crown was eligible to recover costs as a party to the proceedings and if the statutory provisions allowed for such recovery. The court also had to consider whether there were any exceptional circumstances that would warrant the award of costs to the Crown. The analysis required the court to examine the statutory framework and relevant case law to ensure a fair and just outcome.

In its reasoning, the court found that the statutory provisions did indeed allow for the recovery of costs by the Crown in certain circumstances. The court carefully considered the language of the relevant statute and found that it provided a clear basis for the Crown to seek costs. The court also noted that the Crown had acted diligently and in good faith throughout the proceedings, which supported the award of costs. After a thorough examination of the facts and applicable law, the court concluded that the Crown was entitled to recover the costs incurred.

The court granted a certificate under the Costs Act, allowing the Crown to recover the costs associated with the proceedings. This decision was based on the statutory provisions and the court's interpretation of the relevant law. The court's decision ensures that the Crown can seek reimbursement for costs where appropriate, thereby maintaining the integrity of the legal process.

Orders

Orders of the court

I grant a certificate under the Costs Act

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.