R v Donaldson

Case [2023] NSWDC 337


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Donaldson [2023] NSWDC 337
Hearing dates: 10/3/23
Date of orders: 10/3/23
Decision date: 10 March 2023
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

I allow a 25 percent discount for the plea of guilty.

Convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a period of 12 months. I order, however, that he be released forthwith, upon a Recognisance Release Order, after entering a self-recognisance in the amount of $500, subject to the following conditions:

1. Be of good behaviour for 3 years.

2. Be subject to the supervision of Community Corrections.

3. Obey the reasonable directions of Community Corrections.

4. Not travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of Community Corrections.

5. Undertake such treatment or other rehabilitation or counselling as is reasonably directed by Community Corrections.

I direct that offender report to the Penrith office of Community Corrections within 7 days.

I direct that a copy of the report of Istvan Schreiner dated 30/10/22 be sent to Community Corrections.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence – Commonwealth offences – Transmit child abuse material using a carriage service

Legislation Cited:

Commonwealth Criminal Code

Crimes Act 1914

Cases Cited:

R v Porte (2015) NSWCCA 174

Minehan v R (2010) NSWCCA 140

R v Hutchinson (2019) NSWCCA 152

R (Commonwealth) v Nafarette (2022) NSWDC 225

Category:Sentence
Parties: Commonwealth DPP – Crown
Bruce Ian Donaldson - Offender
Representation: Ms M Grawich for Crown
Mr B Walker for Offender
File Number(s): 22/77285

sentence

  1. The offender, Mr Bruce Donaldson, has pleaded guilty to an offence under s 474.22(1) of the Commonwealth Criminal Code, being an offence that on 24 February 2022, he transmitted material using a carriage service, the material being child abuse material. The maximum penalty for that offence is 15 years' imprisonment, which is of course a guideline or yardstick to which I have had regard in the sentencing exercise.

  2. He pleaded guilty at the earliest opportunity, and while there is no statutory defined discount for the value of a plea of a guilty in a Commonwealth matter, I intend to allow a discount of 25% by reason of the utilitarian value of that plea.

FACTS

  1. The facts of the offence are agreed and in essence are as follows.

  2. On 24 February 2022, investigators within the Child Abuse and Sex Crimes Squad of NSW Police commenced a covert online investigation using an assumed online identity of a 14-year-old female child. I will refer to the assumed online identity hereafter as the AOI.

  3. About 6.30pm on that night the AOI logged into a chat room on a platform called ChatIW and was contacted by the offender who was using an account with the username DA, and which included the details, “53 years, Australia, New South Wales.” A conversation then occurred on that platform. Some of the conversation included abbreviations. However, to make more sense of the conversation I will ignore the abbreviations and refer to what appear to be the actual words…

Continue reading R v Donaldson

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Donaldson [2023] NSWDC 337
Case
[2023] NSWDC 337
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The defendant, Donaldson, faced a charge of transmitting child abuse material using a carriage service, a Commonwealth offence. The case was heard in the District Court of New South Wales. The dispute centred on the severity and appropriateness of the sentence to be imposed on the defendant, who had pleaded guilty to the charge.

The court was tasked with determining an appropriate sentence for the offence, taking into account the plea of guilty and any other relevant factors. The legal issues included the appropriate discount for the plea of guilty, the length of the custodial sentence, and the conditions to be attached to any non-custodial sentence.

The court considered the defendant's guilty plea and accepted that it warranted a 25 percent discount on the sentence. It was noted that the offence involved the transmission of child abuse material, which was a serious matter. The court took into account the defendant's previous criminal history, his remorse, and the need for deterrence and rehabilitation. After weighing these factors, the court decided on a sentence of imprisonment for 12 months but ordered the defendant to be released forthwith under a Recognisance Release Order, subject to conditions including good behaviour for three years, supervision by Community Corrections, and compliance with reasonable directions.

Orders

Orders of the court

I allow a 25 percent discount for the plea of guilty.

Convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment for a period of 12 months. I order, however, that he be released forthwith, upon a Recognisance Release Order, after entering a self-recognisance in the amount of $500, subject to the following conditions:

1. Be of good behaviour for 3 years.

2. Be subject to the supervision of Community Corrections.

3. Obey the reasonable directions of Community Corrections.

4. Not travel interstate or overseas without the written permission of Community Corrections.

5. Undertake such treatment or other rehabilitation or counselling as is reasonably directed by Community Corrections.

I direct that offender report to the Penrith office of Community Corrections within 7 days.

I direct that a copy of the report of Istvan Schreiner dated 30/10/22 be sent to Community Corrections.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.