R v DeSalvo

Case [2002] QCA 63


[2002] QCA 63

COURT OF APPEAL

McPHERSON JA
WILLIAMS JA
BYRNE J

CA No 284 of 2001

THE QUEEN

v.

DEREK ALBERT DESALVO                (Applicant/Appellant)

BRISBANE

..DATE 15/03/2002

JUDGMENT

THE PRESIDENT:  This appeal was heard by Judges of Appeal McPherson and Williams and Justice Byrne.  The order is the application for leave to appeal is granted, the appeal is allowed and the sentence set aside.

The applicant is sentenced to imprisonment for nine years with a declaration that the presentence custody period of 430 days be regarded as time served under that sentence.  I publish the separate reasons for Judgment of each member of the Court, Judges of Appeal McPherson and Williams concurring as to the orders made, Justice Byrne dissenting.

-----

Details
AGLC
R v DeSalvo [2002] QCA 63
Case
[2002] QCA 63
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of R v DeSalvo, the applicant, Derek Albert DeSalvo, was appealing against a sentence imposed by the Supreme Court of Queensland. The appeal was heard by McPherson JA, Williams JA and Byrne JCA. DeSalvo was convicted of serious criminal offences and the issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive.

The legal issues for the Court of Appeal to determine were whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive and whether it was appropriate to allow the appeal. The Court of Appeal had to consider whether the sentence imposed by the trial judge was within the range of appropriate sentences for the crimes committed. The Court also had to consider whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive and disproportionate to the gravity of the offences committed.

The Court of Appeal found that the sentence imposed by the trial judge was manifestly excessive and disproportionate to the gravity of the offences committed. The Court of Appeal held that the sentence was not within the range of appropriate sentences for the crimes committed. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the sentence imposed by the trial judge. The Court of Appeal sentenced DeSalvo to imprisonment for nine years with a declaration that the presentence custody period of 430 days be regarded as time served under that sentence.

In conclusion, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal and set aside the sentence imposed by the trial judge. The Court of Appeal found that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive and disproportionate to the gravity of the offences committed. The Court of Appeal sentenced DeSalvo to imprisonment for nine years with a declaration that the presentence custody period of 430 days be regarded as time served under that sentence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.