SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
R v Dean [2006] QCA 256
PARTIES:
R
v
DEAN, Robert Kevin
(applicant/appellant)FILE NO/S:
CA No 88 of 2006
DC No 1802 of 2005DIVISION:
Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:
Sentence Application
ORIGINATING COURT:
District Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED EX TEMPORE ON:
14 July 2006
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
14 July 2006
JUDGES:
Williams JA, Jerrard JA and Holmes JA
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the orders madeORDER:
1. Leave to appeal granted
2. Allow the appeal to the extent of reducing the period of disqualification from four years to three yearsCATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL - APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE - APPEAL BY CONVICTED PERSONS - APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE - where the appellant was found guilty of dangerous operation of a motor vehicle and sentenced to nine months imprisonment, suspended after one month, for an operational period of 12 months – the appellant was also disqualified from holding a driver’s licence for a period of four years – the offence involved the appellant driving an unregistered vehicle dangerously whilst trying to avoid police – whether the disqualification for four years was excessive considering the offence in question, the applicant’s traffic history and his family circumstances
Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), s 187, s 187(1)(b)
Transport Operations Road Use Management Act 1995 (Qld),
s 86(3), s 131(2)R v Bagust [2003] QCA 385; CA No 182 of 2003, 3 September 2003, considered
R v Bawden [2004] QCA 285; CA No 59 of 2004, 6 August 2004, considered
R v Bolton [2000] QCA 175; CA No 40 of 2000, 11 May 2000, considered
R v Cunningham [2005] QCA 321; CA No 145 of 2005, 29 August 2005, distinguished
R v Fanning [2005] QCA 267; CA No 132 of 2005, 1 August 2005, consideredCOUNSEL:
R A East for the applicant/appellant
M J Copley for the respondentSOLICITORS:
Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant/appellant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent
WILLIAMS JA: The applicant was convicted on 23 March 2006 after a trial of the offence, that on 25 June 2004 he operated a motor vehicle dangerously. He was sentenced to nine months imprisonment, suspended after one month, for an operational period of 12 months and disqualified from holding or obtaining a driver's licence for a period of four years. He seeks leave to appeal only against that part of the sentence relating to the disqualification.
The circumstances of the offence were particularly serious. The applicant was driving an unregistered vehicle which he had fitted with registration plates from another vehicle. At about 10 am on the day in question, he drove dangerously in an effort to avoid police interest in his vehicle.
After the lights and siren of the police vehicle were put on, the applicant accelerated, travelled at about 10 kilometres per hour…
Continue reading R v Dean
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Dean [2006] QCA 256
- Case
- [2006] QCA 256
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the principles of sentencing and the appropriate balance between deterrence and rehabilitation. It was acknowledged that the offence involved significant risk to public safety, but the court also recognised the appellant's limited prior convictions and his role as a sole carer for his young children. The court examined similar cases and the impact of lengthy disqualification periods on the appellant's ability to support his family. After weighing these factors, the court determined that the original sentence was unduly harsh.
Consequently, the appeal was allowed in part. The court reduced the period of disqualification from four years to three years, taking into account the mitigating factors presented. The decision reflects a nuanced approach to sentencing, balancing the need for public safety with the personal circumstances of the offender. The court's ruling ensures that the sentence remains punitive while also considering the practical implications for the appellant's family.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Leave to appeal granted
2. Allow the appeal to the extent of reducing the period of disqualification from four years to three years
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.