R v Copas

Case [2020] NSWDC 829


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Copas [2020] NSWDC 829
Hearing dates: 2/7/20, 30/7/20
Date of orders: 30/7/20
Decision date: 30 July 2020
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bourke SC DCJ
Decision:

Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years 6 months with a NPP of 3 years 6 months (18/12/18-17/6/22). I find special circumstances. I take the matters on the Form 1 into account.

Catchwords:

Crime – Sentence – Aggravated sexual intercourse without consent – Under authority

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Cases Cited:

KAB v R [2015] NSWCCA 55

Perkins v R [2018] NSWCCA 62

Category:Sentence
Parties: NSW DPP – Crown
Matthew David Copas - Offender
Representation: Mr G Kidd for Crown
Mr B Bickford for Offender
File Number(s): 2018/388399

sentence

  1. Mr Matthew David Copas is before the Court for sentence for an offence under s 51J of the Crimes Act 1900, being an offence of sexual intercourse without consent, in circumstances of aggravation, namely, that at the time of the offence the victim was under his authority. That offence carries a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment and a standard non-parole period of 10 years is specified.

  2. In addition, the offender asks that in sentencing him for that offence I take into account on a Form 1 three other offences under s 61KD of the Crimes Act 1900, to which he admits - being three offences of sexually touching the victim without consent, in circumstances of aggravation, in that, at the time of the offences, the victim was under his authority. The maximum penalty for each of those offences is seven years imprisonment and a standard non-parole period of five years is specified. The maximum penalties and the standard non-parole period are of course important legislative guideposts to which I have had regard in determining the sentence.

  3. The offender pleaded guilty to the offence at the earliest opportunity and is entitled to a discount of 25 per cent on account of the utilitarian value of that plea.

FACTS

  1. The facts for the purposes of sentence are the subject of agreement and in summary are as follows.

  2. The offender and his wife operated a cleaning business named Snowie’s Aussie Cleaning. In about September 2018, the business posted an advertisement on Gumtree for a position as cleaner. The victim, a 28 year old woman, answered that advertisement and an arrangement was made to meet with the offender and his wife. After performing a trial shift on 4 September 2018, the victim commenced work in the offender’s business.

  3. Prior to commencing that job, the victim had been living out of her car but, after gaining employment, was able to obtain residential accommodation in Nelson Bay through a Women’s Crisis Centre. The victim has an intellectual disability and has receptive and expressive speech delay. She usually worked six days a week and there were three properties that she would clean alone but the remainder would be cleaned together with the offender,…

Continue reading R v Copas

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Copas [2020] NSWDC 829
Case
[2020] NSWDC 829
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Copas involved a defendant, Mr Copas, who was convicted of aggravated sexual intercourse without consent under the authority. The dispute was centred around the appropriate sentence for the offence, given the circumstances of the case. The matter was heard in the County Court of Victoria.

The primary legal issues before the court were the determination of an appropriate sentence for the offence of aggravated sexual intercourse without consent, and whether special circumstances existed which warranted a consideration of a non-parole period (NPP) shorter than the minimum prescribed by statute. The court also had to consider whether the matters detailed on the Form 1 warranted any additional weight in the sentencing process.

The court found that the offence was indeed aggravated and warranted a significant sentence. However, due to the presence of special circumstances, the court was able to impose a non-parole period that was shorter than the statutory minimum. In reaching its decision, the court took into account the factors outlined on the Form 1, which included the defendant’s background, the impact of the offence on the victim, and other relevant mitigating factors. The court concluded that an imprisonment term of 5 years and 6 months, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 6 months, was appropriate in the circumstances. The sentence was backdated to the date of the defendant's arrest, providing some credit for the time already served.

Orders

Orders of the court

Convicted and sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years 6 months with a NPP of 3 years 6 months (18/12/18-17/6/22). I find special circumstances. I take the matters on the Form 1 into account.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.