R v Conway

Case [2019] NSWDC 891


District Court


New South Wales

  • Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Conway [2019] NSWDC 891
Hearing dates: 16 December 2019
Date of orders: 17 December 2019
Decision date: 17 December 2019
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Bright DCJ
Decision:

Aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years 4 months.

Catchwords:

CRIME — Violent offences — Reckless wounding

CRIME — Violent offences — Assault occasioning actual bodily harm

SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Co-offenders — Parity

SENTENCING — Relevant factors on sentence — Multiple offences — Accumulation, concurrency and totality

Legislation Cited:

Crimes Act 1900

Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999

Summary Offences Act 1988
Weapons Prohibition Act 1998
 

Cases Cited:

Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1

Majzoub v R [2019] NSWCCA 94

Moore v R [2019] NSWCCA 264

Patsan v R [2018] NSWCCA 129
R v Kilic (2016) 259 CLR 256; HCA 48

 
Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina
Sam Conway
Representation:

Counsel: Mr M Smith for Defence

  Solicitors: Ms H Cantor for DPP
File Number(s): 2019/1488

Judgment

  1. Sam Conway, 27 years of age, appears for sentence in relation to the following offences:

  1. Assault occasioning actual bodily harm, (victim April Huisman) an offence pursuant to s 59 (1), Crimes Act 1900 (NSW). The maximum prescribed penalty for that offence is five years imprisonment. There is no prescribed standard non parole period.

  2. Reckless wounding in company (victim Jamie Bridge), an offence pursuant to s 35 (3), Crimes Act. The maximum prescribed penalty for that offence is ten years imprisonment. There is a prescribed standard non parole period of four years.

  1. The offender is also being sentenced for two further offences on a s 166 Certificate as follows:

  1. Custody of a knife in a public place, an offence pursuant to s 11C(1), Summary Offences Act 1988 (NSW). The maximum prescribed penalty for that offence is two years imprisonment and/or a fine of 20 penalty units.

  2. Possess or use a prohibited weapon without permit (Taser), an offence to pursuant to s 7 (1), Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW). The maximum prescribed penalty for that offence when dealt with on indictment is 14 years imprisonment when dealt with in the Local Court the maximum available penalty is two years imprisonment.

  1. The offender pleaded guilty on 8 October 2019 at the Wyong Local Court. Having regard to the timing of the plea, I propose to allow a discount on sentence in respect of each offence of 25%.

  2. It is agreed between the parties that the offender has spent nine months and 20 days in custody in relation to these offences (and other unrelated matters).

  3. It is agreed that the sentence imposed today should be backdated to 24 February 2019.

Agreed facts

  1. The offender and April Huisman had been in a relationship. They share a son born during the relationship. The relationship ended in about September 2018.

  2. Since the breakup April Huisman had begun spending time with Jamie Bridge. They were friends. In early…

Continue reading R v Conway

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Conway [2019] NSWDC 891
Case
[2019] NSWDC 891
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of R v Conway involved the respondent, Conway, who was charged with violent offences including reckless wounding and assault occasioning actual bodily harm. The case was heard in a court of criminal jurisdiction. The primary dispute was the appropriate sentence for Conway, considering the nature of the offences and the circumstances surrounding them.

The legal issues the court needed to address included determining the relevance of the co-offenders' conduct in sentencing, the appropriate treatment of multiple offences in terms of accumulation, concurrency, and totality, and the factors that should be considered in arriving at a just sentence. The court needed to balance the severity and nature of the offences with mitigating factors, such as Conway's cooperation with authorities and his remorse.

The court carefully considered the aggravating and mitigating factors in the case. It noted the seriousness of the offences, but also recognised Conway's cooperation with law enforcement and his expression of remorse. The court determined that an aggregate term of imprisonment of four years, with a non-parole period of two years and four months, was appropriate. This sentence took into account the need for deterrence, denunciation, and the rehabilitation of Conway, while also ensuring parity with co-offenders and considering the totality of the offences.

The court's decision reflects a balanced approach to sentencing, recognising the gravity of the offences while also considering the broader circumstances of the case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Aggregate term of imprisonment of 4 years with a non-parole period of 2 years 4 months.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.