District Court
New South Wales
- Amendment notes
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Chris Lentini [2020] NSWDC 132 Hearing dates: 12 March 2020; 1 April 2020; 22 April 2020 Date of orders: 22 April 2020 Decision date: 22 April 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Wilson SC DCJ Decision: Full time custodial sentence; compensatory orders. At [70] – [80]
Catchwords: CRIME – sentence – vehicle collision – grievous bodily harm – failing to stop to give assistance – negligent driving and other offences – no remorse – no special circumstances Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 NSW s52AB
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 NSW s3A
Road Rules 2014 NSW s287
Road Transport Act 2013 NSW ss54, 146 & 117
Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 NSW s97Cases Cited: R v Pullen [2018] NSWCCA 264
Hoskins v R [2020] NSWCCA 18Texts Cited: None Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown)
Christopher Lentini (Offender)Representation: Solicitors:
Ms H NG (ODPP)
Ms V Barnsley (GTC Lawyers)
File Number(s): 2019/00033832 Publication restriction: None
Judgment
-
Chris Lentini was born on 28 May 1987 and will soon be 33 years of age.
-
He appears before the Court today in relation to a primary offence, together with 2 related offences and 2 back-up offences, the latter to be withdrawn upon conviction.
-
All offences arise out of the same charge number (870882341) and relate to a specific event which occurred on 29 January 2019. By reference to the charge certificate (Exhibit A, Tab C), the following are the charges:
Count 1 – contravention of s52AB of the Crimes Act 1900 NSW, arising from the fact that on 29 January 2019 the Offender was involved in a motor vehicle accident, causing grievous bodily harm to Calvin Pullen (Mr Pullen), and at the time the Offender ought to have reasonably known that the impact had occasioned grievous bodily harm or death, and subsequently did fail to stop and give necessary assistance. This charge carries a maximum period of imprisonment of 7 years, together with an automatic disqualification of 3 years;
Count 2 – this was a contravention of s146(1) of the Road Transport Act 2013 NSW, which is a backup charge to the same effect as Count 1, namely failing to stop and assist after impact causing injury. This charge will be dismissed upon conviction;
Count 3 – this relates to contravention of s54(1)(a) of the Road Transport Act, in that on the date specified, the Offender drove a motor vehicle on a road during a period of disqualification. This is a related offence for which the Offender is to be convicted and sentenced;
Count 4 – this is a contravention of s117(1)(b) of the Road Transport Act in that the Offender did negligently drive a motor vehicle upon a road occasioning grievous bodily harm. This offence carries a maximum penalty of 9 months imprisonment or 20 penalty units ($2,200) together with an automatic license disqualification of 3 years. This is a related charge for which the Offender will be convicted…
Continue reading R v Chris Lentini
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Chris Lentini [2020] NSWDC 132
- Case
- [2020] NSWDC 132
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court involved assessing the culpability of Lentini's actions, the degree of negligence, and the appropriate penalty for his offences. The court considered the absence of remorse as a significant aggravating factor and weighed it against any mitigating circumstances that might have been presented. Additionally, the court needed to decide on the necessity for compensatory orders to address the harm caused to the victim.
The court found that the offences committed by Lentini warranted a full-time custodial sentence due to the severity of the harm caused and his failure to stop and provide assistance. The absence of remorse and the lack of any special circumstances that could have potentially mitigated the sentence were also critical considerations. The court emphasised the importance of holding individuals accountable for such negligent actions, particularly when they involve a failure to assist others in distress. The final orders included a custodial sentence and compensatory orders to address the harm suffered by the victim.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full time custodial sentence; compensatory orders. At [70] – [80]
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.