District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Chick [2020] NSWDC 650 Hearing dates: 4 June 2020 Decision date: 04 June 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Haesler SC DCJ Decision: Use carriage service to send indecent material to person under 16 years: a term of imprisonment of 1 year 6 months; Suspended upon entering a recognizance to be of good behaviour for 2 years pursuant to s 20(1)(b) Crimes Act 1914(Cth)
Use carriage service to solicit child pornography: Suspended upon entering a recognizance to be of good behaviour for 2 years pursuant to s 20(1)(A) Crimes Act 1914(Cth)
Catchwords: CRIME – use a carriage service to send indecent material to a person less than 16 years old - use a carriage service to solicit child pornography material
SENTENCING - Relevant factors on sentence - early guilty plea -
Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offender’s Registration) Act 2000 (NSW)
Crimes Act 1914(Cth)
Criminal Code1995 (Cth)
Cases Cited: Gajjar v R [2008) VSCA 268
Kristensen v R [2018] NSWCCA 189
R v Asplund; Asplund v R [2010] NSWCCA 316
Category: Sentence Parties: Daniel Edward Chick (the offender)
Director of Public Prosecutions (Commonwealth)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
Ms M Humpreys (for the offender)
Mr K Kanagasabapathy (for Director of Public Prosecutions, Commonwealth)
Kells (for the offender)
Director of Public Prosecutions, Commonwealth
File Number(s): 2019/00326566
SENTENCE – EX TEMPORE REVISED
Introduction
-
Mr Chick, in relation to the two matters before the Court you are convicted. I will not be sending you to gaol today instead you will be subject to very strict orders. I can assure you that should you breach any of those orders, there will not be any compunction about gaoling you. You will get a second chance today. Do you understand? Take a seat. I have to give my reasons for my decision.
-
Daniel Chick was born in 1975. He has never been accused of a criminal offence until he was arrested for the current matters.
-
In August and September of 2019 he engaged in internet “carriage services” communications with a person he assumed was a 14-year-old girl. On six days over about a month he sent highly sexualised messages and images to that ‘girl’ including images of his penis and a video of him masturbating. He repeatedly asked her for pictures of herself, pictures that had they been sent as requested would have been child pornography.
-
Full and explicit details are set out in the statement of facts tendered. It is not necessary for the purposes of sentencing to set out the content of the communications, other than to record that his words and actions were, highly sexualised and directed to his own sexual gratification and to the inducing, that is soliciting, the ‘girl’ to join with him in similar actions and send the requested images.
-
His…
Continue reading R v Chick
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Chick [2020] NSWDC 650
- Case
- [2020] NSWDC 650
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the seriousness of Chick’s actions, weighing the need for deterrence and the potential for rehabilitation. Given the sensitive nature of the crimes, the court acknowledged the significant harm caused by the defendant’s actions, particularly to the young victim. However, it also took into account the defendant’s early guilty plea, which was seen as an indicator of remorse and a willingness to accept responsibility. The court determined that while imprisonment was necessary, the specific circumstances warranted a suspended sentence to allow for the defendant’s rehabilitation under supervision.
For the offence of using a carriage service to send indecent material to a person under 16, the court sentenced Chick to a term of imprisonment of 1 year and 6 months, to be suspended upon the defendant entering a recognizance to be of good behaviour for 2 years, pursuant to section 20(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth). For the offence of soliciting child pornography, the court imposed a suspended sentence upon the defendant entering a recognizance to be of good behaviour for 2 years, pursuant to section 20(1)(A) of the same Act. These orders reflect a balance between the need for punishment and the opportunity for rehabilitation, considering the mitigating factors present in the case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Use carriage service to send indecent material to person under 16 years: a term of imprisonment of 1 year 6 months; Suspended upon entering a recognizance to be of good behaviour for 2 years pursuant to s 20(1)(b) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
Use carriage service to solicit child pornography: Suspended upon entering a recognizance to be of good behaviour for 2 years pursuant to s 20(1)(A) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth)
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.