Legal Research
Cases
R v Ceylan

R v Ceylan

Case [2020] VCC 1644

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: R v Ceylan [2020] VCC 1644
Case: [2020] VCC 1644
Decision Date: 9 October 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

R v Ceylan [2020] VCC 1644

Most Recent Citation

R v Ozkocak [[2020]] VCC 1961

Cases Citing This Decision

Gazzard v Metro Finance Pty Ltd [2025] VCC 592
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…erest in the vehicle. [17] Sentencing remarks in a case involving Mr Ceylan described Ms Gazzard as Mr Ceylan’s girlfriend or partner: R v Ceylan [2020] VCC 1644, Exhibit D3 at [24] and [55]. These descriptions were presumably derived from submissions made on Mr Ceylan’s behalf. Mr Ceylan testified that the submis…
Director of Public Prosecutions v Ceylan [2021] VCC 788
Citation 2

…or the three of them by reference in relation to the charge of attempting to pervert the course of justice. [1] Exhibit A on the Plea. [2] R v Ceylan [2020] VCC 1644. [3] R v Ozkocak [2020] VCC 1961. [4] DPP v Ceylan 31 March 2021. 4In essence, Sedat was in prison, he had had his bail refused for serious fraud cha…
R v Ozkocak [2020] VCC 1961
Citation 3

…th, was back in 2015. So it was stale by the time he was arrested and you and he were charged as well as other members of your family. [5] R v Ceylan [2020] VCC 1644 9So he was sitting in prison after he was refused bail by Beach JA.[6] He then instigated the phone calls using another inmate's number, to his forme…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Middleton v The Queen [2018] VSCA 23
Citation 1

…981 s. 73 – R v Buscema [2011] VSC 206 – Beljulji v The Queen; Semaan v The Queen [2017] VSCA 279 – Middleton v The Queen [2018] VSCA 23, referred to. SENTENCE – Serious offending – Recidivist offended – Substantial record of prior dishonesty – Poor prospects of rehabilitation – High level of moral culpability –…
Semaan v The Queen [2017] VSCA 279
Citation 2

…s, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 s. 73 – R v Buscema [2011] VSC 206 – Beljulji v The Queen; Semaan v The Queen [2017] VSCA 279 – Middleton v The Queen [2018] VSCA 23, referred to. SENTENCE – Serious offending – Recidivist offended – Substantial record of prior dishonesty – Poor prospects of rehabilita…
Pun v The Queen [2017] VSCA 219
Citation 3

…unciation paramount – Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic – Sentencing Act 1991 – Pun v The Queen [2017] VSCA 219 – Maddocks v The Queen [2011] VSCA 20 – R v Zotos [2008] VSCA 82 – Camara v The Queen [2015] VSCA 20 – DPP v Oksuz (2015) 47 VR 731, considered – Total Effective Sentence – 5 years and 3 months imprisonmen…
DPP v Oksuz [2015] VSCA 316
Citation 4

…VSCA 20 – R v Zotos [2008] VSCA 82 – Camara v The Queen [2015] VSCA 20 – DPP v Oksuz (2015) 47 VR 731, considered – Total Effective Sentence – 5 years and 3 months imprisonment – Non-Parole Period 3 years and 4 months. ---…
Camara v The Queen [2015] VSCA 20
Citation 5

…9 – Maddocks v The Queen [2011] VSCA 20 – R v Zotos [2008] VSCA 82 – Camara v The Queen [2015] VSCA 20 – DPP v Oksuz (2015) 47 VR 731, considered – Total Effective Sentence – 5 years and 3 months imprisonment – Non-Parole Period 3 years and 4 months. ---…
Maddocks v The Queen [2011] VSCA 20
Citation 6

…-19 pandemic – Sentencing Act 1991 – Pun v The Queen [2017] VSCA 219 – Maddocks v The Queen [2011] VSCA 20 – R v Zotos [2008] VSCA 82 – Camara v The Queen [2015] VSCA 20 – DPP v Oksuz (2015) 47 VR 731, considered – Total Effective Sentence – 5 years and 3 months imprisonment – Non-Parole Period 3 years and 4 mont…
R v Zotos [2008] VSCA 82
Citation 7

…1991 – Pun v The Queen [2017] VSCA 219 – Maddocks v The Queen [2011] VSCA 20 – R v Zotos [2008] VSCA 82 – Camara v The Queen [2015] VSCA 20 – DPP v Oksuz (2015) 47 VR 731, considered – Total Effective Sentence – 5 years and 3 months imprisonment – Non-Parole Period 3 years and 4 months. ---…
Re Ceylan [2018] VSC 361
Citation 8

…500,000. You were also charged with the drug possession charges and the uplifted summary charge on the current indictment. [15] Re Ceylan [2018] VSC 361 20You were required to show a compelling reason to obtain bail and you failed to do so. The committal proceeding in relation to the matter was due to occur in th…
R v Buscema [2011] VSC 206
Citation 9

…ainst the justice system – Crimes Act 1958 ss. 81 &82 – Drugs, Poisons and Controlled Substances Act 1981 s. 73 – R v Buscema [2011] VSC 206 – Beljulji v The Queen; Semaan v The Queen [2017] VSCA 279 – Middleton v The Queen [2018] VSCA 23, referred to. SENTENCE – Serious offending – Recidivist offended – Substant…

AI Chat coming soon