Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
ACN 116 746 859 (formerly known as Palermo Seafoods Pty Ltd) v Lunapas Pty Ltd
[2017] NSWSC 1583
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…ts seizure is a matter of dispute.[105] [104] Furness v Adrium Industries Pty Ltd [1996] 1 VR 668 at 675 (Marks J); ACN 116 746 859 v Lunapas Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1583 at [162]. [105] Ms Gazzard did not seek to prove any consequential loss.…
-
Bunnings Group Ltd v CHEP Australia Ltd
[2011] NSWCA 342
Citation 2
…Adrium Industries Pty Ltd [1996] 1 VR 668; ACN 116 746 859 v Lunapas Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1583; Bunnings Group Ply Ltd v Chep Australian Ltd (2011) 82 NSWLR 420; Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298…
-
Gollan v Nugent
[1988] HCA 59
Citation 3
(Para 14)
…thority that it is no bar to a conversion action that the plaintiff intends to use the returned chattel in the commission of a crime: Gollan v Nugent (1988) 166 CLR 18.…
-
Jones v Dunkel
[1959] HCA 9
Citation 4
…y Ltd [1996] 1 VR 668; ACN 116 746 859 v Lunapas Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1583; Bunnings Group Ply Ltd v Chep Australian Ltd (2011) 82 NSWLR 420; Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298…
-
Jones v Dunkel
[1959] HCA 8
Citation 5
…VR 668; ACN 116 746 859 v Lunapas Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 1583; Bunnings Group Ply Ltd v Chep Australian Ltd (2011) 82 NSWLR 420; Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298…
-
R v Ceylan
[2020] VCC 1644
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…erest in the vehicle. [17] Sentencing remarks in a case involving Mr Ceylan described Ms Gazzard as Mr Ceylan’s girlfriend or partner: R v Ceylan [2020] VCC 1644, Exhibit D3 at [24] and [55]. These descriptions were presumably derived from submissions made on Mr Ceylan’s behalf. Mr Ceylan testified that the submis…