Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
1
-
R v Wong
[2015] NSWSC 1612
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…enders about actual sentencing practice. Guideline judgments are a mechanism for increasing the efficiency of the transmission of such knowledge. [2] (1999) 48 NSWLR 340 at [128].…
-
R v Lombardi
[2013] SASC 61
Citation 2
(Para 12)
…62 at [25], Sulan J referred to the comments that he made in Buhlmann and at [26], Sulan J also referred the decision of Kourakis CJ in R v Lombardi (2013) 115 SASR 577 at [22]-[24] where the Chief Justice said as follows: [22] It can be accepted that the term “special circumstances” cannot be comprehensively or exha…
-
R v Buhlmann
[2010] SASC 123
Citation 3
(Para 11)
…t of South Australia have considered the expression “special circumstances” where the phrase arises in s 10A(1) of the Bail Act . In R v Buhlmann [2010] SASC 123, Sulan J held as follows: The meaning of “special circumstances” was discussed by Mitchell J in Saywell v Yiu . In that case, the Local and District Crim…
-
R v Fowler
[2006] SASC 18
Citation 4
(Para 19)
…en whether to suspend. Such an approach would require the fulfillment of conditions which contradict the statutory requirement. [6] [2006] SASC 18…
-
R v Mangelsdorf
[1995] SASC 5328
Citation 5
(Para 20)
…deciding whether good reason exists to suspend. In Gjoka Doyle CJ reaffirmed that the test was whether good reason exists. [7] R v Mangelsdorf (1995) 66 SASR 60. [8] At [51] Fowler . [9] R v Gjoka (Unreported) Court of Criminal Appeal, 1 July 1997, Judgment No S 6211.…
-
Griffiths v The Queen
[1994] HCA 55
Citation 6
(Para 2)
…ertain. The first of these factors is not within the control of the courts; the second is. Consistency and certainty of sentence must be the aim. [3] (1977) 137 CLR 293 at 327.…
-
R v Briggs
[2014] SASC 62
Citation 7
(Para 12)
…In R v Briggs [2014] SASC 62 at [25], Sulan J referred to the comments that he made in Buhlmann and at [26], Sulan J also referred the decision of Kourakis CJ in R v Lombardi (2013) 115 SASR 577 at [22]-[24] where the Chief Justice said as follows: [22] It can be accepted that the term “special circumstances” can…