District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Blowers [2020] NSWDC 813 Hearing dates: 14-31 July 2020; 9 October 2020; 20 November 2020 Decision date: 27 November 2020 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Norrish QC DCJ Decision: Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 5 years; non-parole period 2 years 8 months.
Confiscation order for Apple iPhone
Catchwords: CRIME – sentence – use carriage service to transmit child pornography material
Legislation Cited: Commonwealth Crimes Act
Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act1999
Criminal Code(Cth)
Cases Cited: Hili & Jonesv R [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520
Holder and Anor v R (1983) 3 NSWLR 245
Jimmyv R [2010] NSWCCA 60
Johnson v R [2004] HCA 15; 78 ALJR 616
Mill v R (1988) 166 CLR 59
Minehan [2010] NSWCCA140
Pearce v R [1998] 194 CLR 610
Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (Crown)
Philip George Blowers (Offender)Representation: Counsel:
Ms P McEniery (DPP)
Mr G Stanton (Offender)
File Number(s): 2017/00294558 Publication restriction: Non publication order of the residential address of the accused
Judgment
-
Mr Blowers, my practice is to tell prisoners in advance what their sentence is going to be. I think that is the only humane and decent thing you can do. You are not interested on the intricacies of s 16A of the Commonwealth Crimes Act. I propose to sentence you to five year’s imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years, eight months imprisonment. That sentence will commence on the date you came into custody on 31 July 2020. On my orders you will be eligible for release to parole on 30 March 2023, and the sentence I fix will expire on 30 July 2025. I have been told by the Crown that I can fix an aggregate sentence pursuant to the State legislation under Commonwealth enabling powers. I propose to fix 25 indicative sentences, which I will explain, I will not give them to you now, but when I promulgate the formal orders I will give full details for the parties and I will ask my Associate to print out copies of the orders and they can be given to the parties. I now have to give my reasons.
-
Philip George Blowers appears today for sentence in respect of 25 offences after trial, bearing in mind he was found guilty by jury verdicts on 31 July 2020. Three offences are contrary to s 474.24A (1) Criminal Code (Cth) hereinafter to be referred to as “the Code”. These are offences of using a carriage service to transmit material, being child pornography material, on three or more separate occasions, on each such occasion involving two or more people. These are offences committed variously between 27 August 2017 and 27 September 2017. Each offence carries a maximum penalty of 25 years imprisonment. These offences overlap with 22 other offences contrary to s 474.19 (1) (a)…
Continue reading R v Blowers
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- R v Blowers [2020] NSWDC 813
- Case
- [2020] NSWDC 813
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included the appropriate weight to be given to various aggravating and mitigating factors in determining the sentence. The court considered the defendant's lack of previous convictions, his remorse, and the impact of the crime on the victims. Additionally, the court had to decide whether to impose a confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 in relation to the Apple iPhone used to commit the offence.
The court found that the offence was of significant gravity due to the nature of the material and the vulnerability of the victims. However, it also recognised the defendant's lack of previous convictions and his expressed remorse. The court ultimately determined that an aggregate term of imprisonment of 5 years, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 8 months, was appropriate. The court also made a confiscation order for the Apple iPhone used in the commission of the offence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 5 years; non-parole period 2 years 8 months.
Confiscation order for Apple iPhone
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.