R v Blowers

Case [2020] NSWDC 813


District Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: R v Blowers [2020] NSWDC 813
Hearing dates: 14-31 July 2020; 9 October 2020; 20 November 2020
Decision date: 27 November 2020
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Norrish QC DCJ
Decision:

Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 5 years; non-parole period 2 years 8 months.

Confiscation order for Apple iPhone

Catchwords:

CRIME – sentence – use carriage service to transmit child pornography material

Legislation Cited:

Commonwealth Crimes Act

Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act1999

Criminal Code(Cth)

Cases Cited:

Hili & Jonesv R [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520

Holder and Anor v R (1983) 3 NSWLR 245

Jimmyv R [2010] NSWCCA 60

Johnson v R [2004] HCA 15; 78 ALJR 616

Lyons v R [2017] NSWCCA 204

Mill v R (1988) 166 CLR 59

Minehan [2010] NSWCCA140

Pearce v R [1998] 194 CLR 610

Porte v R [2015] NSWCCA 174

R v Linardon [2014] NSWCCA 247

Category:Sentence
Parties: Regina (Crown)
Philip George Blowers (Offender)
Representation: Counsel:
Ms P McEniery (DPP)
Mr G Stanton (Offender)
File Number(s): 2017/00294558
Publication restriction: Non publication order of the residential address of the accused

Judgment

  1. Mr Blowers, my practice is to tell prisoners in advance what their sentence is going to be. I think that is the only humane and decent thing you can do. You are not interested on the intricacies of s 16A of the Commonwealth Crimes Act. I propose to sentence you to five year’s imprisonment with a non-parole period of two years, eight months imprisonment. That sentence will commence on the date you came into custody on 31 July 2020. On my orders you will be eligible for release to parole on 30 March 2023, and the sentence I fix will expire on 30 July 2025. I have been told by the Crown that I can fix an aggregate sentence pursuant to the State legislation under Commonwealth enabling powers. I propose to fix 25 indicative sentences, which I will explain, I will not give them to you now, but when I promulgate the formal orders I will give full details for the parties and I will ask my Associate to print out copies of the orders and they can be given to the parties. I now have to give my reasons.

  2. Philip George Blowers appears today for sentence in respect of 25 offences after trial, bearing in mind he was found guilty by jury verdicts on 31 July 2020. Three offences are contrary to s 474.24A (1) Criminal Code (Cth) hereinafter to be referred to as “the Code”. These are offences of using a carriage service to transmit material, being child pornography material, on three or more separate occasions, on each such occasion involving two or more people. These are offences committed variously between 27 August 2017 and 27 September 2017. Each offence carries a maximum penalty of 25 years imprisonment. These offences overlap with 22 other offences contrary to s 474.19 (1) (a)…

Continue reading R v Blowers

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
R v Blowers [2020] NSWDC 813
Case
[2020] NSWDC 813
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the court involved a conviction for using a carriage service to transmit child pornography material. The defendant, Blowers, was found guilty of this offence under the Criminal Code Act 1995. The court was tasked with determining an appropriate sentence for the crime. This case required the court to consider the gravity of the offence, the defendant's culpability, and any mitigating factors.

The legal issues before the court included the appropriate weight to be given to various aggravating and mitigating factors in determining the sentence. The court considered the defendant's lack of previous convictions, his remorse, and the impact of the crime on the victims. Additionally, the court had to decide whether to impose a confiscation order under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 in relation to the Apple iPhone used to commit the offence.

The court found that the offence was of significant gravity due to the nature of the material and the vulnerability of the victims. However, it also recognised the defendant's lack of previous convictions and his expressed remorse. The court ultimately determined that an aggregate term of imprisonment of 5 years, with a non-parole period of 2 years and 8 months, was appropriate. The court also made a confiscation order for the Apple iPhone used in the commission of the offence.

Orders

Orders of the court

Sentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment of 5 years; non-parole period 2 years 8 months.

Confiscation order for Apple iPhone

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.