SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
R v Black [2005] QCA 132
PARTIES:
R
v
BLACK, Natalie Louise
(applicant)FILE NO/S:
CA No 28 of 2005
SC No 783 of 2004DIVISION:
Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING:
Sentence Application
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
29 April 2005
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
19 April 2005
JUDGES:
McPherson and Williams JJA and Philippides J
Separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court, each concurring as to the order madeORDER:
Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
CATCHWORDS:
CRIMINAL LAW – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL AND INQUIRY AFTER CONVICTION – APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL AGAINST SENTENCE – APPEAL BY CONVICTED PERSONS – APPLICATIONS TO REDUCE SENTENCE – WHEN REFUSED – PARTICULAR OFFENCES – OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON – where applicant pleaded guilty to three counts of attempted murder – where sentenced to six years imprisonment with a recommendation for post-prison community-based release after serving 15 months – where applicant attempted to murder herself and her three children by carbon monoxide poisoning – where at the time the offences were committed, the applicant was suffering an adjustment disorder precipitated by the breakdown of her marriage to the children’s father – where the applicant was driven by malice towards the children’s father – where the applicant desisted from the attempt at the very last moment – where no prior criminal history – where plea of guilty entered at early stage – whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 (Qld), s 92
R v Bailey [2001] VSC 461; SC No 1491 of 2001, 22 November 2001, considered
R v Richards [2002] NSWSC 415; SC 70015 of 2002, 17 May 2002, considered
R v Skipper (1992) 64 A Crim R 260; CCA SCt of WA 121 of 1992, 4 December 1992, considered
R v Thew, unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal, NSW, No 60307 of 1998, 25 August 1998, considered
R v Treloar, unreported, de Jersey CJ, SC No 342 of 2001, 2 April 2002, consideredCOUNSEL:
K M McGinness for the applicant
R G Martin SC for the respondentSOLICITORS:
Legal Aid Queensland for the applicant
Director of Public Prosecutions (Queensland) for the respondent
McPHERSON JA: I agree with the reasons of Williams JA for dismissing this application to appeal against sentence.
WILLIAMS JA: The applicant seeks leave to appeal against a sentence of six years imprisonment with a recommendation for post-prison community-based release after serving 15 months which was imposed on each of three counts of attempted murder to which she pleaded guilty on 22 November 2004. The sentences were to be served concurrently. In fact the applicant was sentenced on 17 February 2005 and by then she had spent 87 days in custody; a declaration was made that that be time taken into account as part of the sentence.
The charges arose from the applicant's attempt to kill herself and her three children, Mersaydeez, born 27 December 1994,…
- AGLC
- R v Black [2005] QCA 132
- Case
- [2005] QCA 132
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive. The court had to consider the nature and circumstances of the offence, the offender’s culpability, and any relevant mitigating factors. In assessing the sentence, the court examined the plea of guilty entered at an early stage, the absence of prior criminal history, and the personal circumstances of the offender, including her mental health at the time of the offence. The court also had to weigh the need for punishment and deterrence against the possibility of rehabilitation.
The court found that the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive. The court recognised the gravity of the offence and the potential harm that could have resulted from the attempt. However, it also acknowledged the mitigating factors, including the plea of guilty, the absence of prior criminal history, and the personal circumstances of the offender. The court determined that the sentence was proportionate to the offence and took into account the need for punishment, deterrence, and rehabilitation. The application for leave to appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
The court did not make any orders beyond dismissing the application for leave to appeal against the sentence.
Orders
Orders of the court
Application for leave to appeal against sentence dismissed
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.