Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
10
-
VOT v The State of Western Australia
[2008] WASCA 102
Citation 1
…Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484 Bolton v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 277 Bull v The Queen [2000] HCA 24; (2000) 201 CLR 443 Goldsmith v Sandilands [2002] HCA 31; (2002) 76 ALJR 1024 Hill v The Queen [2003] WASCA 177 Jones v Bartlett [2000] HCA 56; (2000) 205 CLR 166 Libke v The Queen [2007] HCA 30; (200…
-
Bolton v The State of Western Australia
[2007] WASCA 277
Citation 2
…Ascoli v The Queen (Unreported, WASC, Library No 970173, 18 April 1997) Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484 Bull v The Queen [2000] HCA 24; (2000) 201 CLR 443 Dawson v The Queen (1961) 106 CLR 1 Hill v The Queen [2003] WASCA 177 R v Lear [1998] 1 VR 285 R v MAG [2004] QCA 397 R v Stergiou [2004] WASC 172; (2004) 147 A Crim…
-
MJH v The State of Western Australia
[2006] WASCA 167
Citation 3
(Para 18)
…re the issue is whether the acts took place, it would apply to any offence of which there is no extrinsic evidence and no disinterested witness ( Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484 at 494). It has also been said that to use it 'as a basis for departing from the general rule of finality would leave too wide a gap in that i…
-
R v Stergiou
[2004] WASC 172
Citation 4
(Para 4)
…it is not. In sexual cases the difference between questions going to credit and questions going to the issue is often 'reduced to vanishing point' ( Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484 per Kennedy J at 487 ‑ 488) in a way that is not present in this case."…
-
Millar v the Queen
[2003] WASCA 211
Citation 5
…Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484 Black v The Queen (1993) 179 CLR 44 Peers & Smitheringale v The Queen [1999] WASCA 295 R v Brown [1990] 1 Qd R 370 R v Creasey (1953) 37 Crim App R 179 R v Kirkman (1987) 44 SASR 591 R v Walhein (1952) 36 Crim App R 167 R v Watson & Ors [1988] 1 QB 690 Roberts v The Queen [2002] WASCA 64…
-
Hill v The Queen
[2003] WASCA 177
Citation 6
(Para 17)
…, particularly in sexual matters, that the difference between questions going to credit and questions going to the issues reduces to vanishing point: Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484 at 487‑488 per Kennedy J; Narkle v The Queen (2001) 23 WAR 468 at 480‑481 per Murray J; Hoy & Ors v The Queen ( supra ) at par 13 per Whee…
-
Hoy v The Queen
[2002] WASCA 275
Citation 7
(Para 1)
…It seems to me desirable briefly to examine the operation of s 21 of the Evidence Act , and the cases of Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484and Narkle v The Queen (2001) 23 WAR 468, since the submissions of counsel demonstrated considerable confusion in relation to these issues.…
-
Narkle v The Queen
[2001] WASCA 31
Citation 8
(Para 3)
…In this State the exclusionary principle was most recently discussed in Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484. That was a sexual assault case. The prosecution depended upon the evidence of the complainant. The defence was a denial that the events alleged had ever occurred. The complainant was cross‑examined to put to her tha…
-
Bull v The Queen
[2000] HCA 24
Citation 9
(Para 13)
…a step in an argument that she acted in a particular way on another occasion, which is what s 36BA renders inadmissible." [39](1993) 10 WAR 484. [40] Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484 at 486. [41] Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484 at 488.…
-
Milton v The Queen
[2000] WASCA 25
Citation 10
…Bannister v The Queen (1993) 10 WAR 484 Gallagher v The Queen (1986) 160 CLR 392 Gavin v The Queen (1992) 6 WAR 195 Mickelberg v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 259 R v Bond (1992) 62 A Crim R 383 Smith v The Queen (1993) 9 WAR 99 Davies and Cody v The King [1937] 57 CLR 170 Esther Investments Pty Ltd v Markalinga Pty Ltd (1989) 2 WA…
Statutory Material Cited
1
-
R v Yavuz
[2018] SASCFC 24
Citation 1
(Para 27)
…iscretion. I gratefully adopt the judgment of his Honour.[1] [1] I have also had regard to the discussion on this topic in the decisions in R v Yavuz [2018] SASCFC 24 and Re Skinner (2016) 126 SASR 120 @ [87]-[97].…
-
R v Fox
[2017] SASC 5
Citation 2
(Para 27)
…In his decision in R v Fox [2017] SASC 5, Hinton J thoroughly canvassed the statutory scheme surrounding the operation of s.10A of the Bail Act and the relevant considerations in the exercise of the court's discretion. I gratefully adopt the judgment of his Honour.[1] [1] I have also had regard to the discussion…
-
R v Skinner
[2016] SASCFC 106
Citation 3
(Para 27)
…e judgment of his Honour.[1] [1] I have also had regard to the discussion on this topic in the decisions in R v Yavuz [2018] SASCFC 24 and Re Skinner (2016) 126 SASR 120 @ [87]-[97].…
-
R v Lombardi
[2013] SASC 61
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…nces, the attack must rise to the level in effect of establishing that the prosecution case is irretrievably doomed to fail. [2] R v Lombardi (2013) 115 SASR 577 per Kourakis CJ. [3] R v Buhlmann [2010] SASC 123 per Sulan J.…
-
R v Buhlmann
[2010] SASC 123
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…stablishing that the prosecution case is irretrievably doomed to fail. [2] R v Lombardi (2013) 115 SASR 577 per Kourakis CJ. [3] R v Buhlmann [2010] SASC 123 per Sulan J.…