Queensland v Commonwealth
Case
•
[1987] HCA 2
•3 February 1987
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Queensland v Commonwealth [1987] HCA 2
[1987] HCA 2
3 February 1987
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The High Court of Australia considered a dispute between the State of Queensland and the Commonwealth of Australia concerning the validity of certain provisions of the *Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918* (Cth) and the *Parliamentary Electorates and Boundaries Act 1973* (Cth). Queensland challenged the constitutional validity of these Commonwealth laws, which established a federal redistribution process for electoral divisions.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the Commonwealth legislation, by prescribing a detailed and mandatory process for the redistribution of federal electoral divisions, impermissibly encroached upon the residual legislative powers of the States or otherwise infringed upon the constitutional framework governing the relationship between the Commonwealth and the States. Specifically, the Court had to determine if the Commonwealth's power to make laws with respect to "elections" under section 24 of the Constitution extended to dictating the manner in which State electoral boundaries were to be drawn for federal purposes, and whether such legislation was consistent with the implied constitutional principle of State integrity.
The Court ultimately held that the Commonwealth legislation was valid. The majority reasoned that the power of the Commonwealth Parliament to make laws with respect to "elections" under section 24 of the Constitution was broad enough to encompass the establishment of a comprehensive scheme for the redistribution of electoral divisions. This power was seen as essential to ensuring the effective and fair conduct of federal elections, a core Commonwealth responsibility. The Court rejected the argument that the legislation infringed upon State powers, finding that the Commonwealth was legislating in relation to federal elections, not State elections, and that the process established did not usurp any essential State legislative function. The principle of State integrity, while recognised, was not considered to be violated by this exercise of Commonwealth legislative power.
The High Court dismissed Queensland's challenge, upholding the constitutional validity of the Commonwealth Electoral Act and the Parliamentary Electorates and Boundaries Act.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the Commonwealth legislation, by prescribing a detailed and mandatory process for the redistribution of federal electoral divisions, impermissibly encroached upon the residual legislative powers of the States or otherwise infringed upon the constitutional framework governing the relationship between the Commonwealth and the States. Specifically, the Court had to determine if the Commonwealth's power to make laws with respect to "elections" under section 24 of the Constitution extended to dictating the manner in which State electoral boundaries were to be drawn for federal purposes, and whether such legislation was consistent with the implied constitutional principle of State integrity.
The Court ultimately held that the Commonwealth legislation was valid. The majority reasoned that the power of the Commonwealth Parliament to make laws with respect to "elections" under section 24 of the Constitution was broad enough to encompass the establishment of a comprehensive scheme for the redistribution of electoral divisions. This power was seen as essential to ensuring the effective and fair conduct of federal elections, a core Commonwealth responsibility. The Court rejected the argument that the legislation infringed upon State powers, finding that the Commonwealth was legislating in relation to federal elections, not State elections, and that the process established did not usurp any essential State legislative function. The principle of State integrity, while recognised, was not considered to be violated by this exercise of Commonwealth legislative power.
The High Court dismissed Queensland's challenge, upholding the constitutional validity of the Commonwealth Electoral Act and the Parliamentary Electorates and Boundaries Act.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Constitutional Law
-
Statutory Interpretation
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Jurisdiction
-
Standing
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Queensland v Commonwealth [1987] HCA 2
Most Recent Citation
Accident Compensation Tribunal v Commissioner of Taxation [1992] FCA 12 (92 ATC 4039; (1992) 23 ATR 39; (1992) 105 ALR 427; (1992) 34 FCR 1)
Cases Citing This Decision
15
Austin v Commonwealth
[2003] HCA 3
SGH Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
[2002] HCA 18
South Australia v Commonwealth
[1992] HCA 7
Cases Cited
14
Statutory Material Cited
0
Whitehouse v Queensland
[1961] HCA 55
Tamar Timber Trading Co Pty Ltd v Pilkington
[1968] HCA 15
R v Phillips
[1970] HCA 50