Legal Research
Cases
Primary RE Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd

Primary RE Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd

Case [2011] VSC 242

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Primary RE Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd [2011] VSC 242
Case: [2011] VSC 242
Decision Date: 8 June 2011

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Primary RE Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd [2011] VSC 242

Most Recent Citation

Crea v Latife [2023] VCC 236

Cases Citing This Decision

Thistle Investment Pty Ltd v MXL Investment Pty Ltd [2024] QSC 247
Citation 1 (Para 1)

…QB 79, 91 and Chelfield Pty Ltd v Goldsea Pty Ltd; Re WC Pty Ltd [2003] 2 Qd R 243, [17]. [41] Primary RE Ltd v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd [2011] VSC 242, [147]. [42] Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney South West Area Health Service [2010] NSWCA 268, [308] (‘ Macquarie International…
Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney Local Health District [2019] NSWSC 1199
Citation 2

…liq) [2011] QCA 162 Primary RE Ltd v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd [2011] VSC 242 Radray Constructions v Hornsby Shire Council [2006] NSWLEC 155; (2006) 145 LGERA 292 Renard Constructions (ME) Pty Ltd v Minister for Public Works (1992) 26 NSWLR 234 Rinehart v Hancock Prospecting Pty Ltd [2019] HCA 13 Secur…
Al Jadeed TV v United Broadcasting International Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 983
Citation 3 (Para 2)

…AC at 780 per Lord Hoffman. The approach of Lord Steyn was relied upon by Judd J in Primary RE Ltd v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd [2011] VSC 242 at [117].…
Great Southern Managers Australia Ltd (in Liq) in Its Capacity as Responsible Entity of the Managed Investment Schemes Listed in Schedule 1 v Thackray [No 3] [2011] WASC 195
Citation 4

…ealand Banking Group Ltd [2011] VSC 255 Chandless-Chandless v Nicholson [1942] 2 KB 321 Primary RE Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Limited [2011] VSC 242 Re Timbercorp Securities Ltd (in liq) (2009) 74 ACSR 626 Warner v Sampson [1958] 1 QB 404; (1958) 1 All ER 314…
Club Fogolar Furlan Melbourne v Paramount Investments Group Pty Ltd [2024] VSC 208
Citation 5 (Para 1)

…cant says that this is insufficient having regard to the operation of s 57 of the RLA. [31] Primary RE Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Ltd [2011] VSC 242 [105]. [32]Ibid.…
Vincent Cold Storage Pty Ltd v Centuria Property Funds No 2 Limited [2022] VSC 766
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…where Judd J undertook a detailed analysis as to the validity of notices served under various statutory provisions including s 146 of the PLA. [16][2011] VSC 242.…
Caltex v Agtan [2017] VSC 593
Citation 7

…ngs.[120] [119]CCS [45]; Beamer, [443]-[444] [citations omitted]; and see Primary RE Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Limited & Ors [2011] VSC 242, [183]. [120]CCS [45](a); Lindsay Affidavit, [15].…
Derrimut Health & Fitness P/L v Aretzis Properties P/L [2025] SADC 131
Citation 8 (Para 17)

…C Pty Ltd (Okami) [2024] SASC 151 [16]. [6] Primary Re Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liq) [2011] VSC 242 [183] citing Lord Wilberforce in Shiloh Spinners Ltd v Harding [1973] AC 691, 721-725 and endorsed by the High Court in Legione v Hateley (1983) 152…
Cassar & Richards v Mitchell [2025] VCC 820
Citation 9

…ty Law Act 1958 (Vic) Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57, Primary RE Ltd v Great Southern Property Holdings [2011] VSC 242, Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney South West Area Health Service [2010] NSWCA 268, Tymbook Pty Ltd v Victoria [2006] 15 VR65, S…
ReSource Pty Ltd v Shea Investments Pty Ltd [2024] VCC 1248
Citation 10

…Planning and Environment Act 1987 Cases Cited: Primary RE Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Limited [2011] VSC 242; Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney South West Area Health Service [2010] NSWCA 268; Craine v Colonial Mutual Fire Insurance Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 305; Crown Melbourne Lt…
Crea v Latife [2023] VCC 236
Citation 11

…113 CLR 295; Primary RE Limited v Great Southern Property Holdings Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liquidation) & Ors [2011] VSC 242; Rossi Recycling Pty Ltd v Buckland Valley Pty Ltd [2022] VSC 467; S & E Promotions Pty Ltd v Tobin Brothers Pty Ltd (1994) 122 ALR 637; Sara Investments (NSW) Pty L…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Macquarie International Health Clinic Pty Ltd v Sydney South West Area Health Service [2010] NSWCA 268
Citation 1

…Area Health Service ;[4] Fletcher v Nokes ;[5] Fox v Jolly ;[6] Progressive Mailing House v Tabali ;[7] World Best Holdings Ltd v Sarker. [8] [4][2010] NSWCA 268, [307]-[324]. [5][1897] 1 Ch 271, 274. [6][1916] 1 AC 1, 17. [7](1985) 157 CLR 17, 34. [8][2010] NSWCA 24, [44]. (2)Consequently, the provisions must be…
World Best Holdings Ltd v Sarker [2010] NSWCA 24
Citation 2

…rld Best Holdings Ltd v Sarker. [8] [4][2010] NSWCA 268, [307]-[324]. [5][1897] 1 Ch 271, 274. [6][1916] 1 AC 1, 17. [7](1985) 157 CLR 17, 34. [8][2010] NSWCA 24, [44]. (2)Consequently, the provisions must be interpreted by reference to their remedial object and purpose. (3)The parties to a lease may not contract…
Natwest Markets Australia Pty Ltd v Tenth Vandy Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 207
Citation 3

…dial object and purpose. (3)The parties to a lease may not contract out of the benefit conveyed on the lessee by the statutory provisions.[9] [9] Natwest Markets Australia Pty Ltd v Tenth Vandy Pty Ltd (2008) 21 VR 68 at [34]; By way of example, s 146(13) of the Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) provides, “This section shall have effect notwithstanding any stipulati…
Progressive Mailing House Pty Ltd v Tabali Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 14
Citation 4

…ing House v Tabali ;[7] World Best Holdings Ltd v Sarker. [8] [4][2010] NSWCA 268, [307]-[324]. [5][1897] 1 Ch 271, 274. [6][1916] 1 AC 1, 17. [7](1985) 157 CLR 17, 34. [8][2010] NSWCA 24, [44]. (2)Consequently, the provisions must be interpreted by reference to their remedial object and purpose. (3)The parties to a…
Godecke v Kirwan [1973] HCA 38
Citation 5

…r unacceptably uncertain: contrast, eg, May and Butcher Ltd v The King [1934] 2 KB 17(n) and the comment of Gibbs J in Godecke v Kirwan (1973) 129 CLR 629 at 646-647. (c)Where there is a readily ascertainable external standard which is proved, the court will have regard to it in order to add flesh to the provision wh…
Placer Development Ltd v The Commonwealth [1969] HCA 29
Citation 6

…ween terms which are illusory and those which are real but uncertain. They do so in their joint judgment in Placer Development Ltd v The Commonwealth (1969) 121 CLR 353 at 359-360: “… a promise to pay an unspecified amount of money is not enforceable where it expressly appears that the amount to be paid is to rest in…
Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling and Freezing Co Ltd [1968] HCA 8
Citation 7

…he agreement between them: see Meehan (at 589); see also Barwick CJ in Upper Hunter County District Council v Australian Chilling and Freezing Co Ltd (1968) 118 CLR 429 at 437 where his Honour said that: “… In the search for that intention, no narrow or pedantic approach is warranted, particularly in the case of comm…
Axelsen v O'Brien [1949] HCA 18
Citation 8

…rd party who is given power to settle ambiguities and uncertainties: see, eg, Foster v Wheeler (1888) 38 Ch D 130 and Axelsen v O'Brien (1949) 80 CLR 219. (b)But even then, if the term is so vital that leaving it to one only of the parties unacceptably removes certainty in the arrangement, the court may or may not r…
Gerraty v McGavin [1914] HCA 23
Citation 9

…liant notices of default on each sub-lessee, or in the present cases, the growers. [11] Penton v Barnett [1898] 1 QB 276, 281; Gerrarty v McGavin (1914) 18 CLR 152, 159; Fletcher v Nokes , supra; Fox v Jolly , supra; Horsey Estates Ltd v Steiger [1899] 2 QB 79, 91. [12] Penton v Barnett [1898] 1 QB 276, 281.…

AI Chat coming soon