Pittwater Council v Bolitho

Case [2007] NSWLEC 355



Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: Pittwater Council v Bolitho [2007] NSWLEC 355
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Pittwater Council

RESPONDENT
Kim Bolitho
FILE NUMBER(S): 40310; 40311 of 2007
CORAM: Preston CJ
KEY ISSUES: Civil Enforcement :- statutory orders to remove horses - injunctions sought to enforce statutory orders - Court has discretion to grant or withhold relief - not proper exercise of discretion to enforce a statutory order that should not have been issued - keeping of horses in an inappropriate manner - relief should be proportionate response - appropriate order is to require measures to be taken to keep horses in appropriate manner not removal of horses - costs
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) s76A, s121B, s121ZK, s122(a), b(v), s123(1), s124(1)
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s69(2)
Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) s124, s180, s672(a), (b)(ii), s673(1), s676(1)
Local Government (General) Regulation, cl 92, cl 21(4), Part 5 of Schedule 2
CASES CITED: F Hannan v Electricity Commission of NSW [No 3] (1985) 66 LGRA 306;
Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403;
Liverpool City Council v Roads and Traffic Authority and Interlink Roads Pty Ltd (1991) 74 LGRA 265;
Liverpool City Council v Roads and Traffic Authority and Interlink Roads Pty Ltd (No.2) (1992) 75 LGRA 210;
Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act v New South Wales Aboriginal Land Council (1993) 80 LGERA 173;
Royal Agricultural Society of NSW v City of Sydney Council (1987) 61 LGRA 305;
Shire of Perth v O'Keefe (1964) 110 CLR 529;
Warringah Shire Council v Raffles (1978) 38 LGRA 306;
Warringah Shire Council v Sedevcic (1987) 10 NSWLR 335
DATES OF HEARING: 25 May 2007
29 May 2007
30 May 2007
 
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 

1 June 2007
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
R Lancaster (Barrister)
SOLICITORS
Mallesons Stephen Jaques

RESPONDENT
Kim Bolitho (in person)
SOLICITORS
N/A



JUDGMENT:

        THE LAND AND
        ENVIRONMENT COURT
        OF NEW SOUTH WALES

        PRESTON CJ

        1 JUNE 2007

        40310 OF 2007
        40311 OF 2007

        PITTWATER COUNCIL V BOLITHO

        JUDGMENT

1 HIS HONOUR: Pittwater Council seeks injunctive relief requiring Ms Bolitho to remove two horses from her residential property at Clareville and to take certain remedial steps to clean up the area used by the horses.

2 The Council moved the Court on 18 May 2007 for interlocutory injunctive relief for the removal of the horses. Talbot J declined to grant interlocutory injunctive relief but instead expedited the final hearing of the proceedings, listing them before the duty judge one week later on Friday, 25 May 2007.

3 The work commitments of both the duty judge and other judges of the Court on that day, together with the fact that a final hearing of the proceedings clearly would take in excess of one day, meant that it was not possible to complete any hearing of the proceedings on the day fixed for trial. Nevertheless, it was possible for the hearing of the proceedings to be commenced before me in the afternoon of 25…

Continue reading Pittwater Council v Bolitho

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Pittwater Council v Bolitho [2007] NSWLEC 355
Case
[2007] NSWLEC 355
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Pittwater Council sought relief from the Land and Environment Court in relation to the keeping of horses on property owned by Kim Bolitho. The Council sought declarations and injunctive relief requiring Ms Bolitho to remove horses from her property and to take certain remedial steps to clean up the area used by the horses. The Court was asked to grant relief for breaches of two statutory orders issued by the Council. The Court found that neither of the statutory orders could be properly issued and, accordingly, the relief sought by the Council was not appropriate. Instead, the Court found that the appropriate relief would be for the respondent to take steps to complete the fence around the horse area, install a double gate to allow vehicular access to the property, install an adequate drainage system for the horse area, and to formalise a regime for cleaning and maintaining the horse area. The Court ordered each party to bear their own costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.