FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Phillips v Southage Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 332
Citation: Phillips v Southage Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 332 Appeal from: Phillips v Southage Pty Ltd [2015] FCCA 223 Parties: STEVE PHILLIPS v SOUTHAGE PTY LTD File number(s): VID 59 of 2015 Judge(s): DAVIES J Date of judgment: 7 April 2015 Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – Appeal from decision of Federal Circuit Court to dismiss application for review of orders of a Registrar which dismissed appellant’s application to set aside bankruptcy notice pursuant to s 40(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – no error of law demonstrated – appeal dismissed Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) s 40(1)(g)
Settled Land Act 1958 (Vic) s 12
Property Law Act 1958 (Vic) s 25Cases cited: Burrell v Connell (1998) 84 FCR 383
Re O’Sullivan; Ex parte O’Sullivan v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (1995) 57 FCR 145
Lawindi; Re Elkateb v Elkateb (2001) 187 ALR 479; [2001] FCA 1527
Hiralal v Hiralal [2013] NSWSC 984
Baldry v Jackson [1976] NSWLR 19
Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia) [1995] FCA 1687Date of hearing: 7 April 2015 Place: Melbourne Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 11 Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person Counsel for the Respondent: Mr B Velos Solicitor for the Respondent: Velos Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
VID 59 of 2015
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: STEVE PHILLIPS
AppellantAND: SOUTHAGE PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE:
DAVIES J
DATE OF ORDER:
7 APRIL 2015
WHERE MADE:
MELBOURNE
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The appeal be dismissed.
2.The appellant pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
VID 59 of 2015
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: STEVE PHILLIPS
AppellantAND: SOUTHAGE PTY LTD
Respondent
JUDGE:
DAVIES J
DATE:
7 APRIL 2015
PLACE:
MELBOURNE
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT)
The appellant (“Mr Phillips”), who represents himself, has appealed the decision of the Federal Circuit Court (“FCC”) dismissing his application for review of the order of a Registrar of this Court dismissing his application to set aside a bankruptcy notice. The bankruptcy notice was founded on orders for costs made in favour of the respondent against Mr Phillips by the Victorian Court of Appeal, which dismissed Mr Phillip’s application for an extension of time for leave to appeal against orders made by the Supreme Court of Victoria in two separate proceedings. Mr Phillips’ application for special leave to appeal to the High Court from the decision of the Court of Appeal was also dismissed.
The grounds upon which Mr Phillips applied to have the bankruptcy notice set aside were that:
(a)the service of the bankruptcy notice upon him was an abuse of process by reason that it was served…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Phillips v Southage Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2015] FCA 332
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the arguments advanced by Mr. Phillips and found that he had not demonstrated any error of law in the decision of the Federal Circuit Court. The court noted that the appellant had failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claim that the bankruptcy notice was issued in error. The court found that the Federal Circuit Court had correctly applied the relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy Act and had adequately considered the evidence and arguments presented. Consequently, the court determined that there was no basis to set aside the orders of the Registrar or the decision of the Federal Circuit Court.
Based on the above reasoning, the appeal was dismissed. Additionally, the court ordered that the appellant pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal, in accordance with Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. This ruling underscores the importance of providing adequate evidence to support claims in bankruptcy proceedings and the stringent scrutiny applied to applications to set aside bankruptcy notices.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The appeal be dismissed.
2. The appellant pay the respondent’s costs of the appeal.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.