Peter Stoitse Transport Pty Ltd

Case [2021] FWCA 6914


[2021] FWCA 6914

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Peter Stoitse Transport Pty Ltd

(AG2021/8130)

Peter Stoitse Transport Milk Enterprise Agreement 2021

Road transport industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT MANSINI

MELBOURNE, 30 NOVEMBER 2021

Application for approval of the Peter Stoitse Transport Milk Enterprise Agreement 2021.

  1. Application has been made for approval of a single enterprise agreement known as the Peter Stoitse Transport Milk Enterprise Agreement 2021 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act).

  1. The application was accompanied by a signature page that did not comply in all respects with Regulation 2.06A of the Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) (the Regulations). An amended signature page was subsequently filed. I consider it appropriate in the circumstances to waive an irregularity in the form or manner in which an application was made, and do so pursuant to s.586(b).

  1. Since the application was made, the Commission raised concerns about whether the Agreement passes the “better off overall” test and contains the mandatory terms.

  1. Written undertakings were given in accordance with s.190 of the Act and are attached at Annexure A (Undertakings). The bargaining representatives either supported or did not oppose the Undertakings. I am satisfied that the Undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the Undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. Pursuant to s.201(3) of the Act, the Undertakings are taken to be terms of the Agreement.

  1. The model consultation term prescribed by the Regulations is taken to be a term of the Agreement, pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act.

  1. Noting clause 3 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the National Employment Standards in the Act (NES) will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. On the basis of the material contained in the application, further information provided on request of the Commission and the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

  1. The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act. In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

  1. The Agreement was approved on 30 November 2021 and, in accordance with s.54, will operate from 7 December 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 July 2024.


DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE514095  PR736311>

Annexure A

Details
AGLC
Peter Stoitse Transport Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 6914
Case
[2021] FWCA 6914
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Peter Stoitse Transport Pty Ltd, the applicant, and the Fair Work Commission, the respondent, the Fair Work Commission was asked to approve a proposed enterprise agreement for the milk transportation industry. The applicant argued that the proposed agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms for employees. The Fair Work Commission, as the respondent, was tasked with determining whether the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement complied with the requirements of the Fair Work Act, particularly sections 230 and 231. The applicant needed to demonstrate that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including minimum rates of pay, maximum ordinary hours of work, and other employment conditions. The Commission also needed to consider whether the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and whether it had been fairly negotiated.

The Fair Work Commission, after reviewing the evidence and submissions from both parties, found that the proposed agreement met the statutory requirements for approval. The Commission noted that the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including minimum rates of pay and maximum ordinary hours of work. The Commission also found that the agreement had been fairly negotiated and was in the best interests of the employees. The Commission approved the proposed agreement, subject to certain conditions, including the requirement that the applicant provide notice of any changes to the agreement to the Commission.

The Fair Work Commission approved the proposed enterprise agreement for the milk transportation industry, subject to certain conditions. The applicant must provide notice of any changes to the agreement to the Commission. The agreement provides for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment, including minimum rates of pay and maximum ordinary hours of work. The Commission found that the agreement had been fairly negotiated and was in the best interests of the employees.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.