Legal Research
Cases
Perfect Choice Travel Australia Pty Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions

Perfect Choice Travel Australia Pty Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions

Case [2024] VCC 714

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Perfect Choice Travel Australia Pty Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions [[2024]] VCC 714
Case: [2024] VCC 714
Decision Date: 27 May 2024

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Perfect Choice Travel Australia Pty Ltd v Director of Public Prosecutions [[2024]] VCC 714

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Taylor v Attorney-General (Cth) [2019] HCA 30
Citation 1

…iderations and matters of degree. There is no point trying to define the statutory expression, as each case will turn on its own facts: Taylor v Attorney-General (SA) (1991) 55 SASR 462 at 471, Debelle J. However, in considering the meaning of the statutory expression, it is relevant to bear in mind that the composite expression that h…
Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Courtenay Investments Ltd [2016] WASCA 194
Citation 2

…20-24 50The point was mentioned in passing in the trial decision of Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Courtenay Investments Ltd [2016] WASCA 194. In that case the trial Judge His Honour Justice Edelman considered the issue of whether a restraining order ought be discharged. That involved a considerati…
Henderson v Queensland [2014] HCA 52
Citation 3

…Penrose (No 2) [2016] VSC 191 , CGL v DPP (2010) 234 VR 486 , R v Milenkovic (2005) 158 A Crim R 4; Henderson v Queensland [2014] HCA 52; Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) ALR 449; Periera v DPP (1988) 63 ALR 1 Judgment:…
R v Chalmers [2012] SASCFC 128
Citation 4

…Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298; Chalmers v R (2011) 37 VR 464; [2011] VSCA 436; Director of Public Prosecutions v George [2008] SASC 330 , Masters Home Improvement Australia Pty Ltd v North East Solutions Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 88 , R v Pen…
ROSE & BAUDIN [2012] FamCAFC 171
Citation 5

…g Yen Le v DPP (2007) 171 A Crim R 196; Grillo v DPP [2011] VSC 575; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298; Chalmers v R (2011) 37 VR 464; [2011] VSCA 436; Director of Public Prosecutions v George [2008] SASC 330 , Masters Home Improvement Austral…
Chalmers v The Queen [2011] VSCA 436
Citation 6

…inshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298; Chalmers v R (2011) 37 VR 464; [2011] VSCA 436; Director of Public Prosecutions v George [2008] SASC 330 , Masters Home Improvement Australia Pty Ltd v North East Solutions Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 88 , R v Penrose (No 2) [2016…
Director of Public Prosecutions v George [2008] SASC 330
Citation 7

…Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298; Chalmers v R (2011) 37 VR 464; [2011] VSCA 436; Director of Public Prosecutions v George [2008] SASC 330 , Masters Home Improvement Australia Pty Ltd v North East Solutions Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 88 , R v Penrose (No 2) [2016] VSC 191 , CGL v DPP (2010) 234 VR 486 , R v Milenkovic (…
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Haneef [2007] FCAFC 209
Citation 8

…owner. That is a matter to be borne in mind in determining the application of the statutory expression in the present context: see Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Haneef (2007) 163 FCR 414; [2007] FCAFC 203 at [105]-[113]. … As a matter of ordinary language, and bearing in mind that the word defined is “instrument”, I consider that the defini…
Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22
Citation 9

…s Cited: Hong Yen Le v DPP (2007) 171 A Crim R 196; Grillo v DPP [2011] VSC 575; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298; Chalmers v R (2011) 37 VR 464; [2011] VSCA 436; Director of Public Prosecutions v George [2008] SASC 330 , Masters Home Improve…
Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 9
Citation 10

…illo v DPP [2011] VSC 575; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298; Chalmers v R (2011) 37 VR 464; [2011] VSCA 436; Director of Public Prosecutions v George [2008] SASC 330 , Masters Home Improvement Australia Pty Ltd v North East Solutions P…
Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 36
Citation 11

…gislation Cited: Confiscation Act 1997 Cases Cited: Hong Yen Le v DPP (2007) 171 A Crim R 196; Grillo v DPP [2011] VSC 575; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298; Chalmers v R (2011) 37 VR 464; [2011] VSCA 436; Director of Public Prosecutions v George [2008]…
Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34
Citation 12

…ation Act 1997 Cases Cited: Hong Yen Le v DPP (2007) 171 A Crim R 196; Grillo v DPP [2011] VSC 575; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298; Chalmers v R (2011) 37 VR 464; [2011] VSCA 436; Director of Public Prosecutions v George [2008] SASC 330 ,…
Taylor v Attorney-General for the Commonwealth [2018] HCATrans 244
Citation 13

…e. There is no point trying to define the statutory expression, as each case will turn on its own facts: Taylor v Attorney-General (SA) (1991) 55 SASR 462 at 471, Debelle J. However, in considering the meaning of the statutory expression, it is relevant to bear in mind that the composite expression that has been used…
Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd [1992] HCATrans 297
Citation 14

…v Milenkovic (2005) 158 A Crim R 4; Henderson v Queensland [2014] HCA 52; Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) ALR 449; Periera v DPP (1988) 63 ALR 1 Judgment:…
Pham v Director of Public Prosecutions [2017] VSC 261
Citation 15 (Para 79)

…ove knowing involvement by the applicant, rather the onus is on the applicant to prove otherwise.”[156] She has not so proven. [156] Pham v DPP [2017] VSC 261 at [79] 151To summarise my findings: (a) Diem Pham is unable to discharge her onus in respect of that property which is admitted to be tainted property bei…
R v Penrose (Ruling No 2) [2016] VSC 191
Citation 16

…8] SASC 330 , Masters Home Improvement Australia Pty Ltd v North East Solutions Pty Ltd [2017] VSCA 88 , R v Penrose (No 2) [2016] VSC 191 , CGL v DPP (2010) 234 VR 486 , R v Milenkovic (2005) 158 A Crim R 4; Henderson v Queensland [2014] HCA 52; Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) ALR 449; Pe…
Grillo v Director of Public Prosecutions [2011] VSC 575
Citation 17

…ence evidence Legislation Cited: Confiscation Act 1997 Cases Cited: Hong Yen Le v DPP (2007) 171 A Crim R 196; Grillo v DPP [2011] VSC 575; Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336; Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; Jones v Dunkel [1959] 101 CLR 298; Chalmers v R (2011) 37 VR 464; [2011] VSCA 436; Director of Publ…

AI Chat coming soon