FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Paule v Kambouris [2025] FCA 474
File number(s): NSD 403 of 2025
NSD 404 of 2025Judgment of: NEEDHAM J Date of judgment: 5 May 2025 Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – Urgent interim applications to extend time for compliance with Bankruptcy Notices arising out of proceedings in the NSW Supreme Court until 4pm on the date application listed for hearing – extension of time application rejected by Judicial Registrar – application to review Judicial Registrar’s decision proposed – Notice of Appeal filed in the NSW Court of Appeal to be heard on 20 June 2025 – extension of time granted Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 41(6A), 120, 121 Cases cited: Sockhill v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 178 ALR 113; [2000] FCA 1208 Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency Number of paragraphs: 8 Date of hearing: 5 May 2025 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M Davis Solicitor for the Applicant: Corrs Chambers Westgarth Counsel for the Respondents: Mr D Birch Solicitor for the Respondents: McCabes ORDERS
NSD 403 of 2025 BETWEEN: TERRY PAULE
Applicant
AND: AMBROSIOS KAMBOURIS
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
NEEDHAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
5 MAY 2025
THE COURT NOTES THAT:
1. On the applicant giving the undertaking that he will not deal with:
a. the Toorak Property (being a residential property located at 63 Albany Road, Toorak, Victoria); or
b. any other property owned by the applicant and for which the applicant holds the beneficial interest, other than in the course of ordinary business,
during the course of these proceedings and, if the relief he seeks is granted in these proceedings, until 21 days after the determination of the Notice of Appeal filed on 19 March 2025 in the New South Wales Court of Appeal,
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
2. The applicant file an application for review of the orders of Judicial Registrar Birchall dated 5 May 2025 by 4pm on 8 May 2025 (the review application).
3. Pursuant to s 41(6A) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), the time for compliance with Bankruptcy Notice Number BN276549 issued on 28 February 2025, and served on 6 March 2025, be extended until 4pm on the date of the first hearing before a judge in the review application or until further order.
4. The applicant to file and serve any further evidence in chief to be relied on at the final hearing by 8 May 2025.
5. The respondent to file and serve any evidence to be relied on at the final hearing by 14 May 2025.
6. The applicant to file and serve any reply evidence to be relied on at the final hearing by 16 May 2025.
7. The matter be referred to the National Operations Registry for allocation to a Docket Judge, with the intention that the matter be listed for hearing at 10:15am on 19 May 2025, with an estimate of half a day.
Continue reading Paule v Kambouris
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Paule v Kambouris [2025] FCA 474
- Case
- [2025] FCA 474
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to consider the procedural fairness in handling the application for an extension of time, as well as the merits of the application itself. It had to determine whether the Judicial Registrar’s decision to reject the extension of time was correct and whether the proposed application for review was in accordance with the relevant legal provisions. The court also needed to evaluate the urgency and merits of the applicant’s request for an extension of time to comply with the Bankruptcy Notice.
In its reasoning, the court found that the Judicial Registrar’s decision did not adequately consider the procedural fairness in handling the application for an extension of time. Consequently, the court granted the application for an extension of time and outlined specific procedural steps that needed to be followed. The applicant was instructed to file an application for review of the Judicial Registrar’s decision by a specified deadline. Furthermore, the court set out detailed timelines for the filing and serving of evidence for the final hearing, and allocated the matter to a Docket Judge for further consideration. The court reserved the decision on costs.
In summary, the court granted the application for an extension of time and outlined specific procedural steps for the review application. It set deadlines for the filing and serving of evidence, allocated the matter to a Docket Judge, and reserved the decision on costs. The matter is now scheduled for hearing on 19 May 2025, with liberty for the parties to apply to the Duty Judge on short notice.
Orders
Orders of the court
2. The applicant file an application for review of the orders of Judicial Registrar Birchall dated 5 May 2025 by 4pm on 8 May 2025 (the review application).
3. Pursuant to s 41(6A) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), the time for compliance with Bankruptcy Notice Number BN276550 issued on 3 March 2025, and served on 6 March 2025, be extended until 4pm on the date of the first hearing before a judge in the review application or until further order.
4. The applicant to file and serve any further evidence in chief to be relied on at the final hearing by 8 May 2025.
5. The respondent to file and serve any evidence to be relied on at the final hearing by 14 May 2025.
6. The applicant to file and serve any reply evidence to be relied on at the final hearing by 16 May 2025.
7. The matter be referred to the National Operations Registry for allocation to a Docket Judge, with the intention that the matter be listed for hearing at 10:15am on 19 May 2025, with an estimate of half a day.
8. Liberty to the parties to apply to the Duty Judge on 2 days’ notice.
9. Costs reserved.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.