Parsons v The Queen

Case [2000] WASCA 407


PARSONS -v- THE QUEEN [2000] WASCA 407



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2000] WASCA 407
COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Case No:CCA:124/200014 SEPTEMBER 2000
Coram:PIDGEON J
WALLWORK J
WHEELER J
20/12/00
11Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Appeal allowed
Sentence reduced to a term of 2 years
PDF Version
Parties:COREY LAWRENCE PARSONS
THE QUEEN

Catchwords:

Criminal Law & Procedure
Sentencing
Dangerous driving causing death
18 year old offender
Utility overturned in an area of road works
Culpable driving for a considerable distance earlier
Remorse shown
3 year sentence reduced to 2 years
Turns on own facts

Legislation:

Road Traffic Act

Case References:

Bropho v R, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 940197; 14 April 1994
Colbung v R [1999] WASCA 138
R v White [2000] WASCA 118
Smith v The Queen [1976] WAR 97

Ainsworth v D (A Child) (1992) 7 WAR 102
Atholwood v The Queen (1999) 109 A Crim R 465
Fleming v The Queen, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 970005; 17 January 1997
Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665
MacKereth v The Queen (1991) 12 MVR 463
Pinkstone v The Queen [2000] WASCA 228
Punch v The Queen (1993) 9 WAR 486
R v Bowers (1996) 23 MVR 489
R v Guilfoyle [1973] 2 All ER 844
R v Jurisic (1998) 101 A Crim R 259
R v Sheppard (1995) 77 A Crim R 139
R v Stebbings (1990) 4 WAR 538
R v Tait (1979) 46 FLR 386

JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TITLE OF COURT : COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL CITATION : PARSONS -v- THE QUEEN [2000] WASCA 407 CORAM : PIDGEON J
    WALLWORK J
    WHEELER J
HEARD : 14 SEPTEMBER 2000 DELIVERED : 20 DECEMBER 2000 FILE NO/S : CCA 124 of 2000 BETWEEN : COREY LAWRENCE PARSONS
    Applicant

    AND

    THE QUEEN
    Respondent



Catchwords:

Criminal Law & Procedure - Sentencing - Dangerous driving causing death - 18 year old offender - Utility overturned in an area of road works - Culpable driving for a considerable distance earlier - Remorse shown - 3 year sentence reduced to 2 years - Turns on own facts




Legislation:

Road Traffic Act




Result:

Appeal allowed


Sentence reduced to a term of 2 years


(Page 2)

Representation:


Counsel:


    Applicant : Mr R A Mazza
    Respondent : Mr R E Cock QC & Mr A S Derrick


Solicitors:

    Applicant : Mazza & Mazza
    Respondent : State Director of Public Prosecutions


Case(s) referred to in judgment(s):

Bropho v R, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 940197; 14 April 1994
Colbung v R [1999] WASCA 138
R v White [2000] WASCA 118
Smith v The Queen [1976] WAR 97

Case(s) also cited:



Ainsworth v D (A Child) (1992) 7 WAR 102
Atholwood v The Queen (1999) 109 A Crim R 465
Fleming v The Queen, unreported; CCA SCt of WA; Library No 970005; 17 January 1997
Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195…

Continue reading Parsons v The Queen

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Parsons v The Queen [2000] WASCA 407
Case
[2000] WASCA 407
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal before the court involved the defendant, Parsons, who was convicted of dangerous driving causing death. The incident involved the overturning of a utility vehicle in an area of road works, resulting in the death of a passenger. The case was heard in the High Court of Australia. Parsons, an 18-year-old, had been driving irresponsibly for a significant distance prior to the fatal accident. He showed remorse for his actions, which was taken into consideration during sentencing. The initial sentence of three years was appealed on the grounds that it was excessive, and the appeal was subsequently allowed.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the original sentence was appropriate given the circumstances of the case. The court had to consider the nature and severity of the offence, the culpability of the offender, and the mitigating factors, such as the defendant's age and expression of remorse. The court also needed to weigh these factors against the principle of deterrence and the need to protect the community from such reckless behaviour. The appeal hinged on the unique facts of the case, including the extensive period of culpable driving before the fatal incident and the defendant's remorse.

In reducing the sentence from three years to two, the court emphasised the importance of tailoring sentences to the specific circumstances of each case. The court acknowledged the gravity of the offence but considered the mitigating factors and the overall context. The court recognised the defendant's remorse as a significant factor that warranted a reduced sentence. The decision reflected a balanced approach that considered both the need for punishment and the potential for rehabilitation. The court's reasoning was grounded in the principle that sentences should reflect the individual circumstances of the offender and the offence, while also serving the broader goals of the criminal justice system.

Orders

Orders of the court

Appeal allowed

Sentence reduced to a term of 2 years

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.