TRADE MARKS ACT 1995
DECISION OF A DELEGATE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS WITH REASONS
Re:International Registration Designating Australia number 2388553 (International Registration number 1750765) (classes 1, 18 & 24) – OVAL - in the name of Pact Earth Ltd
Delegate:
Tracey Berger
Representation:
Applicant: Shehana Wijesena, assisted by Sanya Bhatnagar, both of Bird & Bird
Decision:
2025 ATMO 68
Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) – section 33 proceeding – ground for rejection under s 41(3) considered - trade mark has no inherent adaptation to distinguish – extension of protection refused for goods in classes 18 and 24 – extension of protection granted for class 1 goods
Background
Pact Earth Ltd (‘Holder’) has sought the extension of protection of its International Registration 1750765 to Australia as detailed below:
International Registration Number
1750765
Trade Mark Number
2388553 (‘IRDA’)
Trade Mark
OVAL
Filing Date
27 July 2023[1]
Goods
Class 1: Organic compositions and substances for use in the textile industry; collagen for industrial purposes; proteins for use in the textile industry; collagen for use in the textile industry; chemicals for use in the textile industry; organic materials used as raw ingredients in the manufacture of textiles; organic compositions and substances for use in the manufacture of textiles; plant-based fibres used as a raw ingredient in the manufacture of textiles; collagen used as a raw ingredient in the manufacture of textiles; enzymes for use in the textile industry; reducing agents for the textile industry; collagen used as a raw ingredient in treating, dying, impregnating, waterproofing and brightening textiles; plant-based fibres used as a raw ingredient in in treating, dying, impregnating, waterproofing and brightening textiles; organic compositions and substances for manufacturing, treating, dying, impregnating, waterproofing and brightening textiles; chemicals for treating, dying, impregnating, waterproofing and brightening textiles; chemicals for use in the textile industry; chemicals for use in the manufacture of textiles; adhesives for use in the textile industry; adhesives for use in the manufacture of textiles.
Class 18: Bags; handbags; tote bags; luggage; travelling bags; suitcases; backpacks; purses; wallets; rucksacks; bum bags; holdalls; all of the aforesaid goods being made from a collagen-based biomaterial; imitation leather.
Class 24: Textiles; fabric; textile materials; textile fabrics; cloth; fabrics of organic fibres; household textiles; lining fabrics; waterproof fabrics; apparel fabrics; dressmaking fabrics; curtain fabrics; coated fabrics; knitted fabrics; woven fabrics; non-woven fabrics; furnishing and upholstery fabrics; textile fabrics for use in manufacture; textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of clothing; fabrics for use in the manufacture of hats; fabrics for use in the manufacture of footwear; fabrics for use in the manufacture of bags; fabrics for use in the manufacture of wallets; fabrics for use in the manufacture of purses; non-woven fabrics of natural fibres; fabrics for use in the manufacture of household textile articles.
(‘Holder’s Goods’)
[1] Convention priority claimed: 27 January 2023 based on UK00003872056.
The IRDA was examined under s 33 of the Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth)[2] and a Notice of Provisional Refusal issued raising grounds for rejection under s…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Pact Earth Ltd. and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] ATMO 68
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Hearing Officer was whether the IRDA met the requirements of Division 17A of the relevant regulations and whether any grounds for rejection existed. Specifically, the Hearing Officer had to consider the provisions of regulation 17A.24, which outlines the Registrar's obligations and powers regarding the acceptance or rejection of an IRDA, including the possibility of rejection under section 41 of the Trade Marks Act.
The Hearing Officer found that a ground for rejection existed under section 41 of the Trade Marks Act. Consequently, the Registrar refused the extension of protection for the IRDA in relation to goods in classes 18 and 24. Protection was only extended in relation to class 1 goods. The Hearing Officer also directed that if a notice of appeal was served, protection would not be granted until the appeal was decided or discontinued, and the disposition of the IRDA would be in accordance with any court order.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.