FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Pacific Publications Pty Limited v Next Publishing Pty Limited [2005] FCA 971
COSTS – indemnity costs – solicitor and client costs – exercise of discretion to award costs – factors to be taken into account in making a special order as to costs – whether history of matter disclosed special or unusual features so as to warrant an award of indemnity or solicitor and client costs – whether applicant failed to recognise that its application would inevitably fail – whether applicant’s refusal of offer of compromise was unreasonable or imprudent – whether proceedings were commenced for an improper purpose – whether conduct of proceedings was inappropriate
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43
Federal Court Rules O 62Re Wilcox; Ex parte Venture Industries Pty Ltd (No 2) (1996) 72 FCR 151 referred to
Ruddock v Vardalis (2001) 115 FCR 229 referred to
InterTAN Inc v DSE (Holdings) Pty Limited [2005] FCAFC 54 referred to
Colgate-Palmolive Co v Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225 applied
John S Hayes and Associates Pty Ltd v Kimberley-Clarke Australia Pty Ltd (1994) 52 FCR 201 referred to
Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397 applied
NMFM Property Pty Ltd v Citibank (2001) 109 FCR 77 applied
MGICA (1992) Ltd v Kenny and Good Pty Ltd (No. 2) (1996) 70 FCR 236 applied
Tickell v Trifleska Pty Ltd (1990) 25 NSWLR 353 referred to
Hobartville Stud v Union Insurance Co Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 358 referred to
Williams v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1995] FCA 992 referred to
J-Corp Pty Ltd v Australian Builders Labourers Federated Union of Workers - Western Australia Branch (No 2) (1993) 46 IR 301 appliedPACIFIC PUBLICATIONS PTY LIMITED (ACN 097 410 986) v NEXT PUBLISHING PTY LIMITED (ACN 002 647 645)
NSD 1569 OF 2004TAMBERLIN J
SYDNEY
14 JULY 2005
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 1569 OF 2004
BETWEEN:
PACIFIC PUBLICATIONS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 097 410 896)
APPLICANTAND:
NEXT PUBLISHING PTY LIMITED
(ACN 002 647 645)
RESPONDENTJUDGE:
TAMBERLIN J
DATE OF ORDER:
14 JULY 2005
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
The applicant is to pay the costs of the respondent on a party and party basis.
Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
NSD 1569 OF 2004
BETWEEN:
PACIFIC PUBLICATIONS PTY LIMITED
(ACN 097 410 896)
APPLICANTAND:
NEXT PUBLISHING PTY LIMITED
(ACN 002 647 645)
RESPONDENT
JUDGE:
TAMBERLIN J
DATE:
14 JULY 2005
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 18 May 2005, I published my Reasons for Judgment in this matter and ordered that the application be dismissed with costs.
The respondent, Next Publishing Pty Limited (“Next”), seeks an order that the applicant, Pacific Publications Pty Limited (“Pacific”), pay its costs on an indemnity basis or, alternatively, on a…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Pacific Publications Pty Ltd v Next Publishing Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2005] FCA 971
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the terms of the contract between the two parties, focusing on whether Next Publishing Pty Ltd had violated these terms by engaging in actions that were inconsistent with the agreed obligations. Additionally, the court assessed whether the activities of Next Publishing Pty Ltd constituted copyright infringement, as claimed by Pacific Publications Pty Ltd. The analysis included a review of the specific provisions of the contract and the relevant provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. The court found that while there were breaches of contract, these did not amount to copyright infringement. Consequently, the court dismissed the claim of copyright infringement and ruled in favour of Next Publishing Pty Ltd on the main issues.
In its decision, the court concluded that Next Publishing Pty Ltd had indeed breached the contract but did not infringe on the copyright held by Pacific Publications Pty Ltd. The court ordered Pacific Publications Pty Ltd to pay the costs of the proceeding on a party and party basis. This means that each party is responsible for their own legal costs, without any contribution from the opposing party.
Orders
Orders of the court
The applicant is to pay the costs of the respondent on a party and party basis.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Established by: TAMBERLIN J
Full text does not contain this section.