[P] Pty Ltd and Landis

Case [2010] FMCAfam 1303


FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA

[P] PTY LTD & LANDIS [2010] FMCAfam 1303
FAMILY LAW – Remuneration of court expert’s fees – failure to prove reasonableness of court expert’s fees.
Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001, r.15.11
Conlan as liquidator of Rowena Nominees Pty Ltd (rec and mngr appt) (in liq) v Adams (2008) 65 ACSR 521 (WASCA)
Cook’s Constructions Pty Ltd v Stork Food Systems Aust Pty Ltd [2008] QSC 179
Cook’s Constructions Pty Ltd (ACN 004 782 558) v SFS 007 298 633 Pty Ltd (formerly t/as Stork Food Systems Australasia Pty Ltd) ACN 007 298 633 (2009) 254 ALR 661)
Old v Hodgkinson; Old v McInnes [2009] NSWSC 1130
Re Morris Fletcher Cross’ bill of costs [1997] QdR 228
Re: One.Tel Ltd (In Liq) (2005) 5 ACSR 558
Re. Solfire Pty Ltd (in liq) (No.2) [1998] 2 Qd R 92 (per Shepherdson J)
Re Stockford Ltd; Korda [2004] 140 FCR 424
Applicant: [P] PTY LTD
Respondent: MR LANDIS
File Number: BRC 1480 of 2008
Judgment of: Cassidy FM
Hearing date: 15 September 2010
Date of Last Submission: 4 November 2010
Delivered at: Brisbane
Delivered on: 25 November 2010

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Schulte
Solicitors for the Applicant: Herbert Greer
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Johnstone
Solicitors for the Respondent: Bennett & Philp Solicitors

ORDERS

  1. That all outstanding applications be dismissed. 

  2. That in the event that either party seeks to file a costs application in this matter:

    (a)That any such application for costs be filed and served by no later than 4.00pm on 2 December 2010;

    (b)That the response to the costs application be filed and served by no later than 4.00pm on 9 December 2010; and

    (c)

    That any reply be filed and served by no later than 4.00pm on


    15 December 2010.

  3. That judgment in relation to the costs application be delivered at 2.15pm on 17 December 2010 in the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia at Brisbane. 

NOTATION

(A)It is noted that the court, in the absence of evidence of what is a reasonable fee, adopts the open offer made by Mr Landis at the commencement of the trial in the sum of $22,000.00 as the reasonable fee in this matter. 

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym [P] Pty Ltd & Landis is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

FEDERAL MAGISTRATES
COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AT BRISBANE

BRC 1480 of 2008

[P] PTY LTD

Applicant

And

MR LANDIS

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. In this matter the applicant seeks, in his amended application in a case filed 7 September 2010, that:

    “[2] The husband and the wife cause to be paid to [P] Pty Ltd trading as [P] in relation to an outstanding account dated 17 December 2008 in the sum of $37.541.39 within 7 days of the making of this Order.”

  2. The applicant is also seeking pursuant to that application, interest in relation to the outstanding account and costs on an indemnity…

Continue reading [P] Pty Ltd and Landis

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
[P] Pty Ltd and Landis [2010] FMCAfam 1303
Case
[2010] FMCAfam 1303
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia, the case between [P] Pty Ltd and Landis was brought before the court. The dispute between the parties centred around outstanding applications, which [P] Pty Ltd sought to dismiss. The matter was heard and determined by the Federal Magistrates Court in Brisbane.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the outstanding applications should be dismissed. Additionally, the court was required to set timelines for any future applications for costs, as well as the responses and replies to such applications. The court also needed to determine an appropriate date and time for delivering judgment on the costs application.

The court found that all outstanding applications should be dismissed. In setting out the timelines for any future costs applications, the court mandated that any such application be filed and served by 4.00pm on 2 December 2010. The response to this application was to be filed and served by 4.00pm on 9 December 2010, with any reply to be filed and served by 4.00pm on 15 December 2010. Judgment in relation to the costs application was to be delivered at 2.15pm on 17 December 2010 in the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia at Brisbane.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That all outstanding applications be dismissed.

2.

That in the event that either party seeks to file a costs application in this matter:

(a) That any such application for costs be filed and served by no later than 4.00pm on 2 December 2010;

(b) That the response to the costs application be filed and served by no later than 4.00pm on 9 December 2010; and

(c)

That any reply be filed and served by no later than 4.00pm on

15 December 2010.

3.

That judgment in relation to the costs application be delivered at 2.15pm on 17 December 2010 in the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia at Brisbane.

NOTATION

(A)

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.