| DETERMINATION OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE COMMISSION CONSTITUTED BY AN ARBITRATOR | |
| CITATION: | Ozcan v Macarthur Disability Services Limited [2020] NSWWCCPD 21 |
| APPELLANT: | Nuray Ozcan |
| RESPONDENT: | Macarthur Disability Services Limited |
| INSURER: | AAI limited t/as GIO – Agent for the Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer |
| FILE NUMBER: | A1-691/19 |
| ARBITRATOR: | Mr J Wynyard |
| DATE OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION: | 23 September 2019 |
| DATE OF APPEAL DECISION: | 21 April 2020 |
| SUBJECT MATTER OF DECISION: | Aggregation of impairment – application of common law principles, whether the impairment “results from” the injury – Le Twins Pty Ltd v Luo [2019] NSWWCCPD 52, Murphy v Allity Management Services Pty Ltd [2015] NSWWCCPD 49, Nicol v Macquarie University [2018] NSWSC 530, Johnson v NSW Workers Compensation Commission [2019] NSWSC 347, Government Insurance Office of NSW v Aboushadi [1999] NSWCA 396, considered; State Government Insurance Commission v Oakley (1990) 10 MVR 570; [1990] Aust Torts Reports 81-003, Secretary, New South Wales Department of Education v Johnson [2019] NSWCA 321 considered and applied; application of s 322 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 – Department ofJuvenile Justice v Edmed [2008] NSWWCCPD 6; 7 DDCR 288 applied |
| PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER: | Deputy President Elizabeth Wood |
| HEARING: | On the papers |
| REPRESENTATION: | Appellant: |
| Mr B McManamey, counsel | |
| Brydens Lawyers Pty Ltd | |
| Respondent: | |
| Mr S Grant, counsel | |
| Hicksons Lawyers | |
| ORDERS MADE ON APPEAL: | 1. Paragraph one of the Certificate of Determination dated 23 September 2019 is revoked and the following order is made in its place: (a) The respondent is to pay the applicant $17,902.50 in respect of 12% whole person impairment of the lumbar spine and the thoracic spine (including a 5% uplift) pursuant to s 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. 2. The Certificate of Determination is otherwise confirmed. |
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
Ms Nuray Ozcan (the appellant) suffered a number of injuries in the course of her employment with Macarthur Disability Services Limited (the respondent). The injuries involved the lumbar spine, the thoracic spine, cervical spine, right shoulder and consequential conditions including the upper digestive system. The appellant also suffered a further cervical spine injury on 28 January 2013, which occurred at home and consequently was not the subject of these proceedings.
The appellant brought proceedings in the Commission for lump sum entitlements pursuant to s 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 (the 1987 Act) together with a claim for weekly payments and treatment expenses pursuant to s 60 of the 1987 Act. By consent, the lump sum claim was referred by the Arbitrator, Mr C Burge, to an approved medical specialist (AMS) in the following terms:
“Date of Injury 1: 14 November 2011
Body part/s referred: Lumbar Spine, Thoracic Spine, Cervical Spine, Right Upper Extremity (shoulder), Upper Digestive Tract
Method of assessment: Whole Person Impairment
Date of Injury 2: 3 May 2012
Body part/s referred: Lumbar Spine, Thoracic Spine, Upper Digestive Tract
Method of assessment: Whole Person Impairment
Date of Injury 3: 26 September 2012
Body part/s referred: Lumbar…
Continue reading Ozcan v Macarthur Disability Services Limited
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Ozcan v Macarthur Disability Services Limited [2020] NSWWCCPD 21
- Case
- [2020] NSWWCCPD 21
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the principles established in various cases, including Le Twins Pty Ltd v Luo, Murphy v Allity Management Services Pty Ltd, Nicol v Macquarie University, Johnson v NSW Workers Compensation Commission, Government Insurance Office of NSW v Aboushadi, State Government Insurance Commission v Oakley, and Secretary, New South Wales Department of Education v Johnson. These cases provided guidance on the aggregation of impairments and the circumstances under which an impairment is considered to "result from" an injury. The court also considered statutory provisions, particularly section 322 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998, as applied in Department of Juvenile Justice v Edmed.
The tribunal found that the applicant's impairment, as assessed, was a result of the injury and was correctly aggregated under the common law principles. The tribunal also found that the statutory provisions were properly applied, and the assessment of the impairment was in accordance with the legislative framework. Consequently, the tribunal revoked part of the previous determination and ordered the respondent to pay the applicant additional compensation for the assessed impairment. The remainder of the Certificate of Determination was confirmed.
The final orders included the revocation of a portion of the Certificate of Determination dated 23 September 2019 and the substitution of a new order for the payment of $17,902.50 to the applicant. The tribunal confirmed the rest of the Certificate of Determination.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Paragraph one of the Certificate of Determination dated 23 September 2019 is revoked and the following order is made in its place:
(a) The respondent is to pay the applicant $17,902.50 in respect of 12% whole person impairment of the lumbar spine and the thoracic spine (including a 5% uplift) pursuant to s 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987.
2. The Certificate of Determination is otherwise confirmed.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.