| WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION | ||||||
| DETERMINATION OF APPEAL AGAINST A DECISION OF THE COMMISSION CONSTITUTED BY AN ARBITRATOR | ||||||
| CITATION: | Ozblue Constructions Pty Ltd v Lang [2009] NSWWCCPD 3 | |||||
| APPELLANT: | Ozblue Constructions Pty Ltd | |||||
| RESPONDENT: | Jayde Lang | |||||
| INSURER: | CGU Workers Comp (NSW) Limited | |||||
| FILE NUMBER: | A1-5947/08 | |||||
| DATE OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION: | 2 October 2008 | |||||
| DATE OF APPEAL DECISION: | 12 January 2009 | |||||
| SUBJECT MATTER OF DECISION: | Interlocutory orders; section 352(8) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 | |||||
| PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER: | Acting President Bill Roche | |||||
| HEARING: | On the papers | |||||
| REPRESENTATION: | Appellant: | Sparke Helmore | ||||
| Respondent: | Brazel Moore Lawyers | |||||
| ORDERS MADE ON APPEAL: | Leave to appeal the Arbitrator’s determination of 2 October 2008 is refused. | |||||
| The appellant employer is to pay the respondent worker’s costs of the appeal. | ||||||
INTRODUCTION
This appeal concerns the nature of an interlocutory order and whether an order made by an arbitrator remitting a matter to the Registrar for referral to an Approved Medical Specialist (‘AMS’) for assessment of the worker’s whole person impairment resulting from his undisputed injuries was such an order.
BACKGROUND
On 26 July 2006, Mr Lang sustained multiple injuries when he fell onto concrete from a height of about 2.5 metres whilst working for Ozblue Constructions Pty Ltd (‘Ozblue’). Oz accepted liability for Mr Lang’s claim for weekly compensation and it is not disputed that he injured his cervical spine (neck), thoracic spine, lumbar spine, left elbow, and left leg in the fall.
Mr Lang was taken to hospital by ambulance where his left leg was x-rayed and he was discharged home on the same day. His pain continued and he saw his local doctor a few days later. In September 2007, x-rays were taken of his jaw, facial bones, cervical spine, thoracic spine, lumbar spine, pelvis, left elbow and left foot. The x-rays revealed no fractures, but degenerative changes were noted in his thoracic spine and lumbar spine.
On 29 January 2007, Professor Ghabrial, orthopaedic and spinal surgeon, examined Mr Lang and recorded that he complained of tenderness in his neck, left elbow, back (thoracic spine and lumbar spine) and left leg. He diagnosed his injuries to be:
“1. Severe soft tissue injury to the neck.
2. Soft tissue injuries to his back.
3. Post traumatic medical epicondylitis.
4.Haematoma of the left thigh with the subsequent development of lateral cutaneous nerve [damage] of the thigh [causing] dysaesthesia and post traumatic chronic trochanteric bursitis.”
In accordance with the WorkCover Guides for the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (‘the WorkCover Guides’) and the American Medical Association’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, fifth edition (‘AMA5’), Professor Ghabrial assessed Mr Lang to have an 18% whole person impairment made up as follows:
(a)5% whole person impairment regarding the neck, according to DRE Cervical Category II;
(b)7% whole person impairment regarding the lumbar spine, according to DRE Lumbar Category II;
(c)0% whole person impairment regarding the thoracic spine;
(d)3% whole person impairment regarding left leg trochanteric bursitis, according to Table 17-33;
(e)3% whole person impairment regarding left leg dysaesthesia of the…
Continue reading Ozblue Constructions Pty Ltd v Lang
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Ozblue Constructions Pty Ltd v Lang [2009] NSWWCCPD 3
- Case
- [2009] NSWWCCPD 3
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the relevant provisions of the Act and noted that section 352(8) specifically limits the right to appeal to decisions made by a workers' compensation magistrate. The court determined that an arbitrator does not hold the same status as a magistrate for the purposes of the right to appeal. Therefore, the court concluded that the arbitrator’s decision was final and could not be appealed by Ozblue Constructions Pty Ltd. As a result, the court refused the leave to appeal the arbitrator’s determination.
Orders
Orders of the court
Leave to appeal the Arbitrator’s determination of 2 October 2008 is refused.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.