Nucifora v AAI Limited

Case [2013] QSC 338


SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

Nucifora & Another v AAI Limited [2013] QSC 338

PARTIES:

Michael John NUCIFORA

First Plaintiff

Arianne Kerry NUCIFORA

Second Plaintiff

And

AAI LIMITED

(ABN 48 005 297 807)

Defendant

FILE NO/S:

Rockhampton S 288 of 2013

DIVISION:

Trial Division

PROCEEDING:

Trial

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court at Rockhampton

DELIVERED ON:

13 December 2013

DELIVERED AT:

Rockhampton

HEARING DATE:

3, 4 December 2013.

JUDGE:

McMeekin J

ORDER:

Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $329,161.78

CATCHWORDS:

DAMAGES – MEASURE AND REMOTENESS OF DAMAGES IN ACTION FOR TORT – MEASURE OF DAMAGES – LOSS OF EARNING CAPACITY – where plaintiff injured in motor vehicle accident – where liability admitted – where plaintiff suffers from back, neck and shoulder pain and anxiety as a result of accident – whether the plaintiff has suffered a loss of earning capacity.

DAMAGES – MEASURE AND REMOTENESS OF DAMAGES IN ACTIONS FOR TORT - MEASURE OF DAMAGES – PERSONAL INJURIES – where claim for paid services in the future.

Civil Liability Act (Qld) 2003, s55, 59

Civil Liability Regulation 2003 (Qld), Sch 4.

Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd v McCarthy [2012] QCA 312, followed

Ballesteros v Chidlow & Anor [2006] QCA 323, cited

Carroll v Coomber & Anor [2006] QDC 146, cited

Clement v Backo [2007] 2 Qd R 99, cited

CSR Ltd v Eddy (2005) 226 CLR 1, cited

Graham v Baker (1961) 106 CLR 340, cited

Kawecki v Tobin & Suncorp Metway Ltd [2007] QDC 321, cited

Malec v JC Hutton Pty Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 638, cited

Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1995) 182 CLR 1, cited

Paul v Rendell (1981) 55 ALJR 371, cited

Reardon-Smith v Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd [2007] QCA 211, cited

COUNSEL:

Mr B Whitten for the Plaintiff

Mr GF Crow QC for  the Defendant

SOLICITORS:

Rees R & Sydney Jones for the Plaintiff

Grant and Simpson Lawyers for the Defendant

  1. MCMEEKIN J: The plaintiffs, Mr and Mrs Nucifora, suffered personal injury in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 6 July 2011. They claimed damages. Liability was admitted. The second plaintiff’s claim was settled. The first plaintiff’s claim was not. I am required to assess damages.

  1. Mr Nucifora was born on 1 November 1972 and so is presently aged 41 years and was 39 years of age when injured.

  1. In the subject accident Mr Nucifora suffered the following injuries:

    (i)         compression fracture of the thoracic spine of T10;

    (ii)        fractured sternum;

    (iii)       fractured ribs eight and nine;

    (iv)       soft tissue damage to the right-hand;

    (v)        soft tissue damage to the cervical spine;

    (vi)       soft tissue injury to the coccyx;

  2. It is agreed that as a result of the injuries Mr Nucifora has an adjustment disorder with anxiety.

  1. The parties have reached agreement on a number of matters:

    (i)        the assessment of damages is governed by the provisions of the Civil Liability Act 2003 and regulations made pursuant to that Act;

    (ii)       the appropriate ISV…

Continue reading Nucifora v AAI Limited

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Nucifora & Another v AAI Limited [2013] QSC 338
Case
[2013] QSC 338
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Nucifora v AAI Limited involved a motor vehicle accident where the plaintiff, Nucifora, suffered injuries resulting in back, neck, and shoulder pain, as well as anxiety. Liability for the accident was admitted by the defendant, AAI Limited, leaving the primary issue of damages to be determined. The court was tasked with assessing whether Nucifora had indeed suffered a loss of earning capacity due to the injuries sustained.

The central legal issue before the court was the quantification of damages, specifically whether Nucifora's injuries resulted in a measurable loss of earning capacity. This required the court to consider both the nature of the injuries and their impact on Nucifora's ability to work in the future. The court also had to determine if the plaintiff's claims for paid services in the future were valid and quantifiable.

The court found that Nucifora had suffered a loss of earning capacity due to the injuries, which significantly impacted his ability to work in the future. The court detailed the extent of these injuries and their implications for Nucifora's career, concluding that the loss of earning capacity was both real and quantifiable. After careful consideration of the evidence presented, the court awarded damages in the sum of $329,161.78 to Nucifora.

Orders

Orders of the court

Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $329,161.78

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.