Norkin v University of New England

Case [2023] NSWCA 26


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Norkin v University of New England [2023] NSWCA 26
Hearing dates: On the papers
Date of orders: 28 February 2023
Decision date: 28 February 2023
Before: Leeming JA; Basten AJA
Decision:

1. List the summons seeking leave to appeal for a concurrent hearing of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal itself, confined to the ground “Whether the conduct of the University in undertaking a pre-assessment of the applicant’s brother’s visa eligibility within the Commonwealth “Simplified Student Visa Framework” complied with the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW)”, on a date to be fixed by the Registrar.

2. Direct the Registrar to appoint counsel to appear as amicus curiae.

Catchwords:

APPEALS – leave to appeal – university collection of personal information for purpose of pre-visa assessment – whether compliance with Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW) – other proposed grounds of appeal not warranting grant of leave – concurrent hearing of question whether compliance with Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act – other grounds dismissed

Legislation Cited:

Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW), ss 8, 10, 17, 18

Migration Act 1958 (Cth)

University of New England Act 1993 (NSW), s 6

Cases Cited:

DQV v University of New England [2021] NSWCATAP 208

Norkin v University of New England [2022] NSWSC 819

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Anton Norkin (Applicant)
University of New England (First Respondent)
Civil and Administrative Tribunal of New South Wales (Second Respondent – submitting appearance)
Representation:

Applicant (self-represented)
C Tipene (solicitor) (First Respondent)

Solicitors:
Sparke Helmore Lawyers (First Respondent)
File Number(s): 2022/212427
Publication restriction: N/A
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Common Law
Citation:

[2022] NSWSC 819

Date of Decision:
24 June 2022
Before:
Davies J
File Number(s):
2021/224913

Judgment

  1. THE COURT: The applicant, Anton Norkin, is the brother and sponsor of a person who sought to enrol at the University of New England as an overseas student, who seeks leave to appeal from a decision of the Supreme Court Norkin v University of New England [2022] NSWSC 819 (Davies J) dismissing his appeal from NCAT: DQV v University of New England [2021] NSWCATAP 208. Both sides have supplied written submissions in support of and opposing the grant of leave, and consented to the grant of leave being dealt with in the absence of the public and without oral hearing. The factual background summarised below is taken from the reasons given by Davies J and the Appeal Panel, and may well be uncontroversial.

  2. Under the University’s program for admission of overseas students, the applicant’s brother was required to supply personal information to allow the University to undertake a pre-assessment of his visa eligibility. The process involved the University being part of the Commonwealth “Simplified Student Visa Framework” (SSVF). Although the University apparently holds no decision-making authority under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) and Migration Regulations, Davies J described the object…

Continue reading Norkin v University of New England

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Norkin v University of New England [2023] NSWCA 26
Case
[2023] NSWCA 26
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Norkin, sought leave to appeal a decision concerning the University of New England's collection of personal information. The dispute centred on whether the University's actions, specifically in undertaking a pre-assessment of the applicant's brother's visa eligibility under the Commonwealth's Simplified Student Visa Framework, complied with the *Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998* (NSW). The matter came before Leeming JA and Basten AJA of the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the University's conduct in collecting and processing the applicant's brother's personal information for the purpose of a pre-visa assessment was consistent with the requirements of the *Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998* (NSW). Other proposed grounds of appeal were considered by the Court, but the focus of the concurrent hearing was to be confined to this specific privacy issue.

The Court ordered that the summons seeking leave to appeal be listed for a concurrent hearing of the application for leave and the appeal itself. This hearing was to be strictly confined to the question of whether the University's pre-assessment of the applicant's brother's visa eligibility complied with the *Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998* (NSW). Furthermore, the Registrar was directed to appoint counsel to appear as *amicus curiae* to assist the Court.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. List the summons seeking leave to appeal for a concurrent hearing of the application for leave to appeal and the appeal itself, confined to the ground “Whether the conduct of the University in undertaking a pre-assessment of the applicant’s brother’s visa eligibility within the Commonwealth “Simplified Student Visa Framework” complied with the Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998 (NSW)”, on a date to be fixed by the Registrar.

2. Direct the Registrar to appoint counsel to appear as amicus curiae.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.