CHARLES PHILIPPE LOUIS NILANT as Trustee of the property of RAMON THEODORE OSBORNE, a Bankrupt -v- R L & K W NOMINEES PTY LTD & ANOR [2007] WASC 105
| SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA | Citation No: | [2007] WASC 105 | |
| Case No: | COR:198/2005 | 22, 23 JUNE & 18 DECEMBER 2006 | |
| Coram: | HASLUCK J | 10/05/07 | |
| 51 | Judgment Part: | 1 of 1 | |
| Result: | Judgment for the plaintiff | ||
| B | |||
| PDF Version |
| Parties: | CHARLES PHILIPPE LOUIS NILANT as Trustee of the property of RAMON THEODORE OSBORNE, a Bankrupt R L & K W NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 008 892 493) BERYL NORMA OSBORNE |
Catchwords: | Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) Application for winding up Just and equitable ground Allegations of unfair and oppressive conduct Application by principal shareholder's trustee in bankruptcy Family company holding valuable properties Findings of mismanagement Application for winding up order allowed |
Legislation: | Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 81 Companies (WA) Code Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 232(e), s 233, s 461(1)(f), s 461(1)(k), s 467 |
Case References: | Coombs v Dynasty Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACLC 915 Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd [1998] NSWSC 413 Host-Plus Pty Ltd v Australian Hotels Association [2003] VSC 145 Jenkins v Enterprise Gold Mines NL (1992) 6 ACSR 539 Loch v John Blackwood Ltd [1924] AC 783 Malos v Malos (2003) 44 ACSR 511 Morgan v 45 Flers Avenue Pty Ltd (1986) 10 ACLR 692 Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Buffier [2005] NSWSC 839 Re Dalkeith Investments Pty Ltd (1984) 3 ACLC 74 Re Five Minute Car Wash Service Ltd [1966] 1 WLR 745 Re Jermyn Street Turkish Baths Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 1042 Re Wondoflex Textiles Pty Ltd [1951] VLR 458 Stapp v Surge Holdings Pty Ltd (1999) 17 ACLC 896 Thomas v HW Thomas Ltd [1984] 1 NZLR 686 Wayde v New South Wales Rugby League Ltd (Western Suburbs case) (1985) 3 ACLC 799 |
JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
- IN CHAMBERS
and
R L & K W NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 008 892 493)
- Plaintiff
AND
R L & K W NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 008 892 493)
First Defendant
BERYL NORMA OSBORNE
Second Defendant
(Page 2)
Catchwords:
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Application for winding up - Just and equitable ground - Allegations of unfair and oppressive conduct - Application by principal shareholder's trustee in bankruptcy - Family company holding valuable properties - Findings of mismanagement - Application for winding up order allowed
Legislation:
Bankruptcy Act 1966
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Nilant v RL & KW Nominees Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2007] WASC 105
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the winding up of the company was just and equitable, and whether the actions of the majority shareholders amounted to mismanagement. The court had to consider the relevant provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the case law on the topic.
The court found that the management of the company was indeed oppressive and that the majority shareholders had engaged in mismanagement. The court held that the company should be wound up as it was just and equitable to do so. The court also found that the actions of the majority shareholders amounted to mismanagement and that the company should be wound up as a result. The court held that the applicant was entitled to the relief sought.
The court made a declaration that the company be wound up. The court also ordered that the company's assets be sold and the proceeds distributed to the creditors of the company. The court further ordered that the costs of the application be paid by the respondent company.
Orders
Orders of the court
Judgment for the plaintiff
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.