Nilant v RL & KW Nominees Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 86 min read

CHARLES PHILIPPE LOUIS NILANT as Trustee of the property of RAMON THEODORE OSBORNE, a Bankrupt -v- R L & K W NOMINEES PTY LTD & ANOR [2007] WASC 105



SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIACitation No:[2007] WASC 105
Case No:COR:198/200522, 23 JUNE & 18 DECEMBER 2006
Coram:HASLUCK J10/05/07
51Judgment Part:1 of 1
Result: Judgment for the plaintiff
B
PDF Version
Parties:CHARLES PHILIPPE LOUIS NILANT as Trustee of the property of RAMON THEODORE OSBORNE, a Bankrupt
R L & K W NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 008 892 493)
BERYL NORMA OSBORNE

Catchwords:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Application for winding up
Just and equitable ground
Allegations of unfair and oppressive conduct
Application by principal shareholder's trustee in bankruptcy
Family company holding valuable properties
Findings of mismanagement
Application for winding up order allowed

Legislation:

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 81
Companies (WA) Code
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 232(e), s 233, s 461(1)(f), s 461(1)(k), s 467

Case References:

Coombs v Dynasty Pty Ltd (1994) 12 ACLC 915
Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd [1998] NSWSC 413
Host-Plus Pty Ltd v Australian Hotels Association [2003] VSC 145
Jenkins v Enterprise Gold Mines NL (1992) 6 ACSR 539
Loch v John Blackwood Ltd [1924] AC 783
Malos v Malos (2003) 44 ACSR 511
Morgan v 45 Flers Avenue Pty Ltd (1986) 10 ACLR 692
Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Buffier [2005] NSWSC 839
Re Dalkeith Investments Pty Ltd (1984) 3 ACLC 74
Re Five Minute Car Wash Service Ltd [1966] 1 WLR 745
Re Jermyn Street Turkish Baths Ltd [1971] 1 WLR 1042
Re Wondoflex Textiles Pty Ltd [1951] VLR 458
Stapp v Surge Holdings Pty Ltd (1999) 17 ACLC 896
Thomas v HW Thomas Ltd [1984] 1 NZLR 686
Wayde v New South Wales Rugby League Ltd (Western Suburbs case) (1985) 3 ACLC 799


JURISDICTION : SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
    IN CHAMBERS
CITATION : CHARLES PHILIPPE LOUIS NILANT as Trustee of the property of RAMON THEODORE OSBORNE, a Bankrupt -v- R L & K W NOMINEES PTY LTD & ANOR [2007] WASC 105 CORAM : HASLUCK J HEARD : 22, 23 JUNE & 18 DECEMBER 2006 DELIVERED : 10 MAY 2007 FILE NO/S : COR 198 of 2005 MATTER : Section 233 and Section 461 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

    and

    R L & K W NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 008 892 493)
BETWEEN : CHARLES PHILIPPE LOUIS NILANT as Trustee of the property of RAMON THEODORE OSBORNE, a Bankrupt
    Plaintiff

    AND

    R L & K W NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 008 892 493)
    First Defendant

    BERYL NORMA OSBORNE
    Second Defendant

(Page 2)



Catchwords:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) - Application for winding up - Just and equitable ground - Allegations of unfair and oppressive conduct - Application by principal shareholder's trustee in bankruptcy - Family company holding valuable properties - Findings of mismanagement - Application for winding up order allowed

Legislation:

Bankruptcy Act 1966

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Nilant v RL & KW Nominees Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2007] WASC 105
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nilant, as trustee in bankruptcy of the bankrupt Nilant, brought an application for the winding up of RL & KW Nominees Pty Ltd. The respondent company was a family business holding valuable properties. Nilant alleged that the company had been managed unfairly and oppressively, and that the actions of the majority shareholders amounted to mismanagement. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The court was required to determine whether the winding up of the company was just and equitable, and whether the actions of the majority shareholders amounted to mismanagement. The court had to consider the relevant provisions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the case law on the topic.

The court found that the management of the company was indeed oppressive and that the majority shareholders had engaged in mismanagement. The court held that the company should be wound up as it was just and equitable to do so. The court also found that the actions of the majority shareholders amounted to mismanagement and that the company should be wound up as a result. The court held that the applicant was entitled to the relief sought.

The court made a declaration that the company be wound up. The court also ordered that the company's assets be sold and the proceeds distributed to the creditors of the company. The court further ordered that the costs of the application be paid by the respondent company.

Orders

Orders of the court

Judgment for the plaintiff

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.