Nelson v Thompson

Case [2021] FCA 1055


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Nelson v Thompson [2021] FCA 1055  

File number(s): QUD 237 of 2021
Judgment of: DOWNES J
Date of judgment: 1 September 2021
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – claim brought against former solicitor – solicitor became bankrupt – whether leave should be granted to take a step in a proceeding pursuant to s 58(3) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – application allowed.
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 5, 58(3), 82
Cases cited:

7Steel Building Solutions Pty Ltd v Wright [2011] FCA 328

Allanson v Midland Credit Ltd (1977) 30 FLR 108; [1977] FCA 66

Coventry v Charter Pacific Corporation Ltd (2005) 227 CLR 234; [2005] HCA 67

GFIN Pty Limited v Gooden, in the matter of GFIN Pty Limited (No 2) [2020] FCA 1440

Lovell v Penkin (A Bankrupt) and Another (2008) 101 ALD 335; [2008] FCA 637

Nelson v Thompson [2020] WASC 261

The Owners – Strata Plan 80647 v WFI Insurance Limited and another (2015) 299 FLR 77; [2015] NSWSC 1161

Division: General Division
Registry: Queensland
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Number of paragraphs: 25
Date of hearing: The application was determined on the papers
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr DJ Garnsworthy

ORDERS

QUD 237 of 2021
BETWEEN:

PETER STANLEY NELSON

Applicant

AND:

JARROD ROBERT THOMPSON

First Respondent

OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY

Second Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

DOWNES J

DATE OF ORDER:

1 SEPTEMBER 2021

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.To the extent such leave is necessary by reason of s 58(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), the applicant, Peter Nelson, has leave to continue and take fresh steps in proceedings instituted by him in the Supreme Court of Western Australia against Jarrod Thompson in action CIV 2404 of 2015 (the proceedings). 

2.The granting of leave in the preceding paragraph is conditional upon the applicant providing a written undertaking to this Court within 14 days that:

(a)he will not seek final relief in the proceedings without having given seven days’ notice to the office of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy;

(b)he will not oppose any application by the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy to be joined or heard in the proceedings.

3.Such leave does not extend to the taking of any step to enforce any judgment obtained in the proceedings without leave first being obtained from this Court. 

4.There be no order as to costs.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

DOWNES J:

INTRODUCTION

  1. The applicant, Mr Peter Nelson, is the plaintiff in proceedings in the Supreme Court of Western Australia, being matter number CIV 2404 of 2015 (the proceedings).

  2. The proceedings were commenced on 2 September 2015. 

  3. The defendant to the proceedings is Mr Jarrod Thompson who was the former solicitor of the applicant (Mr Thompson).

  4. The claim brought against Mr Thompson stems from the applicant and his former business partner engaging Mr Thompson to prepare…

Continue reading Nelson v Thompson

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Nelson v Thompson [2021] FCA 1055
Case
[2021] FCA 1055
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, Peter Nelson sought leave to continue proceedings against Jarrod Thompson, who had previously been his solicitor but had since become bankrupt. Nelson had instituted proceedings against Thompson in the Supreme Court of Western Australia in 2015, and sought leave to continue those proceedings under section 58(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth). The court was required to determine whether leave should be granted, and if so, under what conditions.

The court identified the key legal issue as whether leave should be granted to Nelson to continue and take fresh steps in the proceedings, and if so, under what conditions. The court noted that the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) provided that a bankrupt’s estate vests in the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, and that any proceedings brought by or against a bankrupt are stayed unless leave is granted. The court considered the relevant statutory provisions, including section 58(3), which provides that the court may grant leave to take steps in a proceeding, and the factors it must consider in doing so. The court also considered relevant case law.

The court found that leave should be granted to Nelson to continue and take fresh steps in the proceedings, subject to certain conditions. The court noted that Nelson had a legitimate claim against Thompson, and that there were no other creditors who would be prejudiced by the continuation of the proceedings. The court also noted that the conditions imposed on the grant of leave, including the requirement that Nelson provide a written undertaking to the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, were sufficient to protect the interests of other creditors. The court therefore granted leave to Nelson to continue and take fresh steps in the proceedings, subject to the conditions set out in the orders.

The court made orders granting leave to Nelson to continue and take fresh steps in the proceedings, subject to certain conditions. The orders also provided that leave did not extend to the taking of any step to enforce any judgment obtained in the proceedings without leave first being obtained from the court. The court made no order as to costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. To the extent such leave is necessary by reason of s 58(3) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), the applicant, Peter Nelson, has leave to continue and take fresh steps in proceedings instituted by him in the Supreme Court of Western Australia against Jarrod Thompson in action CIV 2404 of 2015 (the proceedings).

2. The granting of leave in the preceding paragraph is conditional upon the applicant providing a written undertaking to this Court within 14 days that:

(a) he will not seek final relief in the proceedings without having given seven days’ notice to the office of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy;

(b) he will not oppose any application by the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy to be joined or heard in the proceedings.

3. Such leave does not extend to the taking of any step to enforce any judgment obtained in the proceedings without leave first being obtained from this Court.

4. There be no order as to costs.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.