FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| NEIL v REWARD PROPERTY GROUP PTY LTD | [2008] FMCA 1583 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Application to set aside bankruptcy notice. |
| PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Venue – application to change – mandatory matters for consideration – other relevant matters for consideration. |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.40(1)(g), 41(1)(a)(ii), 121 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s.459G Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth), ss.18, 39, 45, 52 Federal Magistrates Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2006 (Cth), r.3.02 Federal Magistrates Court Rules 2001 (Cth), rr.8.01, 8.02,14.02 |
| Applicant: | PETER CHRISTIAN NEIL |
| Respondent: | REWARD PROPERTY GROUP PTY LTD |
| File Number: | PEG 153 of 2008 |
| Judgment of: | Lucev FM |
| Hearing date: | 24 November 2008 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 24 November 2008 |
| Delivered at: | Perth |
| Delivered on: | 5 December 2008 |
REPRESENTATION
| Applicant: | In person |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr S Senathirajah |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Hall and Wilcox |
ORDERS
That proceeding number PEG 153 of 2008 be transferred to the Melbourne District Registry of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia.
That the proceedings be adjourned to a further directions hearing at a time and place to be advised before the Federal Magistrate to whom the matter is docketed in the Melbourne Registry.
That time for compliance with the Bankruptcy Notice VN 740 of 2008 be extended until further order of the Court.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PERTH |
PEG 153 of 2008
| PETER CHRISTIAN NEIL |
Applicant
And
| REWARD PROPERTY GROUP PTY LTD |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
The substantive proceedings involve an application made on 3 October 2008 seeking two final orders: first, to set aside a bankruptcy notice, No. VN 740/2008, served on the applicant, Mr Neil on 26 September 2008, and secondly, costs. The bankruptcy notice, which accompanies the application, claims that Mr Neil owes the respondent, Reward Property Group Pty Ltd,[1] $5,518.20, being an amount arising from costs orders made by the Supreme Court of Victoria.
[1] “Reward Property”.
Mr Neil also seeks, by…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Neil v Reward Property Group Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2008] FMCA 1583
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered the appropriate venue for the proceedings and determined that a transfer to the Melbourne District Registry was necessary for efficient case management. The court also noted the need for a further directions hearing to address the issues raised by the parties. In addition, the court recognised the necessity of extending the time for compliance with the bankruptcy notice to ensure that the parties had adequate opportunity to prepare their respective cases.
In light of these considerations, the court ordered that the proceeding be transferred to the Melbourne District Registry of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia. Furthermore, the court set a further directions hearing to be held at a time and place to be advised. Lastly, the court extended the time for compliance with the bankruptcy notice until further order of the court. These orders aimed to facilitate the resolution of the dispute and ensure that the parties had a fair opportunity to present their cases.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That proceeding number PEG 153 of 2008 be transferred to the Melbourne District Registry of the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia.
2.
That the proceedings be adjourned to a further directions hearing at a time and place to be advised before the Federal Magistrate to whom the matter is docketed in the Melbourne Registry.
3.
That time for compliance with the Bankruptcy Notice VN 740 of 2008 be extended until further order of the Court.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.