Nash v Queensland Building Services Authority

Case [2009] QCAT 29


Citation:

Nash v Queensland Building Services Authority [2009] QCAT 29

Parties:

David William Nash
-v-
Queensland Building Services Authority

Application No:        QR248-09

Matter Type:            Occupational Regulation

Delivered on:           11th December 2009

Delivered at:            Brisbane

Hearing date:           On the papers

Decision of:             Dr Bridget Cullen Mandikos

Catchwords: Leave granted from procedural requirements to use QCAT forms, section 61(1)(c) of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009; Withdrawal of Application by consent, section 46 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009.

Number of
Paragraphs:             8

ORDERS MADE:   

Leave is granted, dispensing with the requirement that the parties utilise the appropriate form seeking withdrawal by consent.

Leave is granted, permitting the Applicant, Mr David William Nash, to withdraw his Application for Review brought against the Respondent, the Queensland Building Services Authority.

The parties to bear their own costs in this matter.

Reasons for Decision

  1. On 2nd October 2009, the Applicant, David William Nash, filed an application for review with the then Commercial and Consumer Tribunal of a decision by the Queensland Building Services Authority (“QBSA”), dated 7th September 2009, refusing the Applicant’s application to be categorised as a permitted individual for a relevant event.  The affidavit of service was filed with the then Commercial and Consumer Tribunal on 5th October 2009. 

  1. On 13th October 2009, the parties were directed by the then Commercial and Consumer Tribunal to comply with various timeframes for the lodging of relevant materials.

  1. The Commercial and Consumer Tribunal has amalgamated into the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (“QCAT”). QCAT now hears and decides all matters previously dealt with by the Commercial and Consumer Tribunal: section 256 Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009.

  1. On 7th December 2009, the parties filed a jointly signed “Form 6 – Consent Notice” with QCAT, using the form provided by the then Commercial and Consumer Tribunal, seeking orders permitting the withdrawal of the Applicant’s Review Application; and (2) requesting that the parties bear their own costs of and incidental to the application.

  1. Section 61(1)(c) of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 provides that QCAT may, by order, waive non-compliance with procedural requirements under the QCAT Act.

  1. In consideration of the fact that the parties had obtained the form used prior to the commencement of QCAT, and in consideration of the parties’ filing of the old form shortly after the commencement of QCAT, I order that leave be granted, dispensing with the requirement that the parties utilise the appropriate form for withdrawal by consent (in this case, QCAT “Application for decision/order by consent”).

  1. Section 46 of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 provides that with the leave of the Tribunal, withdrawal of an application is permitted.  I grant this leave, and permit the Applicant to withdraw his Application for Review.

  1. The parties to bear their own costs of and incidental to the Application for Review.

Details
AGLC
Nash v Queensland Building Services Authority [2009] QCAT 29
Case
[2009] QCAT 29
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

David William Nash applied to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (QCAT) for leave to dispense with certain procedural requirements in relation to his application for review against the Queensland Building Services Authority. The application involved seeking withdrawal of the application by consent and the use of QCAT forms. The tribunal was required to decide whether to grant the leave under section 61(1)(c) of the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009.

The primary legal issue before the tribunal was whether the applicant's circumstances justified granting leave to dispense with the procedural requirements under the Act. The tribunal considered whether there were any compelling reasons or exceptional circumstances warranting the departure from the usual procedures. The tribunal also had to determine whether the application for withdrawal by consent was appropriate and whether it would serve the interests of justice.

The tribunal granted the leave to dispense with the requirement that the parties utilise the appropriate form seeking withdrawal by consent. It also granted leave permitting the applicant to withdraw his application for review by consent. The tribunal found that the applicant's circumstances justified the departure from the usual procedures and that the withdrawal of the application by consent was appropriate. The tribunal noted that the parties had reached an agreement, which was in the interests of justice and efficiency. The tribunal ordered that the parties bear their own costs in the matter.

Orders

Orders of the court

Leave is granted, dispensing with the requirement that the parties utilise the appropriate form seeking withdrawal by consent.

Leave is granted, permitting the Applicant, Mr David William Nash, to withdraw his Application for Review brought against the Respondent, the Queensland Building Services Authority.

The parties to bear their own costs in this matter.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.