Narkis and Narkis (No 3)

Link copied
Case Copied 18 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

NARKIS & NARKIS (NO 3) [2016] FamCA 1048
FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Interlocutory applications  by both parties pending final hearing in February 2017 including for “Letters Rogatory”, discovery, litigation funding, injunctive relief, requirements for personal attendance of husband who lives overseas, payment of health insurance for the wife and the child and similar matters – Where the judge suggests that the evidence provided by the self-represented applicant is insufficient to make the orders sought and the wife then seeks an adjournment – Where some matters are able to be determined and orders made – Where the husband’s application for keys and access to a property is necessary to enable the February trial to proceed – Reasons given ex tempore.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)
APPLICANT: Ms Narkis
RESPONDENT: Mr Narkis
FILE NUMBER: MLC 210 of 2014
DATE DELIVERED: 2 December 2016
PLACE DELIVERED: Melbourne
PLACE HEARD: Melbourne
JUDGMENT OF: Cronin J
HEARING DATE: 2 December 2016

REPRESENTATION

THE APPLICANT: In person
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Ms Swart
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Cantwell Family Lawyer

Orders

  1. That the wife’s application filed 25 November 2016 (save paragraph 11, 13 and 14) is adjourned to 10.00am on 2 February 2017 for the determination of all outstanding interlocutory issues.

  2. That save for the orders sought by the husband as set out below and granted by the court, the balance of the husband’s application filed 1 December 2016 is also adjourned to 10.00am on 2 February 2017.

  3. That the objections of the wife to the release of information provided under subpoenae by Westpac Bank and the Department of Immigration and Border Control are both dismissed and any information provided thereunder is released to all parties for inspection and copying.

  4. That by 4.00pm on Wednesday 7 December 2016 the wife provide to valuers RR the access key and the alarm code to the real property at O Street, Suburb P together with the names of the engineers involved in the repair of, alteration to or protection of the said property and upon the valuation being completed by RR the key be immediately returned to the wife.

  5. That by 4.00pm on Wednesday 7 December 2016 the wife provide to the solicitors for the husband by email the residential address of the child E.

  6. That the conciliation conference listed for 7 December 2016 is vacated.

  7. That the application by the husband (paragraph 2) for the sale of the property at M Street, Suburb N is dismissed.

  8. That by 4.00pm on 7 December 2016 the wife provide by email to the solicitors for the husband a copy of the inventory of assets and liabilities of the Estate of Mr SS along with a copy of his will and copies of all correspondence to and from the wife and the legal representatives acting on behalf of the Estate of the Late said Mr SS.

  9. Reserve the husband’s costs to the return date.

IT IS CERTIFIED:

  1. That pursuant to Order 19.50 of the

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Narkis and Narkis (No 3) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2016] FamCA 1048
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Narkis and Narkis (No 3)*, the Honourable Justice Cronin of the Family Court of Australia considered applications made by both the wife and the husband in ongoing family law proceedings. The dispute involved various interlocutory matters, including the release of information obtained via subpoena, access to property for valuation, disclosure of a child's residential address, and the sale of a property.

The court was required to determine several legal issues. These included whether objections to the release of information provided by Westpac Bank and the Department of Immigration and Border Control should be upheld, and whether the wife should be compelled to provide access to a property for valuation purposes and disclose the names of engineers involved in its repair or alteration. The court also considered the husband's application for the sale of a property and the wife's obligation to provide the residential address of a child and documents relating to the estate of Mr SS.

Justice Cronin dismissed the wife's objections to the release of information from Westpac Bank and the Department of Immigration and Border Control, ordering that such information be made available to all parties. The wife was also ordered to provide access to the property at O Street, Suburb P for valuation and to disclose the names of engineers involved in its maintenance. Furthermore, the wife was directed to provide the residential address of the child E and copies of documents pertaining to the estate of Mr SS to the husband's solicitors. The husband's application for the sale of the property at M Street, Suburb N was dismissed. The court adjourned the determination of all outstanding interlocutory issues to a future date.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That the wife’s application filed 25 November 2016 (save paragraph 11, 13 and 14) is adjourned to 10.00am on 2 February 2017 for the determination of all outstanding interlocutory issues.

2.

That save for the orders sought by the husband as set out below and granted by the court, the balance of the husband’s application filed 1 December 2016 is also adjourned to 10.00am on 2 February 2017.

3.

That the objections of the wife to the release of information provided under subpoenae by Westpac Bank and the Department of Immigration and Border Control are both dismissed and any information provided thereunder is released to all parties for inspection and copying.

4.

That by 4.00pm on Wednesday 7 December 2016 the wife provide to valuers RR the access key and the alarm code to the real property at O Street, Suburb P together with the names of the engineers involved in the repair of, alteration to or protection of the said property and upon the valuation being completed by RR the key be immediately returned to the wife.

5.

That by 4.00pm on Wednesday 7 December 2016 the wife provide to the solicitors for the husband by email the residential address of the child E.

6.

That the conciliation conference listed for 7 December 2016 is vacated.

7.

That the application by the husband (paragraph 2) for the sale of the property at M Street, Suburb N is dismissed.

8.

That by 4.00pm on 7 December 2016 the wife provide by email to the solicitors for the husband a copy of the inventory of assets and liabilities of the Estate of Mr SS along with a copy of his will and copies of all correspondence to and from the wife and the legal representatives acting on behalf of the Estate of the Late said Mr SS.

9.

Reserve the husband’s costs to the return date.

IT IS CERTIFIED:

10.

That pursuant to Order 19.50 of the Family Law Rules 2004 it was reasonable to engage counsel to attend.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.