FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nandutu v Chapman [2020] FCA 1798
Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Nandutu v Chapman [2019] FCCA 3715 File number: NSD 2104 of 2019 Judgment of: STEWART J Date of judgment: 14 December 2020 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application seeking leave to appeal against orders made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where appellant failed to appear – whether application should be dismissed under r 35.33(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether appellant had proper notice of listing – application dismissed Legislation: Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act1999 (Cth) s 17A
Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1)(d), 24(1A), 24(1D)(ca)
Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 11.01(5), 35.33(1)(a)(i), 36.74(1)
Division: General Division Registry: New South Wales National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights Number of paragraphs: 18 Date of hearing: 14 December 2020 Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear Counsel for the Respondent: G Johnson Solicitor for the Respondent: MinterEllison ORDERS
NSD 2104 of 2019 BETWEEN: SUSAN KANA NANDUTU
Appellant
AND: SIMON CHAPMAN
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
STEWART J
DATE OF ORDER:
14 DECEMBER 2020
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The appellant’s application for leave to appeal from an order of the Federal Circuit Court is dismissed.
2.The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs as agreed or taxed.
3.On or before 18 December 2020 the respondent is to file an application under r 36.74(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) in relation to the appellant’s appeal from the orders of the Federal Circuit Court given in Nandutu v Chapman (No 2) [2019] FCCA 3718.
4.The respondent is to serve the application referred to at Order 3 above and these orders by sending them to the email addresses and to the PO Box postal address of the appellant on record.
5.The respondent's application referred to at Order 3 above is listed for hearing before Justice Stewart at 9.30 am on 29 January 2021.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Revised from the transcript)STEWART J:
Listed for hearing today is the appellant’s application for leave to appeal against certain orders made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia on 18 December 2019. She is referred to as the appellant rather than the applicant for two reasons. One is that in the same proceeding she also appeals as of right against certain orders of the Circuit Court made on the same day in the same proceeding – I will come to those. The other is that she has not filed an application for leave to appeal but accepted during case management some time back that she required leave to appeal. Her notice of appeal, and subsequently her amended notice of appeal, has been taken as her application for leave to appeal so far as it refers to the orders in respect of which she requires leave.
Continue reading Nandutu v Chapman
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Nandutu v Chapman [2020] FCA 1798
- Case
- [2020] FCA 1798
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court found that the appellant had not demonstrated that they had proper notice of the listing, and that the orders made by the Federal Circuit Court were valid. The court held that the appellant’s application for leave to appeal should be dismissed under r 35.33(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), as the application was frivolous or vexatious. The court further held that the appellant had failed to provide any evidence to support their claim that they had not received proper notice of the listing.
The court dismissed the appellant's application for leave to appeal and ordered that the appellant pay the respondent's costs as agreed or taxed. The court also ordered that the respondent file an application under r 36.74(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) in relation to the appellant’s appeal from the orders of the Federal Circuit Court given in Nandutu v Chapman (No 2) [2019] FCCA 3718. The respondent's application was listed for hearing before Justice Stewart at 9.30 am on 29 January 2021.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The appellant’s application for leave to appeal from an order of the Federal Circuit Court is dismissed.
2. The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs as agreed or taxed.
3. On or before 18 December 2020 the respondent is to file an application under r 36.74(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) in relation to the appellant’s appeal from the orders of the Federal Circuit Court given in Nandutu v Chapman (No 2) [2019] FCCA 3718.
4. The respondent is to serve the application referred to at Order 3 above and these orders by sending them to the email addresses and to the PO Box postal address of the appellant on record.
5. The respondent's application referred to at Order 3 above is listed for hearing before Justice Stewart at 9.30 am on 29 January 2021.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.