Nandutu v Chapman

Case [2020] FCA 1798


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Nandutu v Chapman [2020] FCA 1798

Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Nandutu v Chapman [2019] FCCA 3715
File number: NSD 2104 of 2019
Judgment of: STEWART J
Date of judgment: 14 December 2020
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application seeking leave to appeal against orders made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – where appellant failed to appear – whether application should be dismissed under r 35.33(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) – whether appellant had proper notice of listing – application dismissed
Legislation:

Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act1999 (Cth) s 17A

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24(1)(d), 24(1A), 24(1D)(ca)

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 11.01(5), 35.33(1)(a)(i), 36.74(1)

Division: General Division
Registry: New South Wales
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Number of paragraphs: 18
Date of hearing: 14 December 2020
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondent: G Johnson
Solicitor for the Respondent: MinterEllison

ORDERS

NSD 2104 of 2019
BETWEEN:

SUSAN KANA NANDUTU

Appellant

AND:

SIMON CHAPMAN

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

STEWART J

DATE OF ORDER:

14 DECEMBER 2020

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The appellant’s application for leave to appeal from an order of the Federal Circuit Court is dismissed.

2.The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs as agreed or taxed.

3.On or before 18 December 2020 the respondent is to file an application under r 36.74(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) in relation to the appellant’s appeal from the orders of the Federal Circuit Court given in Nandutu v Chapman (No 2) [2019] FCCA 3718.

4.The respondent is to serve the application referred to at Order 3 above and these orders by sending them to the email addresses and to the PO Box postal address of the appellant on record.

5.The respondent's application referred to at Order 3 above is listed for hearing before Justice Stewart at 9.30 am on 29 January 2021.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Revised from the transcript)

STEWART J:

  1. Listed for hearing today is the appellant’s application for leave to appeal against certain orders made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia on 18 December 2019.  She is referred to as the appellant rather than the applicant for two reasons.  One is that in the same proceeding she also appeals as of right against certain orders of the Circuit Court made on the same day in the same proceeding – I will come to those.  The other is that she has not filed an application for leave to appeal but accepted during case management some time back that she required leave to appeal.  Her notice of appeal, and subsequently her amended notice of appeal, has been taken as her application for leave to appeal so far as it refers to the orders in respect of which she requires leave.

Continue reading Nandutu v Chapman

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Nandutu v Chapman [2020] FCA 1798
Case
[2020] FCA 1798
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nandutu was the appellant and Chapman the respondent in this case, which involved an application seeking leave to appeal against orders made by the Federal Circuit Court of Australia. The appellant had previously failed to appear before the Federal Circuit Court, resulting in certain orders being made against them. The appellant sought to appeal those orders on the basis that they had not received proper notice of the listing, and therefore, the orders should be quashed. The legal issues before the court were whether the application should be dismissed under r 35.33(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), and whether the appellant had proper notice of the listing.

The court found that the appellant had not demonstrated that they had proper notice of the listing, and that the orders made by the Federal Circuit Court were valid. The court held that the appellant’s application for leave to appeal should be dismissed under r 35.33(1)(a)(i) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), as the application was frivolous or vexatious. The court further held that the appellant had failed to provide any evidence to support their claim that they had not received proper notice of the listing.

The court dismissed the appellant's application for leave to appeal and ordered that the appellant pay the respondent's costs as agreed or taxed. The court also ordered that the respondent file an application under r 36.74(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) in relation to the appellant’s appeal from the orders of the Federal Circuit Court given in Nandutu v Chapman (No 2) [2019] FCCA 3718. The respondent's application was listed for hearing before Justice Stewart at 9.30 am on 29 January 2021.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appellant’s application for leave to appeal from an order of the Federal Circuit Court is dismissed.

2. The appellant is to pay the respondent’s costs as agreed or taxed.

3. On or before 18 December 2020 the respondent is to file an application under r 36.74(1) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) in relation to the appellant’s appeal from the orders of the Federal Circuit Court given in Nandutu v Chapman (No 2) [2019] FCCA 3718.

4. The respondent is to serve the application referred to at Order 3 above and these orders by sending them to the email addresses and to the PO Box postal address of the appellant on record.

5. The respondent's application referred to at Order 3 above is listed for hearing before Justice Stewart at 9.30 am on 29 January 2021.

Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.