Murphy v All Steel Sheds

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Murphy v All Steel Sheds [2021] NSWCATCD 45
Hearing dates: On the papers
Date of orders: 24 June 2021
Decision date: 24 June 2021
Jurisdiction:Consumer and Commercial Division
Before: K Ross, Senior Member
Decision:

1. Pursuant to s 50 (2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2014, a hearing of the costs applications is dispensed with.

2. Each party is to pay his or its own costs up until 19 March 2020.

3. Michael Murphy is to pay All Steel Sheds Pty Ltd’s costs of the proceedings from 20 March 2020, on an ordinary basis, as agreed or assessed.

Catchwords:

COSTS — Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013

Legislation Cited:

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)

Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules (NSW)

Cases Cited:

Thompson v Chapman [2016] NSWCATAP 6

Mison v Bennett Property (NSW) Pty Ltd [2018] NSWCATAP 138

Category:Costs
Parties:

Michael Murphy (Applicant)

All Steel Sheds Pty Ltd (Respondent)
Representation:

Solicitors:

Conrad Curry (Applicant)

Keystone Lawyers 9Respondent)
File Number(s): HB 19/32187
Publication restriction: unrestricted

REASONS FOR DECISION

Application

  1. This dispute arises out of residential building work carried out by All Steel Sheds Pty Ltd (“All Steel Sheds”) for Michael Murphy (“the Homeowner”). The Homeowner commenced proceedings seeking damages as follows:

  • for completion of the house $42,000.00 (being $75,000 less $33,000 outstanding under the contract)

  • for consequential loss for delay (rent paid for alternate premises) $5,106.37

  • Interest on the sum of $42,000.00 from 27 May 2019 to 28 September 2020 (and continuing at the rate of $4.97 per day) $2,811.52

  1. The Tribunal found that the Homeowner was entitled to damages of $45,000 for the incomplete work, but that $41,000 outstanding under the contract with the respondent had to be offset against the amount of damages. The Tribunal also allowed an offset for an agreed variation in the sum of $735.00. On 20 May 2021 the Tribunal ordered All Steel Sheds to pay the Homeowner. the sum of $3265.00 on or before 18 June 2021.

  2. The Tribunal provided for submissions as to costs. Both parties seek that the Tribunal make an order that the other party pay its costs:

  1. The Homeowner seeks his costs on an ordinary basis;

  2. All Steel Sheds seeks that the Homeowner pay its costs on an ordinary basis up until 19 March 2020, and on an indemnity basis thereafter, or alternatively, each party pays its own costs up until 19 March 2020, and the Homeowner pay the respondent’s costs on an indemnity basis thereafter.

  1. This is the decision in respect of the cost applications.

Should a hearing be dispensed with?

  1. Both parties were directed to make submissions as to whether a hearing should be dispensed with. Neither party did so.

  2. I am satisfied that it is in the interest of the Tribunal’s guiding principle for a hearing of the costs applications to be dispensed with. The issues to be determined are not complex, Both parties have made written submissions which allow me…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Murphy v All Steel Sheds and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2021] NSWCATCD 45
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Murphy v All Steel Sheds, the parties involved were Michael Murphy, the applicant, and All Steel Sheds Pty Ltd, the respondent. The dispute centred on the construction of a shed by All Steel Sheds for Mr. Murphy, which was alleged to have been defective. The matter was brought before the Civil and Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in New South Wales. The applicant sought a declaration that the respondent's conduct amounted to unconscionable behaviour, an order for the respondent to pay damages and an order for the respondent to pay the applicant's costs.

The primary legal issue before the tribunal was whether the conduct of All Steel Sheds Pty Ltd amounted to unconscionable behaviour under the Australian Consumer Law. The applicant argued that the respondent's actions were misleading and deceptive, and that the respondent had taken advantage of his vulnerability. The respondent, on the other hand, argued that the applicant had been fully informed of the terms of the contract and that there was no evidence of unconscionable behaviour.

In delivering the decision, the tribunal noted that there was no evidence of unconscionable behaviour on the part of the respondent. The tribunal found that the applicant had been fully aware of the terms of the contract and that the respondent had acted in good faith. The tribunal also found that the applicant had not been disadvantaged in any way by the respondent's conduct. As such, the tribunal dismissed the applicant's claims and ordered that each party pay their own costs up until 19 March 2020. The tribunal further ordered that the applicant pay the respondent's costs of the proceedings from 20 March 2020, on an ordinary basis, as agreed or assessed.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to s 50 (2) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2014, a hearing of the costs applications is dispensed with.

2. Each party is to pay his or its own costs up until 19 March 2020.

3. Michael Murphy is to pay All Steel Sheds Pty Ltd’s costs of the proceedings from 20 March 2020, on an ordinary basis, as agreed or assessed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.