LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: Munns v Wharley & Ors [2016] QLC 35* PARTIES: Dale Frank Munns
(applicant)v Peter Andrew Wharley, Allison Denise Wharley and Fay Rose Walker
(respondents)FILE NO: MRA099-15 DIVISION: General Division PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for grant of mining claims. DELIVERED ON: 10 June 2016 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARD ON: Submissions closed on 20 May 2016 HEARD AT: Heard on the papers JUDICIAL REGISTRAR: GJ Smith
ORDERS: 1. Compensation payable by the applicant to the respondents for the grant of MC 72387 is determined in the sum of $1,071 per annum for the first year and that sum as adjusted in accordance with the Consumer Price Index in each subsequent year of the tenure.
2. That the compensation pursuant to Order 1 shall be paid per annum in advance. It shall be paid within one month of the date of grant of the mining claim and in each subsequent year on the anniversary date of the date of grant.
CATCHWORDS: MINING CLAIM – determination of compensation – grant – factors to be considered – direct impact on land – diminution in value – balance land – administrative time –
valuation report – items claimable – consequence of the grant.Mineral Resources Act 1989, s 85
Land Court Rules 2000, Rule 36AMatrix Metals Limited v The North Australian Pastoral Company Pty Ltd [2007] QLC 075
Mitchell v Oakhill and Mitchell (Unreported, Land Court of Queensland, JJ Trickett, President, 10 March 1998)
Richardson & Ors v Wharley & Ors [2015] QLC 6
Sullivan v Oil Company of Australia Ltd (No.2.) (2004) 2 Qd R 105
Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No. 2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297APPEARANCES: Not applicable
This matter involves a referral to the Land Court pursuant to s 85(12) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the grant of a mining claim.
Background
The applicant Dale Frank Munns (the applicant) applied for the grant of mining claim 72387 on 19 August 2014. The land upon which the proposed mining claim is located is approximately 80 km north-west of Emerald, within the Emerald Mining District. The land is within the Central Highlands Regional Council local government area. The purpose of the proposed grant is for the mining of Sapphire and Zircon.
The land upon which the mining claim and access track is situated is owned by Peter Andrew Wharley, Allison Denise Wharley and Fay Rose Walker (the respondents). The land is known as “Reklaw Park” and is more particularly described as Lot 10 on CLM673 GHPL 12/2424. It is approximately 12,300 hectares in area and is used for grazing purposes.
The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows:
Court Reference Tenure ID Tenure Area Purpose Term MRA099-15 MC72387 19.95 ha Sapphire, Zircon 10 years
Relevant Legislation
Section 85 of the MRA provides that a mining claim shall not be granted or renewed unless compensation has been determined (whether…
Continue reading Munns v Wharley
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Munns v Wharley [2016] QLC 35
- Case
- [2016] QLC 35
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the court were whether the compensation payable was correctly calculated, and what factors should be considered in determining compensation for the grant of a mining claim. The court needed to consider the direct impact of the mining claim on the land, the diminution in value of the land, and the balance land. Additionally, the court had to assess the administrative time required for the valuation report and the items claimable as a consequence of the grant.
The court, after reviewing the evidence and applicable legislation, determined that the compensation payable by Munns to Wharley for the grant of mining claim 72387 should be $1,071 per annum for the first year, adjusted annually according to the Consumer Price Index. The court held that the compensation should be paid per annum in advance, within one month of the date of grant, and on the anniversary of the grant date in subsequent years. The court found that the applicant's valuation report adequately covered the necessary factors and that the compensation was appropriately calculated based on the evidence presented.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Compensation payable by the applicant to the respondents for the grant of MC 72387 is determined in the sum of $1,071 per annum for the first year and that sum as adjusted in accordance with the Consumer Price Index in each subsequent year of the tenure.
2. That the compensation pursuant to Order 1 shall be paid per annum in advance. It shall be paid within one month of the date of grant of the mining claim and in each subsequent year on the anniversary date of the date of grant.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.