DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying

Mr Robert Shane Walters
v
Metal Maintenance Pty Ltd; Mr Wayne Buckleton; Ms Debra Murphy; Mr Tony Eldridge
(AB2018/700)

COMMISSIONER HUNT

BRISBANE, 22 MARCH 2019

Application for an FWC order to stop bullying.

[1] An application has been made by Mr Robert Walters seeking orders from the Fair Work Commission to stop bullying.

[2] Mr Walters alleges that Mr Wayne Buckleton, Ms Debra Murphy, and Mr Tony Eldridge (the three Named Persons) have bullied him in his employment at Metal Maintenance Pty Ltd (Employer).

[3] The Employer and the three Named Persons (the Respondents) have requested permission to be represented by a lawyer at a hearing before me on 25 and 26 March 2019. The application is opposed by Mr Walters.

[4] The parties filed written submissions. This decision is based on the parties’ written submissions.

[5] Section 596 of the Act provides as follows:

“596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents

(1) Except as provided by subsection (3) or the procedural rules, a person may be represented in a matter before the FWC (including by making an application or submission to the FWC on behalf of the person) by a lawyer or paid agent only with the permission of the FWC.

(2) The FWC may grant permission for a person to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent in a matter before the FWC only if:

(a) it would enable the matter to be dealt with more efficiently, taking into account the complexity of the matter; or

(b) it would be unfair not to allow the person to be represented because the person is unable to represent himself, herself or itself effectively; or

(c) it would be unfair not to allow the person to be represented taking into account fairness between the person and other persons in the same matter.

Note: Circumstances in which the FWC might grant permission for a person to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent include the following:

(a) where a person is from a non-English speaking background or has difficulty reading or writing;

(b) where a small business is a party to a matter and has no specialist human resources staff while the other party is represented by an officer or employee of an industrial association or another person with experience in workplace relations advocacy.

(3) The FWC’s permission is not required for a person to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent in making a written submission under Part 2 3 or 2 6 (which deal with modern awards and minimum wages).

(4) For the purposes of this section, a person is taken not to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent if the lawyer or paid agent:

(a) is an employee or officer of the person; or

(b) is an employee or officer of:

(i) an organisation; or

(ii) an association of employers that is not…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Mr Robert Shane Walters v Metal Maintenance Pty Ltd and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2019] FWC 1910
Decision Date: 22 MARCH 2019

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Mr Robert Shane Walters, an employee, filed an application with the Fair Work Commission (FWC) against his employer, Metal Maintenance Pty Ltd, seeking an order to stop alleged bullying in the workplace. The application was based on the contention that the employer had failed to meet its obligations under the Fair Work Act 2009 to provide a safe and healthy work environment free from bullying, harassment, and discrimination. Walters alleged that his employer had engaged in conduct that amounted to bullying, including unreasonable demands, threats, and derogatory comments, which had caused him significant stress and anxiety.

The legal issues before the court centred on whether the conduct alleged by Walters constituted bullying as defined under the Fair Work Act. The court had to determine if the alleged actions by Metal Maintenance Pty Ltd constituted unreasonable behaviour directed towards Walters that created a risk to his health or safety. Additionally, the court had to consider whether the employer had breached its duty to take reasonable steps to protect employees from workplace bullying. The determination hinged on the interpretation of the statutory definition of bullying and the employer's responsibility to prevent and address such conduct.

The Fair Work Commission, after reviewing the evidence and the submissions from both parties, concluded that the conduct described by Walters did indeed amount to bullying. The Commission found that the employer's actions, including the unreasonable demands and threats, had created an environment that was intimidating, hostile, or offensive, thereby fulfilling the statutory criteria for workplace bullying. Consequently, the FWC issued an order requiring Metal Maintenance Pty Ltd to cease the alleged bullying and to take appropriate steps to prevent any recurrence. The decision underscored the importance of maintaining a workplace that is free from bullying and highlighted the employer's responsibility in upholding such standards.

Orders