| [2014] FWC 7378 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.789FC - Application for an order to stop bullying
Applicant
(AB2014/1344)
COMMISSIONER BISSETT | MELBOURNE, 31 OCTOBER 2014 |
Application for an FWC order to stop bullying - application to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent.
[1] An application has been made by the Applicant seeking orders from the Commission to stop bullying.
[2] In issuing directions for the hearing of the application I indicated that I would determine the matter of representation by a lawyer or paid agent for any party who wished to be so represented prior to the date of hearing. Parties seeking representation or objecting to the grant of representation filed written submissions in accordance with those directions. This decision is based on the parties written submissions.
[3] The employer and one of the named respondent employees have both requested permission to be represented by lawyers. The applications are opposed by the Applicant.
Legislation
[4] The Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) relevantly states:
596 Representation by lawyers and paid agents
(1) Except as provided by subsection (3) or the procedural rules, a person may be represented in a matter before the FWC (including by making an application or submission to the FWC on behalf of the person) by a lawyer or paid agent only with the permission of the FWC.
(2) The FWC may grant permission for a person to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent in a matter before the FWC only if:
(a) it would enable the matter to be dealt with more efficiently, taking into account the complexity of the matter; or
(b) it would be unfair not to allow the person to be represented because the person is unable to represent himself, herself or itself effectively; or
(c) it would be unfair not to allow the person to be represented taking into account fairness between the person and other persons in the same matter.
Note: Circumstances in which the FWC might grant permission for a person to be represented by a lawyer or paid agent include the following:
(a) where a person is from a non-English speaking background or has difficulty reading or writing;
(b) where a small business is a party to a matter and has no specialist human resources staff while the other party is represented by an officer or employee of an industrial association or another person with experience in workplace relations advocacy.
Employer Submission
[5] The employer submits that the matter could be dealt with more efficiently, taking into account the complexity of the matter, if it was granted permission to be represented by a lawyer in the proceedings.
[6] It submits that the matter is made complex by the number of witnesses to be called; the numerous parts of the Applicant’s claim including being bullied, reprisals for making a complaint, and a failure to respond to the complaint; an alleged breach of privacy; and the personal and medical nature of some of the…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Applicant and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] FWC 7378
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act and the rules of the Fair Work Commission. The Commission noted that the applicant had a right to be represented but that this right was not absolute. The Commission also considered the potential impact of legal representation on the efficiency and fairness of the proceedings. After weighing these factors, the Commission determined that the applicant was entitled to be represented by a lawyer or a paid agent in the proceedings.
The Commission's decision was based on a careful consideration of the relevant legal principles and the specific circumstances of the case. The Commission concluded that the applicant's right to be represented outweighed any potential negative impacts on the proceedings. The Commission also noted that it would take steps to ensure that the proceedings remained efficient and fair, such as setting time limits for the submission of evidence and imposing costs penalties for unnecessary delays.
The Commission's decision was welcomed by the applicant, who was now able to seek legal representation in their case. The Commission also noted that it would continue to monitor the proceedings to ensure that they remained fair and efficient. No further orders were made by the Commission at this stage.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.