Legal Research
Cases
Mostafa v Sherif (No 2)

Mostafa v Sherif (No 2)

Case [2020] VCC 1901

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Mostafa v Sherif (No 2) [2020] VCC 1901
Case: [2020] VCC 1901
Decision Date: 2 December 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Mostafa v Sherif (No 2) [2020] VCC 1901

Most Recent Citation

Visedo v State of Victoria (Ruling) [2022] VCC 1302

Cases Citing This Decision

Visedo v State of Victoria [2022] VCC 1822
Citation 1

…: Watson v Marshall and Cade (1971) 124 CLR 621; Symes v Mahon [1922] SASR 447; O'Doherty v McMahon (1971) VR 625; Mostafa v Sherif & Anor (No 2) [2020] VCC 1901; Bantick v Boss Properties Pty Ltd (No 2) [2000] VSC 165 Ruling: Refer below…
Visedo v State of Victoria (Ruling) [2022] VCC 1273
Citation 2

…cal Court Act 2007 (NSW); Local Government Act 2020; Supreme Court Act 1986; Civil Procedure Act 2010 Cases Cited: Mostafa v Sherif and Anor (No 2) [2020] VCC 1901 Ruling: The plaintiffs’ costs are ordered on the appropriate Magistrates’ Court Scale of Costs. No Order for Costs on this application.…
Visedo v State of Victoria (Ruling) [2022] VCC 1302
Citation 3

…cal Court Act 2007 (NSW); Local Government Act 2020; Supreme Court Act 1986; Civil Procedure Act 2010 Cases Cited: Mostafa v Sherif and Anor (No 2) [2020] VCC 1901 Ruling: The plaintiffs’ costs are ordered on the appropriate Magistrates’ Court Scale of Costs. No Order for Costs on this application.…

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

McFadzean v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2007] VSCA 289
Citation 1

…mpbell & Co v Pollak [1927] AC 732; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; McFadzean and Ors v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and O rs (2007) 20 VR 250; Oshlack v Richmond City Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Ritter v Godfrey (1920) 2 KB 47; Taylor v Pace Developments Pty Ltd [1991] BCC 406; Woolf v Burmo…
Auspine Staff Superannuation Pty Ltd v Henderson (No 2) [2006] FCA 1533
Citation 2

…atchwords: Rule 63A.24 Legislation Cited: County Court Act 1958 (Vic); County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018 (Vic) Cases Cited: Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4; Donald Campbell & Co v Pollak [1927] AC 732; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; McFadzean and Ors v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Unio…
NBIF v Minister for Immigration [2006] FMCA 182
Citation 3

…ey (1990) 170 CLR 534; McFadzean and Ors v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and O rs (2007) 20 VR 250; Oshlack v Richmond City Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Ritter v Godfrey (1920) 2 KB 47; Taylor v Pace Developments Pty Ltd [1991] BCC 406; Woolf v Burmon (1939) 13 ALJR 431.…
Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59
Citation 4

…urt Civil Procedure Rules 2018 (Vic) Cases Cited: Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4; Donald Campbell & Co v Pollak [1927] AC 732; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534; McFadzean and Ors v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and O rs (2007) 20 VR 250; Oshlack v Richmond City Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Ri…
Ritter v Godfrey [1922] HCA 62
Citation 5

…Ors v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and O rs (2007) 20 VR 250; Oshlack v Richmond City Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Ritter v Godfrey (1920) 2 KB 47; Taylor v Pace Developments Pty Ltd [1991] BCC 406; Woolf v Burmon (1939) 13 ALJR 431.…

AI Chat coming soon