Moore v Chief Executive Officer, Public Safety Business Agency

Case [2015] QCAT 123


CITATION: Moore v Chief Executive Officer, Public Safety Business Agency [2015] QCAT 123
PARTIES: Ian Francis Moore
(Applicant)
v
Chief Executive Officer, Public Safety Business Agency
(Respondent)
APPLICATION NUMBER: CML237–14
MATTER TYPE: Childrens matters
HEARING DATE: 26 March 2015
HEARD AT: Innisfail
DECISION OF: Member Johnston
DELIVERED ON: 20 April 2015
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE: The decision of the Public Safety Business Agency dated 13 November 2014 to issue a negative notice to Ian Francis Moore is set aside and the Tribunal directs that a positive notice be issued.
CATCHWORDS:

CHILDRENS MATTER – BLUE CARD – REVIEW – where applicant seeks a review of the Agency’s decision to cancel a blue card and issue a negative notice – whether exceptional case exists – whether not in the best interests of children to issue a positive notice – where change in criminal history

Working with Children (Risk Management and Screening) Act 2000 ss 261, 266
Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2009 s 66

APPEARANCES:

APPLICANT: Ian Francis Moore
RESPONDENT: Peter Reid, in house counsel for the Public Safety Business Agency

REASONS FOR DECISION

Background

  1. On 22 October 2012, the Applicant, Ian Francis Moore, was issued with a blue card by the Commission for Children and Young People and Child Guardian. The blue card functions are now administered by the Public Safety Business Agency (the Respondent).

  2. Pursuant to the provisions of the Working with Children (Risk Management and Screening) Act 2000 (the Act), the Respondent was advised by the Queensland Police Service on 12 May 2014 of a change to the Applicant’s police information.

  3. The Applicant was invited to make submissions about why the Respondent should not cancel the positive notice and blue card and issue a negative notice. The Applicant provided one written reference in response to the request for submissions.

  4. On 13 November 2014, the Respondent cancelled the positive notice and blue card and issued a negative notice and provided the Applicant with a written notice outlining the decision, the reasons for the decision and the relevant review information.

  5. On 1 December 2014, the Applicant lodged an application with the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal (the Tribunal) to review the Respondent’s decision that the Applicant's case was an ‘exceptional case’ in which it would not be in the best interests of children for the Applicant to be issued with a positive notice and blue card.

Mr Moore

  1. Mr Moore has a history of smoking marijuana that goes back to his teenage years.

  2. His partner of four years Debra Kaminski was not prepared to accept the use of marijuana in her home and Mr Moore was required to leave.

  3. Mr Moore has been attending the Alcohol Tobacco and Other Drugs Agency (ATOD’s) since November 2014 to deal with his drug addictions.

  4. He was involved in an altercation on 10 May 2014 with the 24-year-old son of his partner Luke where a cane knife was thrust into a pole to cause fear. He admitted trying to scare Luke and acknowledged…

Continue reading Moore v Chief Executive Officer, Public Safety Business Agen...

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Moore v Chief Executive Officer, Public Safety Business Agency [2015] QCAT 123
Case
[2015] QCAT 123
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Moore v Chief Executive Officer, Public Safety Business Agency, the applicant sought a review of the Public Safety Business Agency's decision to cancel his blue card and issue a negative notice. The applicant, Ian Francis Moore, challenged the decision on the grounds that it was not in the best interests of children to issue a negative notice and that an exceptional case existed warranting a positive notice. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia was tasked with considering these arguments.

The court was required to determine whether the Agency's decision was legally sound and whether an exceptional case existed that would warrant a positive notice despite the applicant's criminal history. The key issue was whether the changes in the applicant's criminal history and his efforts to rehabilitate himself constituted sufficient grounds for an exceptional case. The court needed to weigh the potential risk to children against the applicant's demonstrated commitment to personal improvement and the absence of any recent incidents.

The court found that the applicant's criminal history, while significant, had not been updated for some time, and he had taken steps towards rehabilitation. The court was satisfied that the applicant's efforts to change his circumstances and the lack of any recent incidents indicated that the risk to children was minimal. Consequently, the court concluded that the Agency's decision to issue a negative notice was not justified, and an exceptional case did exist that warranted a positive notice. The court set aside the decision of the Public Safety Business Agency dated 13 November 2014 and directed that a positive notice be issued instead.

Orders

Orders of the court

The decision of the Public Safety Business Agency dated 13 November 2014 to issue a negative notice to Ian Francis Moore is set aside and the Tribunal directs that a positive notice be issued.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.