FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| MOK & SUWAN | [2021] FamCA 10 |
| FAMILY LAW – MARRIAGE – NULLITY – Application for declaration of nullity of marriage – Where it is alleged that at the time of the marriage the husband was lawfully married to another person – Application granted |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 51 Marriage Act 1961 (Cth) ss 23, 23B |
| FIRST APPLICANT: | Mr Mok |
| SECOND APPLICANT: | Ms Suwan |
| FILE NUMBER: | HBC | 1019 | of | 2020 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 11 January 2021 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Hobart |
| PLACE HEARD: | Hobart |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Benjamin J |
| HEARING DATE: | 11 January 2021 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Mr Kang |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Rivers Lawyers Pty Ltd |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr Kang |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Rivers Lawyers Pty Ltd |
Orders and declarations
It is declared that the marriage between Mr Mok (‘the husband’) and Ms Suwan (‘the wife’) solemnised in 2018 in Country B (‘the Marriage’) is void.
Consequently a decree of nullity in relation to the Marriage is granted.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Mok & Suwan has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)
.
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT HOBART |
FILE NUMBER: HBC1019/2020
| Mr Mok |
First applicant
And
| Ms Suwan |
Second applicant
EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
INTRODUCTION
By way of a joint Initiating Application filed 14 October 2020 Mr Mok (‘the husband’) and Ms Suwan (‘the wife’) seek an order declaring that their marriage celebrated in Country B in 2018 is void and that the marriage is a nullity. The husband and wife were jointly represented by Mr Kang of Rivers Lawyers Pty Ltd.
The basis of that application is that the husband was, at the time of the parties’ marriage in 2018, lawfully married to another person.
BACKGROUND
The husband was born in 1990 in Country C. At the time of the hearing was aged 30. He presently lives in Hobart, Tasmania.
The wife was born in 1983. She is aged 37. She also presently lives in Hobart, Tasmania.
The husband and Ms D (‘the husband’s first wife’) met in 2013. The husband was living in Country C at the time and the husband’s first wife was living in Country F. Their relationship developed over time and they were subsequently married in Country F in 2014 (‘the husband’s first marriage’).
Conflict arose during the first marriage between the husband and the first wife and their relationship broke down. They separated on 10 April 2015, signed a deed of separation on 26 June 2015 and commenced…
Continue reading MOK & SUWAN
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- MOK & SUWAN [2021] FamCA 10
- Case
- [2021] FamCA 10
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the marriage between Mr Mok and Ms Suwan was void *ab initio* due to the husband's pre-existing lawful marriage. This required the Court to determine if the conditions for a valid marriage under Australian law were met, specifically concerning the marital status of the parties at the time of the ceremony.
Benjamin J reasoned that a marriage entered into by a person who is already lawfully married is void under Australian law. Applying this principle, and being satisfied on the evidence that the husband was indeed married to another person at the time of his marriage to the wife, the Court found the marriage to be void. Consequently, the Court declared the marriage between Mr Mok and Ms Suwan void and granted a decree of nullity.
Orders
Orders of the court
Orders and declarations
1. It is declared that the marriage between Mr Mok (‘the husband’) and Ms Suwan (‘the wife’) solemnised in 2018 in Country B (‘the Marriage’) is void.
2. Consequently a decree of nullity in relation to the Marriage is granted.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Mok & Suwan has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.