MJN v JAB

Case [2008] QDC 302


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

MJN v JAB [2008] QDC 302

PARTIES:

MJN

Applicant

v

JAB

Respondent

FILE NO/S:

BD1985/08

DIVISION:

Civil

PROCEEDING:

Application for Criminal Compensation

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court, Beenleigh

DELIVERED ON:

12 December 2008

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

20 August 2008

JUDGE:

Tutt DCJ

ORDER:

1.    That the respondent JAB pay the sum of $8,250.00 to the applicant MJN for injury suffered by him including adverse impacts caused by the respondent to the applicant for which the respondent was convicted by the District Court at Beenleigh on 11 February 2005.

2.    No order as to costs.

CATCHWORDS:

Criminal compensation application – sexual offences against complainant child – mental or nervous shock assessment – “adverse impacts” under Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995.

Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 ss 20, 24, 25 (7)

Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995 s 1A

Ferguson v Kazakoff (2000) QSC 156

MR v Webb [2001] QCA 113

Re JI v AV [2001] QCA 510

SOLICITORS:

Ms J Fadden for the applicant

No appearance by or on behalf of the respondent

Introduction:

  1. The applicant MJN by his litigation guardian claims compensation under Part 3 of the Criminal Offence Victims Act 1995 (“the Act”) for injury the applicant sustained arising out of the criminal conduct of the respondent JAB who was convicted by the District Court at Beenleigh on 11 February 2005 of 4 offences of unlawfully and indecently dealing with a child under 16 years then under 12 years.

  1. The application is made on the basis of a “mental or nervous shock disorder” together with a claim under s 1A of the Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995 (“the Regulation”) on the basis that the applicant has suffered a number of “adverse impacts” as defined under s 1A(2) of the Regulation arising out of the sexual offences.

  1. The application for compensation is made pursuant to s 24 of the Act and is supported by the following material:

(a)        the affidavit with exhibits of the litigation guardian MN sworn 15 March 2008 and filed in this court on 23 July 2008;

(b)        the affidavit with the exhibits of Dr Barbara McGuire, Psychiatrist (“Dr McGuire”), sworn 25 March 2008 and filed in this Court on 23 July 2008;

(c)        the affidavit with the exhibits of Mandy Albert, Litigation Support Officer, sworn 18 July 2008 and filed in this Court on 23 July 2008;

(d)        the affidavit of service of Andrew Michael William Ward, Licensed Commercial Agent, sworn 2 August 2008 and filed in this Court on 5 August 2008.

Facts:

  1. The circumstances of the respondent’s criminal conduct are summarised in the submissions of the Crown prosecutor at the sentence hearing being Exhibit “B” to the affidavit of the said Mandy Albert and confirm that the respondent pleaded guilty to the offences referred to in paragraph [1] above.

Injury:

  1. The applicant’s injury is set out in the report dated 21 May 2007 from Dr McGuire, which is Exhibit “A” to her affidavit aforesaid.…

Continue reading MJN v JAB

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
MJN v JAB [2008] QDC 302
Case
[2008] QDC 302
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of MJN v JAB, the applicant sought compensation for injuries suffered, including mental or nervous shock, arising from sexual offences committed against a child, for which the respondent was convicted in the District Court at Beenleigh on 11 February 2005. The case was heard in the Supreme Court of Queensland, where the applicant applied for compensation under the Criminal Offence Victims Regulation 1995. The court was tasked with determining the amount of compensation to be awarded to the applicant for the adverse impacts caused by the respondent's actions.

The legal issues before the court involved assessing the extent of the mental or nervous shock suffered by the applicant as a result of the respondent's actions and determining the appropriate amount of compensation to be awarded under the Regulation. The court had to consider the severity and duration of the applicant's injuries, as well as the impact on the applicant's life, in making its decision. The court also needed to determine whether the applicant's injuries met the criteria for compensation under the Regulation.

In its reasoning, the court considered the evidence presented by both parties and the applicable legal principles. The court found that the applicant had suffered significant mental or nervous shock as a result of the respondent's actions, and that the injuries met the criteria for compensation under the Regulation. The court awarded the applicant the sum of $8,250.00 for the injury suffered, including the adverse impacts caused by the respondent. The court did not make any order as to costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. That the respondent JAB pay the sum of $8,250.00 to the applicant MJN for injury suffered by him including adverse impacts caused by the respondent to the applicant for which the respondent was convicted by the District Court at Beenleigh on 11 February 2005.

2. No order as to costs.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.