Mirja Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation

[2010] FCA 1435

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Mirja Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1435

Citation:		Mirja Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1435
Parties:		MIRJA HELENA DENLAY v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number:		QUD 348 of 2010
Judge:		LOGAN J
Date of judgment:		17 December 2010
Date of hearing:	14 - 16 September 2010
Place:	Brisbane
Division:	GENERAL DIVISION
Category:	No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs:	1
Counsel for the Applicant:	Mr BW Walker SC with Mr GES Ng
Solicitor for the Applicant:	Nyst Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondent:	Mr A Robertson SC and Mr M Wigney SC with Mr P Looney
Solicitor for the Respondent:	Australian Government Solicitor

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION	QUD 348 of 2010

BETWEEN:	MIRJA HELENA DENLAY Applicant
AND:	COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Respondent

JUDGE:	LOGAN J
DATE OF ORDER:	17 DECEMBER 2010
WHERE MADE:	BRISBANE

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The application is dismissed.

2.The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of and incidental to the application, to be taxed if not agreed.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.
The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court’s website.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION	QUD 348 of 2010

BETWEEN:	MIRJA HELENA DENLAY Applicant
AND:	COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION Respondent

JUDGE:	LOGAN J
DATE:	17 DECEMBER 2010
PLACE:	BRISBANE

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1. For the reasons outlined in my judgment in proceeding QUD 347 of 2010 – Kevin Vincent Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation (Kevin Denlay v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 1434) the application is dismissed with costs.

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Logan.

Associate:

Dated:       17 December 2010