Legal Research
Cases
Melbourne Property v St Kilda Estates (interest and costs)

Melbourne Property v St Kilda Estates (interest and costs)

Case [2020] VCC 1418

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Melbourne Property v St Kilda Estates (interest and costs) [2020] VCC 1418
Case: [2020] VCC 1418
Decision Date: 17 August 2020

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Melbourne Property v St Kilda Estates (interest and costs) [2020] VCC 1418

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Advisory Services Pty Ltd (trading as Ray White St Albans) v Augustin & Anor [2018] VSCA 95
Citation 1 (Para 4)

…On 19 April 2018, the Court of Appeal upheld my decision: Advisory Services Pty Ltd (t/a Ray White St Albans) v Augustin [2018] VSCA 95.…
Marriner v Australian Super Developments Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 141
Citation 2 (Para 2)

…costs consequences of non-acceptance of a Calderbank offer are summarised by the Court of Appeal in Marriner v Australian Super Developments Pty Ltd [2016] VSCA 141 at [234]: In Hazeldene’s Chicken Farm Pty Ltd v Victorian WorkCover Authorit y [No 2] , the Court of Appeal held that the rejection of a Calderbank o…
Victorian Workcover Authority v Kagan Bros Consolidated Pty Ltd [2011] VSCA 91
Citation 3 (Para 13)

…In Victorian WorkCover Authority v Kagan Bros Consolidated Pty Ltd [2011] VSCA 91 at [17], the Victorian Court of Appeal referred to the reasons of Nettle JA in Berrigan Shire Council v Ballerini (No 2) [2006] VSCA 65 at [40-42]. There Nettle JA summarised the circumstances in which a Sanderson (or Bullock) order…
Berrigan Shire Council v Ballerini (No 2) [2006] VSCA 65
Citation 4 (Para 13)

…dated Pty Ltd [2011] VSCA 91 at [17], the Victorian Court of Appeal referred to the reasons of Nettle JA in Berrigan Shire Council v Ballerini (No 2) [2006] VSCA 65 at [40-42]. There Nettle JA summarised the circumstances in which a Sanderson (or Bullock) order will not ordinarily be made: [17] The purport of the…
MLC Ltd v J & W Management Services P/L [2001] VSC 352
Citation 5 (Para 5)

…quent conduct, such as conduct during interlocutory applications or at trial may justify the costs order: MLC Ltd v J & W Management Services Pty Ltd [2001] VSC 352.…
Melbourne Property v St Kilda Estates [2020] VCC 570
Citation 6 (Para 1)

…This ruling deals with interest and costs disputes following the principal judgment in this proceeding: Melbourne Property v St Kilda Estates [2020] VCC 570. These reasons adopt the same definitions as that judgment.…
Advisory Services Pty Ltd v Augustin [2017] VCC 1195
Citation 7 (Para 3)

…ting to the validity of an exclusive sales agreement in the context of s49A of the Act. In that decision, Advisory Services Pty Ltd v Augustin & Anor [2017] VCC 1195, I found that the relevant agent was not entitled to sue for commission in the absence of the exclusive sales authority in question containing a stat…

AI Chat coming soon