Meese and Meese (No. 3)

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

MEESE & MEESE (NO. 3) [2018] FamCA 807
FAMILY LAW – CONTRAVENTION – where each count dismissed – consideration of costs – where applicant wholly unsuccessful – where application brought about by failure of respondent to provide children generally – no order as to costs.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117.
APPLICANT: Mr Meese
RESPONDENT: Ms Meese
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Mr P Smith
FILE NUMBER: CAC 773 of 2017
DATE DELIVERED: 28 September 2018
PLACE DELIVERED: Canberra
PLACE HEARD: Canberra
JUDGMENT OF: Gill J
HEARING DATE: 28 September 2018

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr M Carney, SC
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Farrar Gesini Dunn
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Andrew Warren Associates
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Legal Aid, ACT

Orders

  1. The interim application of the Father filed 12 September 2018 and returnable on 12 November 2018 is vacated from 12 November 2018 and listed for hearing at 10am on 9 October 2018.

IT IS NOTED THAT

  1. The Mother has been permitted to file in Court her response and responding material to that application today. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT

  1. The Father may file and serve any material he seeks to rely upon in reply to the Mother's material by 12pm on 5 October 2008.

IT IS NOTED THAT

  1. The hearing time will be limited to limited to 2 hours on that day.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT

  1. Any amended application in a case may be filed by the Father by midday on 5 October 2018.

  2. Provided the consent of the person who is the object of the subpoena is obtained, the parties are at liberty to issue such subpoenas as are necessary for the preparation of the interim hearing provided that they are returnable no later than 10am on 8 October 2018.

IT IS NOTED THAT

  1. The Mother’s responding material includes an application in relation to financial matters.  It has been indicated to the parties that the financial aspects of the application will not be reached on the next occasion and hence there is no necessity for those to be answered at this point.

  2. Directions will be given in respect of the interim financial matters on the next occasion.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT

  1. Each of the counts of contravention is dismissed.

  2. There being no order as to costs.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Meese & Meese (No. 3) has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT CANBERRA

FILE NUMBER: CAC 773 of 2017

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Meese and Meese (No. 3) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2018] FamCA 807
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Meese and Meese (No. 3)*, Gill J of the Family Court of Australia considered an interim application filed by the Father. The specific nature of the dispute is not detailed in the provided text, beyond the fact that it concerned an interim application made by the Father.

The primary legal issue before the court was the determination of the appropriate date for the hearing of the Father's interim application. The application had been filed on 12 September 2018 and was originally scheduled to be heard on 12 November 2018.

Gill J ordered that the interim application, previously listed for 12 November 2018, be vacated from that date. Instead, the hearing was rescheduled and listed for 10 am on 9 October 2018. This indicates a judicial decision to expedite the hearing of the Father's application.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The interim application of the Father filed 12 September 2018 and returnable on 12 November 2018 is vacated from 12 November 2018 and listed for hearing at 10am on 9 October 2018.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.