McPherson v Mount Isa Mines Ltd

Case [2019] QDC 37


DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

McPherson v Mount Isa Mines Ltd & Anor [2019] QDC  37

PARTIES:

JAMIE MCPHERSON

(plaintiff)

v

MOUNT ISA MINES LIMITED (ACN 009 661 447)

(first defendant)

and

MCA ENGINEERING GROUP PTY LIMITED

(ACN 166 079 885)

(second defendant)

FILE NO:

116/18

DIVISION:

Civil

PROCEEDING:

Application

ORIGINATING COURT:

District Court at Cairns

DELIVERED ON:

25 March 2019

DELIVERED AT:

Cairns

HEARING DATE:

22 March 2018

JUDGE:

Morzone QC DCJ

ORDER:

The first defendant has leave to file and serve a third party notice and statement of claim on MCA Engineering Pty Ltd ACN 149 957 353 on or before 29 March 2019.1.    

The second defendant’s application filed 27 February 2019 is adjourned to the registry for the registrar to fix a hearing date if requested by any party after that party gives the other parties at least three business days written notice.2.    

Unless either party applies for a different costs order, or the parties otherwise agree, within 14 days of this judgment, the costs of and incidental to the applications filed 27 February 2019 and 15 March 2019 will be each parties’ costs in the proceedings.3.    

CATCHWORDS:

CIVIL PROCEDURE – APPLICATION – DEFAULT JUDGMENT – Where the applicant seeks to issue a Third Party Statement of Claim to the third party- Second defendant applies for court ordered mediation - Negligence for damages – 192 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld.

Legislation
Law Reform Act 1995 (Qld)
Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld)
Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld)

Cases

MGM Containers Pty Ltd v Wockner [2006] QCA 502

Phonesivorabouth v Tops Services Pty Ltd (1992) 106 FLR 471

Villinger Group Ltd v Redmond [2009] QSC 60

COUNSEL:

L. Neil for the Plaintiff

J. Trevino for the First Defendant

J.M Sorbello for the Second Defendant

  1. The first defendant applies pursuant to rule 194 for leave to issue a Third Party Statement of Claim against a proposed third party, MCA Engineering Pty Ltd.  The second defendant opposes the application, and the plaintiff points to potential increased delay and costs.

  1. The second defendant applies for court ordered mediation of the proceeding, which is unopposed except its timing and participating parties will be subject of the determination of the first defendant’s application.

  1. The parties have provided detailed written outlines of argument, and made further oral submissions.

Background

  1. The plaintiff sues the first and second defendants in negligence for damages for personal injuries suffered while working at the Mt Isa Mine on 31 July 2016.

  1. The first defendant is the operator of the mine.  The second defendant operated a labour hire business and, at the time of the alleged injury, the plaintiff‘s services were provided by the second defendant to the first defendant pursuant to Purchase Order MCFUFR SRV.[1]

    [1]Statement of Claim, Court Document 1.

  1. After complying with the pre-court procedures under the Workers’ Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 (Qld) and Personal Injuries Proceedings Act 2002 (Qld), the plaintiff commenced proceedings on 28 June…

Continue reading McPherson v Mount Isa Mines Ltd

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
McPherson v Mount Isa Mines Ltd [2019] QDC 37
Case
[2019] QDC 37
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

McPherson brought proceedings against Mount Isa Mines Ltd, seeking damages for personal injury. The matter was before the court on the application of the first and second defendants to the proceeding. The first defendant sought leave to issue a Third Party Statement of Claim against MCA Engineering Pty Ltd. The second defendant applied for court-ordered mediation. The court was required to decide whether to grant the leave sought by the first defendant and whether to order mediation between the second defendant and the plaintiff. The court considered the circumstances of the case, the potential for mediation to resolve the dispute, and the impact of the leave on the proceedings. It found that the first defendant should be granted leave to issue a Third Party Statement of Claim. The court also considered the application for mediation but did not order mediation at that stage, instead adjourning the application for a later date. The court made orders granting the leave sought by the first defendant and adjourning the second defendant's application for mediation. The court also made an order regarding the costs of the applications.

Orders

Orders of the court

The first defendant has leave to file and serve a third party notice and statement of claim on MCA Engineering Pty Ltd ACN 149 957 353 on or before 29 March 2019.1.

The second defendant’s application filed 27 February 2019 is adjourned to the registry for the registrar to fix a hearing date if requested by any party after that party gives the other parties at least three business days written notice.2.

Unless either party applies for a different costs order, or the parties otherwise agree, within 14 days of this judgment, the costs of and incidental to the applications filed 27 February 2019 and 15 March 2019 will be each parties’ costs in the proceedings.3.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.