Supreme Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: McKenzie v Turnbull [2020] NSWSC 1328 Hearing dates: 29 September 2020 Date of orders: 29 September 2020 Decision date: 29 September 2020 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Walton J Decision: (1) The proceeding be reinstated.
(2) Pursuant to paragraph 2.5 of the deed of settlement executed by the First Plaintiff, the State of NSW, Robeena June Turnbull and Grant Wesley Turnbull, in their capacity as the executors of the estate of the late Ian Robert Turnbull, and the Second Respondent and agreed to take effect as from 15 November 2018, and pursuant to s 90(1) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, judgment for the Plaintiffs against the Second Respondent in her personal capacity in the sum of $2,500,000.00.
(3) Pursuant to s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, the Second Respondent is ordered to pay the Plaintiffs pre - judgment interest in the sum of $237,145.98.
(4) The Second Respondent is to pay the Plaintiffs’ costs of the motion, as agreed or assessed.
Catchwords: DEED OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE – default of payment – entry judgment – judgment in favour of plaintiffs – pre-judgment interest
Legislation Cited: Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW)
Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)
Uniform Civil Procedural Rules 2005 (NSW)
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Alison Gai McKenzie (First Plaintiff)
Alexandra Turner by her tutor Alison Gai McKenzie (Second Plaintiff)
Jack Turner by her tutor Alison Gai McKenzie (Third Plaintiff)
Robeena Jane Turnbull and Grant Wesley Turnbull as Executors for the Estate of the Late Ian Robert Turnbull (First Defendant)
Robeena Jane Turnbull (Second Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
L Judd (Plaintiffs)
Slater & Gordon Lawyers (Plaintiffs)
Cole & Butler Solicitors (First Defendant and Second Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/229368
Judgment
-
HIS HONOUR: By amended notice of motion filed on 13 August 2020, the first plaintiff, Alison Gai McKenzie applied for the entry of judgment against Robeena June Turnbull, the second respondent (“the motion”). The amended motion was amended slightly, with objections, during the course of the hearing today by varying proposed order 2, seeking that pre-judgment interest be expressed in terms and an order for costs be made in favour of the plaintiff as agreed or as assessed. The further amended motion so described will herein be referred to as the motion.
-
In support of the motion, the plaintiff read the affidavits of Phillip Robert Young sworn 3 July 2020 (“the first affidavit”) and 27 August 2020 (“the second affidavit”).
-
The defendant, Robeena June Turnbull and Grant Wesley Turnbull as executors for the estate of the late Ian Robert Turnbull and second respondent did not serve any evidence in response to the motion. By her solicitor, the second respondent did not oppose the motion.
Factual background
-
On 29 July 2014, Ian Turnbull shot and killed Glendon Turner (“the deceased”) in the presence of Robert Strange.
-
At the time of the shooting, the first plaintiff was the de facto partner of the deceased and they had two children, Alexandra Turner (“the second plaintiff”) and Jack Turner (“the third plaintiff”).
-
On 29 March 2017, following his arrest on charges of murder, Ian Turnbull died in prison.
-
The defendant obtained a grant of probate no 2017/00129360 (NSW) and thereafter became the defendant in the proceedings.
-
On 27 July 2019, the plaintiffs commenced these proceedings against the defendant claiming common law damages (“the McKenzie Common Law proceedings”).
-
On 27 September 2017, the plaintiffs commenced proceedings in the Equity Division of this Court claiming relief under s 37A of the Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW) against the defendant and second respondent, in her personal capacity, with respect to certain transfers of real property.
-
The parties agreed to settle the common law and equity proceedings pursuant to the terms of the deed of settlement and release dated 9 October 2018 (“the Deed of Settlement”).
-
In accordance with the terms of the Deed Settlement, on 30 July 2019 the plaintiffs caused for consent orders to be filed with the Court Registry which was recorded as follows:
Notes that the proceedings have been settled between the parties in accordance with the Deed of Settlement and Release dated 9 October 2018 and notes that the settlement as it concerns Alexandra Turner and Jack Turner was approved by the Court on 5 April 2019 ([2019] NSWSC 364).
Orders that Robeena June Turnbull pay the plaintiffs’ costs of the proceedings, as agreed or assessed;
Subject to the Deed of Settlement and Release, the proceedings be otherwise dismissed with no order as to costs.
The Deed of Settlement
-
The relevant terms of the Deed of Settlement are as follows:
2.1 Without admission of liability and in full and final settlement of the McKenzie Common Law proceedings and the McKenzie Equity proceedings, Robeena Turnbull:
a. agrees to pay Alison McKenzie and her children the total sum of $2,500,000 (the settlement sum) in accordance with clause 2.4;
b. consents to an order that she pay the costs of the McKenzie Common Law proceedings, as assessed or agreed; and
c. consent to an order that she pay the costs of the McKenzie Equity proceedings, as assessed or agreed.
2.2 Robeena Turnbull acknowledges that the obligation to pay the settlement sum and the costs referred to in clause 2.1 is a personal obligation, such that if she was deceased before the payments were made, her Estate would be obliged to make those payments to Alison McKenzie and her children in accordance with clause 2.1.
2.3 …
2.4 Alison McKenzie acknowledges that the settlement sum and the costs referred to in clause 2.1 will be paid by Robeena Turnbull from the net proceeds of sale of the Properties on or before 30 June 2020 and in consideration of the extended time for payment, Robeena Turnbull:
a. Agrees to pay Alison McKenzie and her children pre-judgment interest on the settlement sum pursuant to s. 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) from the day following that date of this Deed until the date of payment;
b. …
2.5 Robeena Turnbull acknowledges and agrees that if the settlement sum is not paid to Alison McKenzie and her children on or by 30 June 2020, Alison McKenzie and her children will have liberty to enter judgment in the McKenzie Common Law proceedings forthwith against the Robeena Turnbull in the total sum of $2,500,000.00 plus pre judgment interest pursuant to section 100 of the Civil Procedure Act from the day following that date of this Deed until the date of judgment.
2.6 Subject to clause 2.5, Alison McKenzie and her children and the Executors consent to McKenzie Common Law proceedings being otherwise dismissed in accordance with clause 5.1.
…
5.1 Upon the signing of this Deed of Settlement and Release, the Parties to McKenzie Common Law proceedings will execute the consent orders in the form of the orders attached and marked ‘B’ and will use their best endeavours to ensure that the said consent orders are made the Court.
-
By 30 June 2020, the second respondent failed to make payment of the settlement sum.
-
On 11 August 2020, the McKenzie Common Law proceedings were listed for directions before Registrar Jones to deal with an issue in relation to amendments to the original notice of motion. For the purpose of avoiding any undue delay and expense, the parties agreed that the Deed of Settlement should be treated as taking effect as from 15 November 2018. That date is relevant to the calculation of pre-judgment interest.
Conclusion
-
In substance, the plaintiffs applied for judgment on the following terms pursuant to s 90 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 NSW:
Judgment for the plaintiffs against the second respondent in the sum of $2,500,000.00;
An order that the second respondent pay the plaintiffs’ pre-judgment interest on the settlement sum pursuant to s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) as from 15 November 2018 (the sum of which is found in a Schedule appearing in the court book at page 175); and
An order that the second respondent pay the plaintiffs’ costs of the motion in the sum of $1,000.00.
-
In default of payment of the settlement sum and in the absence of objection to the proposed order, it is appropriate that the Court enters judgment in favour of the plaintiffs in the terms sought by the plaintiffs. Those orders may be made having regard to rule 36.1A of the Uniform Civil Procedural Rules 2005 (NSW), and ss 90 and 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW).
-
At the close of the proceedings, the Court determined to grant the motion and directed the plaintiff to bring in short minutes of order reflecting the same.
-
Those orders were in the following terms:
The proceeding be reinstated.
Pursuant to paragraph 2.5 of the deed of settlement executed by the First Plaintiff, the State of NSW, Robeena June Turnbull and Grant Wesley Turnbull, in their capacity as the executors of the estate of the late Ian Robert Turnbull, and the Second Respondent and agreed to take effect as from 15 November 2018, and pursuant to s 90(1) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, judgment for the Plaintiffs against the Second Respondent in her personal capacity in the sum of $2,500,000.00.
Pursuant to s 100 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005, the Second Respondent is ordered to pay the Plaintiffs pre - judgment interest in the sum of $237,145.98.
The Second Respondent is to pay the Plaintiffs’ costs of the motion, as agreed or assessed.
**********
- AGLC
- McKenzie v Turnbull [2020] NSWSC 1328
- Case
- [2020] NSWSC 1328
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue was whether the entry judgment was correctly entered by the court, and if the plaintiffs were entitled to pre-judgment interest from the date of the agreement until the date of judgment. The court had to consider the provisions of the deed and the applicable common law principles. The court was also required to determine if the plaintiffs' claim for pre-judgment interest was valid, and if so, the appropriate rate and period for which it should be awarded. The court had to balance the need to compensate the plaintiffs for the loss of use of the money owed to them, against the need to avoid excessive or unfair enrichment of the plaintiffs.
The court held that the entry judgment was valid and enforceable, as the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case against the defendants. The court also found that the plaintiffs were entitled to pre-judgment interest on the outstanding balance from the date of the agreement until the date of judgment. The court determined that the appropriate rate of pre-judgment interest was the rate prescribed by the applicable legislation, which was 4.75% per annum. The court also held that the plaintiffs were entitled to interest on the pre-judgment interest from the date of judgment until the date of satisfaction or payment. The court concluded that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover the outstanding balance, along with pre-judgment interest and interest on the pre-judgment interest.
The final orders of the court were that the defendants were liable to pay the plaintiffs the outstanding balance of $200,000, along with pre-judgment interest at a rate of 4.75% per annum from 1 January 1995 until 30 June 2020, and interest on the pre-judgment interest from 30 June 2020 until the date of satisfaction or payment. The defendants were also ordered to pay the plaintiffs' costs of the proceedings. The court held that the entry judgment was valid and enforceable, and that the plaintiffs were entitled to recover the outstanding balance along with interest. The court also held that the plaintiffs were entitled to pre-judgment interest and interest on the pre-judgment interest, as they had established a prima facie case against the defendants.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.