McCormick v Director of Public Prosecutions for Western Australia
Case
•
[2022] WASC 275
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
McCormick v Director of Public Prosecutions for Western Australia [2022] WASC 275
[2022] WASC 275
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The appellant in this case, Orlando Fechin McCormick, appealed against his sentence of 8 months imprisonment, suspended for 12 months, for two charges of assaulting public officers. The appellant also challenged the fines imposed for other charges. The appellant argued that the sentencing magistrate had failed to discount the sentence imposed to reflect his guilty pleas and that the sentences imposed for the assault charges were manifestly excessive as to type. The court held that none of the grounds of appeal had a reasonable prospect of success. The court found that the sentences imposed for the assault charges were not manifestly excessive and that the magistrate had taken the appellant's guilty pleas into account. The court refused leave to appeal and dismissed the appeal.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Criminal Law
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Sentencing
-
Breach of Contract
-
Causation
-
Negligence
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Bellou v Director of Public Prosecutions [2024] WASC 379
Cases Citing This Decision
4
Bellou v Director of Public Prosecutions
[2024] WASC 379
Isaacs v Director of Public Prosecutions for Western Australia
[2023] WASC 154
Bellou v Director of Public Prosecutions
[2024] WASC 379
Cases Cited
26
Statutory Material Cited
0
Samuels v The State of Western Australia
[2005] WASCA 193
Re Rules Of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA); Ex Parte Gates
[2018] WASC 213
Dinsdale v The Queen
[2000] HCA 54